Cherubim (angels) are ‘messengers’ - they are delivering the messages of God - thus the wheels (messages from God) follow them.
In the Jewish Gematria, the wheels are understood to be a different kind or class of angel. I don’t see how you get from the text, anywhere, that the wheels represent messages from God.
Here perhaps, but certainly not in other verses as I showed you they were used interchangeably. And scripture will not contradict itself.
Actually, you attempted to show me. I will explain later why you failed to do so.
You have to first distinguish who or what are those and these.
“Those” are the Cherubim, the only other plurality present in the vision. “These” are the wheels, which can be understood both by the preceding verses (that’s what’s being talked about), as well as from this verse itself, which in the third instance of matching the “these” with the “those” it replaces “those” with “wheels.” Very clear.
They only went on the impulse of *the spirit *(God is all in all) - they did not precede the spirit.
Yes, this is correct.
There’s your problem right there: you match verses with ‘like verses’ and they in turn will explain/interpret the meaning. You’re jumping all over the place, no wonder it’s not cohesive.
I’m not jumping all over the place. I’m taking each verse within the context of the whole vision. I’m sorry I’m not being clearer in my explanation, but I assure you my explanation is cohesive.
already did that and it was very clear
Actually you did not, and it was not. Here’s why.
In your posts #52, 55 and 57 you reference a link to a lexicon which gives three meanings to the term “galgal.” I dispute the second meaning, “whirlwind,” as the only two places in scripture it’s given as meaning whirlwind are Ezekiel 10:13 and Psalm 77:19. Before I get to Psalm 77, let me address these other scriptures. As for the third meaning, straw/chaff/husk, your attempt to equate that with a whirlwind is improper.
The scriptures referenced for the third definition are Isaiah 17:13 and Psalm 83:13. Please see the following links with regard these verses:
biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/17-13.htm
biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/83-13.htm
As you can see, the word “galgal” in these verses is translated as “wheel” and “a rolling thing.” Both of these instances, “galgal” is “like chaff before the wind.” Have you ever seen chaff in wind? It rolls along the ground. “Galgal” is a term, as I said before, that specifically refers to rotation, or rolling things, or rolling/rotating wheels. There is a distinction between the wind/whirlwind and the “galgal” that is being pushed along and spun around by the wind.
In post 57, you reference Ezekiel 1:4 to demonstrate a correlation between the wheels and the wind, but the “wheel” isn’t even in that verse (either as Opan or Galgal), as shown here:
biblehub.com/interlinear/ezekiel/1-4.htm
As for you reference to Ezekiel 10:13, as found in the lexicon that you linked, as being translated as whirlwind, see the following link:
biblehub.com/interlinear/ezekiel/10-13.htm
Galgal here is translated as wheel, and it is in the context of moving wheels, therefore this should be understood as wheels rotating. Moreover, given that in the context of other scriptures, it is the “wind” or the spirit who is pushing the “galgal” along, we should likewise understand the galgal in Ezekiel 10:13 to be the wheels being rolled along by the spirit. But in all of this there remains a distinction between the spirit and the wheels. The spirit moves them, but they are not the spirit. The wind moves the chaff, but the chaff is not the wind.
Finally, we get to Psalm 77:19 (actually it’s Psalm 77:18), the only place that galgal is actually translated as whirlwind.
biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/77-18.htm
Here, I argue that what’s going on here is poetic simile. Have you ever heard the sound that chariot wheels make when they’re rolling along really fast? They rumble loudly, like thunder, and thunder is exactly what the Psalm is talking about here. 77:17 ends with “Your arrows went abroad:” followed by 77:18, which first speaks about the voice of God’s thunder in galgal, and continues with “Your lightning lightened the world.” So this verse is about God sending His “arrows” (lightning bolts) and the sound that accompanies it "the voice of God’s thunder in galgal. It’s poetic simile likening the sound of thunder to the noise of a rolling wheel. The Douay Rheims translates galgal here as wheel. It’s only in more modern translations that galgal here is translated as whirlwind or tempest. I assert that, based on
the rest of Scripture, that this is an inaccurate translation.
If you can present a more reasonable reading of it, then I’ll grant the point to you, but as you said, Scripture doesn’t contradict itself. So, why should I grant that since in the rest of Scripture galgal is “wheel,” that contrary to the rest of scripture, this instance should be translated as whirlwind? I don’t see any reason to.
THUS, you have not given clear reason to believe the wheels of Ezekiel’s vision are the Holy Spirit.