W
worldcitizen
Guest
Have you read this?That discussion on the resurrection can happen later, when you are not trying to get away from the implication of what has been said by the Bahai previously. It seems sound to me and I have not heard an adequate rebuff to what I have said concerning Bahai conceptions of resurrection, that if resurrection is to be judged as the followers keeping to the original teacher’s position and propagating it, that Joseph Smith, C.S Lewis and Augustine have a higher status of resurrection than your Prophet does now. That’s simply the truth of the matter and for you to insist your prophet is alive in the spirit is no special than Mormons insisting Joseph Smith is alive (though they recognise he died Joseph Smith must be acknowledged as alive to the Bahai since this is how you determine your own Prophet alive).
"Thou didst ask as to the transfiguration of Jesus, with Moses and Elias and the Heavenly Father on Mount Tabor, as referred to in the Bible. This occurrence was perceived by the disciples with their inner eye, wherefore it was a secret hidden away, and was a spiritual discovery of theirs. Otherwise, if the intent be that they witnessed physical forms, that is, witnessed that transfiguration with their outward eyes, then there were many others at hand on that plain and mountain, and why did they fail to behold it? And why did the Lord charge them that they should tell no man? It is clear that this was a spiritual vision and a scene of the Kingdom. Wherefore did the Messiah bid them to keep this hidden, ‘till the Son of Man were risen from the dead,’ that is, until the Cause of God should be exalted, and the Word of God prevail, and the reality of Christ rise up.(Abdul-Baha)