G
grannymh
Guest
I was thinking about jaded teens . It could be that all they will hear is “blah blah blah **God **blah blah blah **sinner **blah blah blah evil.” Unless (in post 36) they already understand these (abstract (?)) theological notions.(I put an interesting issue about “notions” in bold.)Umm… this definition (?): “A grave infraction of the law of God that destroys the divine life in the soul of the sinner (sanctifying grace), constituting a turn away from God. For a sin to be mortal, three conditions must be present: grave matter, full knowledge of the evil of the act, and full consent of the will.”
Look at what a teen has to understand in order even to begin thinking about this definition:
Unless they already understand these (abstract (?)) theological notions, all they’ll hear in this definition is “blah blah blah **God **blah blah blah sinner blah blah blah evil.” Not exactly the best way to help them understand mortal sin, IMHO.
- Law of God
- divine life in the soul
- sanctifying grace
- grave matter
- full knowledge
- full consent of the will
![]()
I have no trouble assuming that “blah blah blah” is true. My question is – How will they recognize “God” as a “person” in a teen analogy and recognize a “person” as a “sinner” in a teen analogy and recognize “evil” in a teen friendship when there are notions and not facts?
If one is going to be fair to a freshman, jaded or not, at some point, the flat out truth has to be mentioned. A couple of approaches could be used. The adult could say that so and so is God in the analogy. Or an adult could say God exists and this is what is important about God and His friendship relationship with a human creature which is you.
In the Catholic Church, this list of facts usually normally is not considered theological notions. Please refer to comment in post 36.
- divine life in the soul
- sanctifying grace
- grave matter
- full knowledge
- full consent of the will