Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion rookie

  • Thread starter Thread starter Knight
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.


I actually don’t mind everyone’s opinions and I find it interesting. I was simply asking about what kinds of things should I be aware of? What do I say to a person who is asking for a blessing? What happens if something drops? If a person walks away without consuming? Stuff like this.
Having been around here for several years now, and seen many such topics on this forum, I think the best thing anyone can tell you is to not look here for an answer to your question.

Quite frankly, the only way you’re going to know what will happen at those training sessions will be to attend them.
 
If that were the case, why wouldn’t the same meaning of the word “extraordinary” apply to the Missal of 1962?
It DOES.

The word means the same thing.

As for the term extraordinary form of the Mass: that term applies exactly when the situation is other-than the usual situation. In this case, a group of the faithful (or even an individual priest) who happen to have an affection for the 1962 Missal. This varies from the usual (ie ordinary) situation where most people prefer the current Roman Missal.

The desire for the older Missal is the genuine need which allows for an extra-ordinary Missal to be used, instead of the ordinary one.

Likewise, if there is a genuine need, an extraordinary minister may be appointed to supplement (or in some cases substitute for) the ordinary minister.
 
My words have been twisted and used for agenda posting.
I know the meaning of “extraordinary”.
It is used often, ad nauseum, by those who don’t like the use of EMHC to say that they should not be used. But these are the very same people who want the EF to be the regular Mass.

I am done with this conversation. The use of EMHC is up to the Bishop and/or Pastor and that decision is way above my pay grade. I have done nothing but share what I have been taught by competent Church authorities, in my particular diocese. I am sorry if you don’t like what I said, but I do not need your correcting.
 
The parish here just added the requirement for ushers and EMHC to pass a background check. Not sure if you’ll see the same requirement.

There were a few here that we pretty offended by the new requirement, so they lost a handful of ushers and EMHC.
 
In our diocese an EMHC who is going to homes or to the hospital absolutely has to have a criminal check and vulnerable sector check.
 
It is used often, ad nauseum, by those who don’t like the use of EMHC to say that they should not be used. But these are the very same people who want the EF to be the regular Mass.
You have to admit that in an ideal world we’d have so many ordained clergy that we laypeople wouldn’t need to be enlisted to distribute Holy Communion. I don’t see that happening in my lifetime. I’d be thrilled to live to see every parish with no priest or deacon actually having two. I don’t think we’ll live to see enough clergy to distribute Holy Communion at every single Mass, even under both forms, without enlisting the help of the laity.

(PS If there is someone who wants the Extraordinary Form to become the Ordinary Form, they can keep dreaming, too. It isn’t happening in our lifetimes, no matter how ideal they think it would be.)
 
Last edited:
The correct term is “Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion” not “Eucharist Minister,” becuase they’re just that; extraordinary. To be used in extraordinary circumstances.
Some parishes use the term “eucharistic minister” for lay people who distribute holy communion at Mass.
 
Redemptionis Sacramentum made it very clear that that term was not to be used for anyone but a priest or bishop.
 
I did find a few training guides online from various parishes and thumbed through those. Fairly general and more or less what I expected. I’m only planning on assisting during the mass I already attend and later in life when my own family duties lessen I’d be happy to go to the homebound and various houses for this.
The parish here just added the requirement for ushers and EMHC to pass a background check. Not sure if you’ll see the same requirement.
Considering what’s been going on with the scandal and whatnot this doesn’t surprise me in the slightest! I figured that I’d be subject to some background check and quite frankly I’m ok with that. If it’s a measure that helps to prevent abuses and it’s not immoral then I am all for it.
 
Background checks make sense especially if an EMHC does home visits. Frail people will feel reassured.
 
Our diocese has done background checks for lots of things for at least 20 years. No one has a problem with it as far as I know. Anyone volunteering to work at the local Catholic school has to have it as well. Parents are happy about that.
 
One thing observed in recent years is the use of jelled alcohol hand sanitizer by the extraordinary ministers as they enter the Sanctuary before distributing Communion. Depending on the parish, the sanitation station may be hidden behind a pillar, concealed behind some other structure, or simply set out in the open. One could smell the Purell wafting through the church.
However, in recent weeks, our EMs no longer apply hand sanitizer at the moment the enter the Sanctuary. Given the proximity of volatile alcohol vapors and open candle flames. Perhaps someone had a mishap.
 
Considering what’s been going on with the scandal and whatnot this doesn’t surprise me in the slightest! I figured that I’d be subject to some background check and quite frankly I’m ok with that. If it’s a measure that helps to prevent abuses and it’s not immoral then I am all for it.
Background checks make sense especially if an EMHC does home visits. Frail people will feel reassured.
Our diocese has done background checks for lots of things for at least 20 years. No one has a problem with it as far as I know. Anyone volunteering to work at the local Catholic school has to have it as well. Parents are happy about that.
TBH, sounds like it has to do with a bankruptcy deal that the diocese is going through. Since they’re fighting some sort of bankruptcy, a requirement that anyone who may handle collection money (EMHC and ushers) require a background check. I think a lot of people took that to mean the diocese thinks they’re stealing so they decided to stop volunteering.

I didn’t say getting a background check is necessarily a bad thing, just a heads up it may be required.
 
They CCL says they may be used. Four other documents say when they may be used, starting with

1973’s Immensae Caritatis Article 1. i. a., b., c. that first allowed EMHCs on a large scale

1980’s Inaestimabile donum a) The Mass, article 10 (Refers back to Immensae Caritatis).

1997’s Instruction ON CERTAIN QUESTIONS REGARDING THE COLLABORATION OF THE NON-ORDAINED FAITHFUL IN THE SACRED MINISTRY OF PRIEST Article 8. (Refers back to Immensae Caritatis).

2004’s Redemptionis Sacramentum Chapter VII, 1. The Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion, articles 157 & 158 (Refers back to Immensae Caritatis).

The continued reiteration of Immensae Caritatis means that that document has not gone the way of the dodo just because a new Code of Canon Law and a new GIRM have been published.
 
Last edited:
Do you mean 300 people present or 300 people receiving the Eucharist. From my experience, usually less than half of the people present receive the Eucharist.
 
The arrogance in some of your comments makes me embarrassed that you have “Hoosier” in your screen name here. That’s not the hospitality we know.

In reference to your number 1, if I’m distributing to a child of questionable age and can’t tell what they’re doing, I will be clarifying with someone if they’re to receive or not. If that offends you, more time in the confessional might be appropriate.
 
LOL Cor,
Im sure you will be pleased to know I no longer reside in the ole hoosier state. However, there was little hospitality in the midwest. Perhaps its because the communities are so close knit that if you didn’t grow up next to so and so’s family no one makes eye contact. It’s sad. Out west perhaps because people are from all over, we all are very friendly. A new family in Church, they are invited over for dinner by many. However in the four diocese in that lovely state, I’ve had nothing but incredible experiences, with the priests, and the liturgy. Truly blessed are the Catholics in an area with such history. Out west, it is still very much mission territory. While we have the natural beauty you will never come close to achieving, you blow us out of the water with liturgy, history, architecture, and especially catechisis. Several parishes I attended in the hoosier state had no EMHC, there was no need. But the ones that did, had no problems. Reception on the tongue was common and handled well, and I never had a problem with my kids there.
You will note that in reference to number one, I am clarifying that if children present themselves properly. This is easy to tell, their hands properly folded, a bow, possibly a kneel, and a tongue out ready to say AMEN. Poorly trained EMHC in my area think they can now decide by the height of someone who can receive. I will speak up loudly saying something like “They are presenting themselves correctly please distribute the Eucharist. They do after they look scared” A bully move. maybe, but there have been times my kids come back feeling horrible and embarrassed. To be fair, I’ve said the exact same thing to several Ordinary ministers of communion…
But bottom line, it is presumptuous for a EMHC to decide who should or should not receive. And since there is no commission for them to bless at all, they have no “power” to pick and choose who should and should not be receiving. That is really one of the problems and why I don’t want any part of it. In my opinion it blurs the line between clergy and laity, and it also can over time appear to devalue how people think about the Eucharist. As a receive on the tongue type person, Ive had some problems with some younger EMHC, say in the high school program who I witness doing and saying things before Mass and dressing and acting inappropriately then handing out communion like tickets to a baseball game. Again, this is anecdotal and localized I’m sure.
As far as confession is concerned, thanks. I have actually taken this to the confessional and more in general voiced my concerns to the priests.
But I caution you cor. If you haven’t experienced the desert of faith in some areas of the country, count yourself blessed. There is not much to life that Indiana can brag about. It’s poor, it’s polluted, its flat. But it is one of the pockets of the Church that is beautiful, Holy and gorgeous with an incredible faithful people and clergy. I miss it so much for that one reason. And really it is the most important reason.
 
It is far more likely to be a safe environment training issue. In the role of EMCH a person wouldn’t have anything to with the collection.

You may be surprised how many people who volunteer for a parish get background checks routinely.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top