M
mommamaree
Guest
I have heard all my life about a book called “Fahrenheit 451” but did not realize until yesterday that a movie by the same name existed. So I watched it on NetFlix today, and I was amazed at some of the prophetic points of the film. I intend to see if I can acquire the book on Kindle, so that I can read it, too.
Anyway, the way in which this relates to Sacred Scripture is this…
In the film, there were the “Book People” who committed to memory a single book, and that book became part of who they are, and the knowledge was passed on to an apprentice of sorts, who memorized the book before an older book person passed on. It reminded me very much of the oral tradition I was taught about that preceded the writing down of much of Sacred Scripture.
Considering the fact that we are never truly secure and confident that our Bibles will not be taken from us, or that Mass or any other beautiful facet of our faith will be banned by our governments, I have a question I hope CAF members will ponder and discuss with me.
Should we, in an effort to protect our Scriptures from destruction, and also to give the Word a deeper hold upon us as Christians, be taking up again the practice of committing Scriptures to memory? As an example, I could select the Gospel of John and diligently practice committing it entirely to memory without error until I have got it perfectly, while others might select a Psalm (or the entire Psalms) or the Apocalypse of John, etc.
Is this a reasonable faith practice to take up again in this modern world? Might it even be necessary? Also, I do realize that languages and translations do add certain complications to this endeavor, so any thoughts regarding that particular challenge are welcome for discussion, too.
Well, that is quite long enough of an opening post, so even though I could blather on further, I will stop here and wait for any responses others may have. Thank you and God bless!
Anyway, the way in which this relates to Sacred Scripture is this…
In the film, there were the “Book People” who committed to memory a single book, and that book became part of who they are, and the knowledge was passed on to an apprentice of sorts, who memorized the book before an older book person passed on. It reminded me very much of the oral tradition I was taught about that preceded the writing down of much of Sacred Scripture.
Considering the fact that we are never truly secure and confident that our Bibles will not be taken from us, or that Mass or any other beautiful facet of our faith will be banned by our governments, I have a question I hope CAF members will ponder and discuss with me.
Should we, in an effort to protect our Scriptures from destruction, and also to give the Word a deeper hold upon us as Christians, be taking up again the practice of committing Scriptures to memory? As an example, I could select the Gospel of John and diligently practice committing it entirely to memory without error until I have got it perfectly, while others might select a Psalm (or the entire Psalms) or the Apocalypse of John, etc.
Is this a reasonable faith practice to take up again in this modern world? Might it even be necessary? Also, I do realize that languages and translations do add certain complications to this endeavor, so any thoughts regarding that particular challenge are welcome for discussion, too.
Well, that is quite long enough of an opening post, so even though I could blather on further, I will stop here and wait for any responses others may have. Thank you and God bless!