S
sambos671
Guest
So that I am not guilty of misleading the discussion by the title of this thread I will state that I am a revert to Catholicism for several of years now. I left the Church many years ago and by God’s grace have returned.
Keeping that in mind as I struggle aligning my thinking to Catholic Theology I wanted to explore certain differences with knowledgable Catholics regarding faith. For this discussion I’m not trying to define what faith is, rather what I really want to get at is the process one obtains faith. To explain I will reveal my thinking. As a warning or a caution there may be leaps in logic which I will be glad to have pointed out. However, my thinking process isn’t properly systematic when it comes to logic.
We see in Jesus parable that in the church the weeds are the constant companions of the wheat until the return of Christ. I take that to mean there are the truelly converted believers and the those that remain in what Paul calls “the flesh.” To my way of thinking understand this dichotomy by classifying catholics who have a faith compared to those that just have a religion. In my limited capasity of discernment I recognize my inability to judge what people fall into what catagory. Thus I can only look at myself and my particular journey experience of faith. However, I recognize that this as well is also limited. However, it is all I have on which to understand things apart divine revelation.
So to get to the crux of the issue. I was raised as a Catholic. Baptized into the faith, went to first communion and somehow was not properly catachized by the time I was confirmed. I thought I knew our Catholic faith by my childish observation during attendance of Mass and instruction at parochial elementary schools. The fact is in my way of thinking I had a religion rather than a faith. Partly because my family had the same issue. Mass is something you did on Sundays for 45 minutes and once out of mass I was free to forget about God and morality for the most part until next sunday. And if I did something really bad I had to go to confession on Saturday which I never revealed the entire truth. Not having a proper faith I became easy pickings (though I say this I don’t mean it in the negative flippant way in which I wrote it) for evangelicals. For me what intrigued me was consistency in belief and practice. My family did not exemplify this but quite the opposit. This is an unfair comparison since the evangelicals I came in contact were missionaries and my family were average working Joes. However, praying to the lord to convert me (I mean asking Jesus into my heart) seemed efficacious in that my heart changed. Whereas before my prayer I wanted to sin, enjoyed sin, and had no thought for God. At this point I had a real desire to avoid sin spend time with Jesus and enjoy him in every aspect of my life. However, after many years I have returned to the Catholic faith believing entirely that indeed Jesus established the Church, by the Holy Spirit guides the Church, and most importantly joins himself to us in the Sacrament of the Eucharist. (BTW I came at this understanding by scripture initially holding to sola scriptura but then realising by scripture alone that scriptures didn’t teach scripture alone… Long story) Unfortunately, as I grow in the Catholic faith I continue to have questions regarding this.
Keeping that in mind as I struggle aligning my thinking to Catholic Theology I wanted to explore certain differences with knowledgable Catholics regarding faith. For this discussion I’m not trying to define what faith is, rather what I really want to get at is the process one obtains faith. To explain I will reveal my thinking. As a warning or a caution there may be leaps in logic which I will be glad to have pointed out. However, my thinking process isn’t properly systematic when it comes to logic.
We see in Jesus parable that in the church the weeds are the constant companions of the wheat until the return of Christ. I take that to mean there are the truelly converted believers and the those that remain in what Paul calls “the flesh.” To my way of thinking understand this dichotomy by classifying catholics who have a faith compared to those that just have a religion. In my limited capasity of discernment I recognize my inability to judge what people fall into what catagory. Thus I can only look at myself and my particular journey experience of faith. However, I recognize that this as well is also limited. However, it is all I have on which to understand things apart divine revelation.
So to get to the crux of the issue. I was raised as a Catholic. Baptized into the faith, went to first communion and somehow was not properly catachized by the time I was confirmed. I thought I knew our Catholic faith by my childish observation during attendance of Mass and instruction at parochial elementary schools. The fact is in my way of thinking I had a religion rather than a faith. Partly because my family had the same issue. Mass is something you did on Sundays for 45 minutes and once out of mass I was free to forget about God and morality for the most part until next sunday. And if I did something really bad I had to go to confession on Saturday which I never revealed the entire truth. Not having a proper faith I became easy pickings (though I say this I don’t mean it in the negative flippant way in which I wrote it) for evangelicals. For me what intrigued me was consistency in belief and practice. My family did not exemplify this but quite the opposit. This is an unfair comparison since the evangelicals I came in contact were missionaries and my family were average working Joes. However, praying to the lord to convert me (I mean asking Jesus into my heart) seemed efficacious in that my heart changed. Whereas before my prayer I wanted to sin, enjoyed sin, and had no thought for God. At this point I had a real desire to avoid sin spend time with Jesus and enjoy him in every aspect of my life. However, after many years I have returned to the Catholic faith believing entirely that indeed Jesus established the Church, by the Holy Spirit guides the Church, and most importantly joins himself to us in the Sacrament of the Eucharist. (BTW I came at this understanding by scripture initially holding to sola scriptura but then realising by scripture alone that scriptures didn’t teach scripture alone… Long story) Unfortunately, as I grow in the Catholic faith I continue to have questions regarding this.
- Being baptized joins me to christ in his death and resurrection and places his mark upon me by the initial action of the Holy Spirit making me born again why then does it seem regeneration didn’t start until my prayer? It seems from my experience that I had the old heart firmly in place until asking for a new one in prayer. Certainly, doesn’t Christ grant this at baptism? If I was placed with a new nature at baptism and made alive at that point why was I so entrenched in “deadness” until later?
- On speaking to a priest who reviewed some reformed ideas indicated that the “conversion experience” which is felt and transformative (what protestants call being born again") is a creation of the Mystical Experience point of view for conversion of a particular reformed theologian whose name I forget.