Exposed Relics on Tridentine Mass Altars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JesuXPIPassio
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JesuXPIPassio

Guest
I thought that relics aren’t supposed to be exposed on top of altars when there’s Mass (or at least they shouldn’t be exposed where the Blessed Sacrament is exposed). But, I was watching the Latin Masses they show on EWTN sometimes, and there are what look like reliquaries with relics in them on the altars. Am I mistaken?
 
I thought that relics aren’t supposed to be exposed on top of altars when there’s Mass (or at least they shouldn’t be exposed where the Blessed Sacrament is exposed). But, I was watching the Latin Masses they show on EWTN sometimes, and there are what look like reliquaries with relics in them on the altars. Am I mistaken?
I can’t say what EWTN does or doesn’t do (the channel isn’t available to me). But I can say that when the EF is celebrated in a church where the relics either aren’t there, or have been removed, it’s a common practice to have the relics on the altar in some kind of reliquary; so they probably are reliquaries. I think there’s a difference here between having relics exposed for particular veneration, which would not be appropriate during Mass and on the other hand simply having the relics there on the altar (as a replacement for the practice of having them within the altar).
 
I can’t say what EWTN does or doesn’t do (the channel isn’t available to me). But I can say that when the EF is celebrated in a church where the relics either aren’t there, or have been removed, it’s a common practice to have the relics on the altar in some kind of reliquary; so they probably are reliquaries. I think there’s a difference here between having relics exposed for particular veneration, which would not be appropriate during Mass and on the other hand simply having the relics there on the altar (as a replacement for the practice of having them within the altar).
Oh, I didn’t know there was the option of having relics on the altar rather than sealing them in. Isn’t there a potential problem with theft though? Everything in a parish seems to be kept so securely; the Eucharist is obviously locked in the tabernacle and even the holy oils are kept in an ambry. Seems weird they’d just keep relics exposed on altars like that on what don’t look like built-in reliquaries.
 
Oh, I didn’t know there was the option of having relics on the altar rather than sealing them in. Isn’t there a potential problem with theft though? Everything in a parish seems to be kept so securely; the Eucharist is obviously locked in the tabernacle and even the holy oils are kept in an ambry. Seems weird they’d just keep relics exposed on altars like that on what don’t look like built-in reliquaries.
Seems weird they’d just keep relics exposed on altars like that on what don’t look like built-in reliquaries.
Seems weird to me also. Most Alter Stones whether granite or marble and the built in reliquaries that I’ve seen had a tightly interwoven cloth wrapped around the entire Alter Stone.
The cloth sometimes due to age is resemblance to cheese cloth and is sometimes re-wrapped if the reliquaries have been removed for some reason. Kinda makes no sense though to have an Alter Stone set inside the Alter with no reliquaries or are easily removable from their seal.
 
The relics of St Fermin (Firmin(us)) - piled long bones etc., are clearly seen in a golden box with windows right over the altar (ciborium) of the great cathedral at Amiens, France.
 
The relics aren’t left on the altar 24/7. They’re only placed there for Mass–otherwise they’re secured someplace (in the type of situation that the OP is describing when they were either not placed within the altar to begin with, or were later removed).
 
There are diagrams in the old Latin altar missals showing where relics can be placed on the altar, and when they would be censed should they be there.
 
I am sorry to see that we have some immature members in here, who refer to to the venerable practice of placing relics on an altar as “weird,” simply because they themselves were ignorant of the centuries-old Catholic custom.

I am offended at this description of such a beautiful practice.
 
I am sorry to see that we have some immature members in here, who refer to to the venerable practice of placing relics on an altar as “weird,” simply because they themselves were ignorant of the centuries-old Catholic custom.

I am offended at this description of such a beautiful practice.
You seem to be taking that out of context.

I called it “weird” as in it doesn’t look like the usual practise. I’m aware that relics are put into an altar, but I still do say it seems weird that they keep it on an altar. Like I said, relics aren’t supposed to be exposed when the Blessed Sacrament is exposed; it looks like a deviation from that rule when relics are exposed on an altar when Mass is going on. Aside from that, I’m not even sure relics are supposed to ever be placed on an altar, but rather that they are supposed to be placed on another table.

And again, as everything precious in the church is locked away, it seemed weird they’d just keep relics out like that because those items tend to attract theft. Father David clarified those issues for me in that the relics are later removed, but you can’t blame me for thinking it’s weird since even the holy oils are locked away.

Lastly, it seems weird to keep relics on top of an altar seeing as how there are already supposed to be relics inside. I haven’t ever read anything about relics being placed on top of altars, only within.

I also don’t think it’s a centuries-old custom to keep relics on the altar. It certainly is a custom to have them encased inside, or over the altar in cases of major relics, but outside of the instance I mentioned in my first post, I haven’t seen them placed on top. Judging from the responses on this thread, neither has most everyone else, with the exception of Father David.
 
You seem to be taking that out of context.

I called it “weird” as in it doesn’t look like the usual practise. I’m aware that relics are put into an altar, but I still do say it seems weird that they keep it on an altar. Like I said, relics aren’t supposed to be exposed when the Blessed Sacrament is exposed; it looks like a deviation from that rule when relics are exposed on an altar when Mass is going on. Aside from that, I’m not even sure relics are supposed to ever be placed on an altar, but rather that they are supposed to be placed on another table.

And again, as everything precious in the church is locked away, it seemed weird they’d just keep relics out like that because those items tend to attract theft. Father David clarified those issues for me in that the relics are later removed, but you can’t blame me for thinking it’s weird since even the holy oils are locked away.

Lastly, it seems weird to keep relics on top of an altar seeing as how there are already supposed to be relics inside. I haven’t ever read anything about relics being placed on top of altars, only within.

I also don’t think it’s a centuries-old custom to keep relics on the altar. It certainly is a custom to have them encased inside, or over the altar in cases of major relics, but outside of the instance I mentioned in my first post, I haven’t seen them placed on top. Judging from the responses on this thread, neither has most everyone else, with the exception of Father David.
I am taking nothing out of context. The use of a pejorative term such as weird indicates ignorance and/or immaturity and, quite frankly, I am shocked to see that you repeated it.

You are obviously very unfamiliar with the liturgical history of our Church. Your knowledge and experience seem very limited to the here and now, in this case, the post-Vatican II world. You allude to the fact that not a large number of posters here seemed to know about it, and offer this as a basis for your refusal to believe in its legitimacy. (Could you not even have googled it, just to find out the basics?) Not only is the presence of relics on the altar a centuries-old pracitice, another member here has already pointed out the fact that pre-VII altar missals even show in which order these relics are to be incensed during the two altar incensations at Mass. Moreover, the Sacred Congregation Rites even indicated how many swings and in which sequence the relics were to receive. (Also, to be precise, the reliquaries were generally on the gradine, along with the candlesticks, rather than on the altar itself. See the picture below)

I readily concede that the practice has ceased in the post-VII era, and that is fine. But it was alive and well up until the council, and still exists in churches where the EF is celebrated. Rather than using how many members here are familiar with the practice as a measure of its validity and widespread use, you ought to consult read pre-VII liturgical books and the various liturgical authors of the era, including the big names of Fortescue, O’Connell, Bruce, Zualdi, McManus, et al., instead of declaring it “weird.”

http://www.sanctamissa.org/en/sacristy/sacristy-sanctuary-and-altar/sanctuary-and-altar-04.jpg
 
While I thank you for educating me on this topic, I don’t get what is the reason for your attitude. Yes, I am ignorant on this issue, which is why I asked about it in the first place. Like I said, “I didn’t know there was the option of having relics on the altar rather than sealing them in.”

And at no time did I “refuse” to believe this was a legitimate option.

Perhaps I didn’t Google it, but I did try to learn about it, which is why I posted about this up on this site. Isn’t that the purpose of a forum? Just because I didn’t do it the way you might, it doesn’t make me wrong.

Lastly I find it amazing that one can be so offended that I thought it was weird. I clarified in my last post that I meant “weird” as in it doesn’t look like the usual practise. Obviously it’s something I’ve never seen before and it looked like a deviation from what is proper. Hence, again, it is my own ignorance. Which is why I asked about it. If you find it so offensive, I’m sorry for that but I’m not taking back what I said, since it seemed weird to me with the limited information I had on the subject at the time. If I knew everything, I wouldn’t have asked, and I wouldn’t have kept saying that it *seemed *weird (as in it seems weird to me) and kept using subjective terms like that because it looked unusual to me.

So, there you go. In a bad mood or something? Cheer up, and have a great Sunday (or Saturday or whatever day it is in your part of the world).
 
For the sake of clarity:

It is expected that when the Extraordinary Form of the Mass is being celebrated, there will be relics within the altar-- i.e. placed permanently inside the altar itself or somehow beneath the altar (especially if the altar was built directly above the tomb of a saint). There is no absolute requirement that relics be present for the Mass–priests have always celebrated Mass at temporary altars without relics.

Many newer (ie post Vatican II) altars do not have relics in, or beneath, or anywhere near the altar. When the Extraordinary Form of the Mass is celebrated on an altar which completely lacks any relics, an accomodation is often (but not necessarily always) made–the relics (in a reliquary of some sort) are placed on the mensa of the altar during the celebration of Mass. When the Mass is over, the relics are returned to some secure and appropriate location (whatever that might be).

Although I did not see the Mass on EWTN, it seems from what the OP described, that this is what happened.
 
I am taking nothing out of context. The use of a pejorative term such as weird indicates ignorance and/or immaturity and, quite frankly, I am shocked to see that you repeated it.
Please re-read post #3. The poster, JesuXPIPassio, thought it “weird” that the relics would be left on the altar unsecured. That’s the key point. Not that they were on or near the altar, but that they were in a situation in which someone might steal them.
 
Please re-read post #3. The poster, JesuXPIPassio, thought it “weird” that the relics would be left on the altar unsecured. That’s the key point. Not that they were on or near the altar, but that they were in a situation in which someone might steal them.
Thank you, Father. While that point was made initially, subsequent posts seemed to go beyond that. And honestly, many churches do not remove the reliquaries after Mass, though I agree that they should.
 
The relics of St Fermin (Firmin(us)) - piled long bones etc., are clearly seen in a golden box with windows right over the altar (ciborium) of the great cathedral at Amiens, France.
While we’re on that topic, I’m curious, even when there is a major relic like that, do they still include smaller relics of other saints? If so, are those also visible behind the glass, or are they entombed in the altar as usual?

Also (except for the case of whole bodies of saints), can they ever have relics displayed behind glass inside the altar? Or is it always entombed in something opaque? Like, is there ever a sort of display-case looking altar to display those small relics?
 
I’ve uploaded the photos of the St Fermin bones over the high altar in Amiens cathedral - just click on my profile.

Another spectacular example is the basilica of St John Lateran (San Giovanni in Laterano), Rome, where the high altar actually forms part of a reliquary (the baldaccino) housing the skulls of Saint Peter and St Paul who overlook the basilica.

In some churches in Europe bones of saints can be viewed directly under the altar behind glass.
 
The relics are like statues, they represent the saints.

The relics give also the perception that the saints surround the Altar during Mass.

In fact, even in Novus Ordo Masses, we expose at least two relics for veneration.

These relics also help the people recognize the saints, especially if the saint of the day is being followed.
 
While we’re on that topic, I’m curious, even when there is a major relic like that, do they still include smaller relics of other saints? If so, are those also visible behind the glass, or are they entombed in the altar as usual?

Also (except for the case of whole bodies of saints), can they ever have relics displayed behind glass inside the altar? Or is it always entombed in something opaque? Like, is there ever a sort of display-case looking altar to display those small relics?
Actually they have these small lockets called “theca” (Latin for small case) and these are commonly used for both purposes. They can be entombed or exposed.

An example here:

3.bp.blogspot.com/_Q3JZt4Vgfos/SpOtFRs4skI/AAAAAAAAAWg/Xtca48FHrsk/s1600-h/Picture+003.jpg

First row: Bl. Marcelina Darowska (hair and bone)
Second row: Bl. Columba Marmion, St. Joseph Marello and Bl. Alberto Marvelli
Third row: St. Arcangelo Tadini, Bl. Francesco Pianzola
Last row: Bl. Marie Leonie Paradis.

all these in my custody
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top