Extremely disappointed with Catholic Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter petinley
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

petinley

Guest
They claim that they do not endorse or support a particular party, but with the way they have been pointing people away from a third party which IS in line with Catholic teaching(the American Solidarity Party) and only needs to gain momentum to make it’s worthy candidates viable, they are obviously, but covertly, endorsing the Republican Party despite the fact that their presidential candidate is possibly the biggest con man in the United States history.
 
covertly, endorsing the Republican Party
Evidence
despite the fact that their presidential candidate is possibly the biggest con man in the United States history.
Evidence
By the way, I agree that people should be more open to third party candidates, but right now, we finally have a chance to overturn Roe V. Wade BECAUSE of President Trump. Vote your conscious, but understand WHY it may make sense to vote for Trump. (For the record, I voted third party last presidential election, but Trump has proved himself rather capable)
 
but right now, we finally have a chance to overturn Roe V. Wade BECAUSE of President Trump
Trump was asked last night about overturning Roe vs Wade and his response was “there’s nothing happening there”

His last Supreme Court appointment also considers Roe vs Wade to be settled precedent, so… Don’t get your hopes up.
 
Perhaps. Or perhaps they were more put off by the fact all 3 people on that stage were debating … and could see most of what was being touted was “Subjective Truth” rather than “Objective Truth”.
 
Last edited:
I think Telemundo would disagree with you.
That’s a survey, not a poll.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...se-arent-what-trumps-allies-are-highlighting/

From the article:

The thing about those surveys is that they are garbage. This isn’t meant as disparagement; it’s meant as an accurate reflection of the utility of a survey that consists of a media outlet such as C-SPAN asking people on Twitter whom they think won. A good rule of thumb for a poll is that if anyone can weigh in on it and can encourage other people to participate as well, it’s not going to yield a useful result. When Telemundo announced the results of its informal survey, it deliberately pointed out that the results weren’t scientific, slightly moderating the uselessness of sharing such information in the first place.
 
Perhaps. Or perhaps they were more put off by the fact all 3 people on that stage were debating … and could see most of what was being touted was “Subjective Truth” rather than “Objective Truth”.
Possibly. I think Trump prevailed in the discussion (it’s not a “debate”) but both of the men “showed themselves” from time to time. None of us are perfect.

Was the discussion any more boisterous than what you see sometimes in the British Parliament? That’s what it made me think of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top