Thank you PRmerger,The “impossible to restore again to repentance” refers to final impenitence.
What do you think these things mean?Thank you PRmerger,
You posted: The “impossible to restore again to repentance” refers to final impenitence.
I was unfamiliar with the term “final impenetance” and read about it at catholictreasury.info.
It is true that the dead can’t repent, because it is too late. But “final impenetance” also includes one who has decided that he will not repent.
I still don’t see how the doctrine of repentance fits with the passage. I would appreciate it if you could explain.
- Are you saying that one who has decided that he will not repent, can not change his mind and repent?
- Would not the term “fallen away” include one who intentionally broke one of the 10 commandments and lost his salvation thereby? The doctrine of repentance indicates that that person must repent to regain his salvation. But the passage seems to say that one can not repent after falling away. ie there appears to be some aspect or type of repentance that is one time only.
"For it is IMPOSSIBLE TO RESTORE AGAIN TO REPENTANCE those who have once been enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have FALLEN AWAY, since on their own they are crucifying again the Son of God and are holding him up to contempt. Hebrews 6:4 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition
Thank you for your post.What do you think these things mean?
Fallen away refers to apostasy.
- Once have been enlighten:
- Tasted the heavenly gift:
- Have shared in the Holy Spirit:
- Tasted the goodness of the word of God:
- The powers of the age to come:
apostasy (uh-pos´tuh-see), rebellion against or abandonment of faith. It refers in the Hebrew Bible to Israel’s unfaithfulness to God (Jer. 2:19; 5:6; cf. Josh. 22:22; 2 Chron. 33:19) and in the NT to the abandonment of Christian faith (Heb. 6:6). In Acts 21:21, the Greek root of the word “apostasy” is used for Paul’s alleged rejection of Moses and, in 2 Thess. 2:3, for an expected rebellion before the end.
(The HarperCollins Bible Dictionary)
apos•ta•sy \ə-ˈpäs-tə-sē\ noun
plural -sies [Middle English apostasie, from Late Latin apostasia, from Greek, literally, revolt, from aphistasthai to revolt, from apo- + histasthai to stand — more at STAND] 14th century
1 : renunciation of a religious faith
2 : abandonment of a previous loyalty : DEFECTION
(Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary)
Quid pro quo brother.Thank you for your post.
Yes, apostasy would be included in the phrase “fallen away”.
Are you saying that one who loses salvation by sinning has not “fallen away”?
Surely, one who lost salvation in this way would be considered to have “fallen away”.
But the scripture states that one can not repent after one has “fallen away”. Yet the doctrine of repentance states that one who has fallen away will have salvation restored by repentance.
Are there multiple types of repentance?..
How does the cycle of salvation, losing salvation by sinning, restoring salvation by repentance fit the passage?
"For it is IMPOSSIBLE TO RESTORE AGAIN TO REPENTANCE those who have once been enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have FALLEN AWAY, since on their own they are crucifying again the Son of God and are holding him up to contempt. Hebrews 6:4 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition
Lord of Heaven and Earth, please reveal yourself to Isaiah45_9 and I! Amen.
He can change his mind as long as he is living and has use of his reason.
- Are you saying that one who has decided that he will not repent, can not change his mind and repent?
No one has “salvation”, bbb, until he dies. You are saved when you die.
- Would not the term “fallen away” include one who intentionally broke one of the 10 commandments and lost his salvation thereby?
Do you have a Scripture verse for this? I am looking for the words “regain” and “salvation”.The doctrine of repentance indicates that that person must repent to regain his salvation.
Yes. That would be the final type.But the passage seems to say that one can not repent after falling away. ie there appears to be some aspect or type of repentance that is one time only
Sorry. I don’t understand your question.I still don’t see how the doctrine of repentance fits with the passage. I would appreciate it if you could explain.
Amen!"For it is IMPOSSIBLE TO RESTORE AGAIN TO REPENTANCE those who have once been enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have FALLEN AWAY, since on their own they are crucifying again the Son of God and are holding him up to contempt. Hebrews 6:4 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition
I thought that according to Catholic doctrine, a mortal sin would constitute “falling away”.No one has “salvation”, bbb, until he dies. You are saved when you die.
Do you have a Scripture verse for this? I am looking for the words “regain” and “salvation”.
Yes. That would be the final type.
Sorry. I don’t understand your question.
Amen!
Would you please explain the evils on these little guys?
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-R9wtEU9QP...AAyo/J4Dh_WB-Ifw/s1600/baby_smiling_small.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IlDwWEMoYcg/T3NZCyAnLfI/AAAAAAAAAyY/4AmzrdmlQYQ/s1600/baby-smile.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dn8ITF8-DZk/TVEtHWZzTfI/AAAAAAAAAF8/566hFWRpzsQ/s1600/smiling-baby.jpg
Thanks.
The child is not blame for their parent's sins. Only if the child grows up and accepts and copy off the parents, than the parent's sins become the child A child's innocent is only external until the child grows and learn how to love and serve the Kord correctly, and than the child's innocent become internal, which means,from the spirit. The Lord is 100 time more innocent than billions of children. No child is born perfect.
Yes.I thought that according to Catholic doctrine, a mortal sin would constitute “falling away”.
Yes. Repent and receive the Sacrament of Confession.I also understood that the one must repent of a mortal sin or suffer damnation.
Yes, this refers to final impenitence.But Hebrews 6: 4-6 states that repentance is impossible for one who has “fallen away”. Since a mortal sin equals falling away, repentance is impossible for one who has committed mortal sin.
If one has final impenitence, yes, then it is impossible for him to be saved.So, repentance of mortal sin to avoid damnation doesn’t seem to fit (seems inconsistent with) Hebrews 6:4-6
Amen!"For it is IMPOSSIBLE TO RESTORE AGAIN TO REPENTANCE those who have once been enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have FALLEN AWAY, since on their own they are crucifying again the Son of God and are holding him up to contempt. Hebrews 6:4 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition
I think it would be best if you answered the questions posed earlier to you. Then it would be easier for us to address where you are mistaken.I may misunderstand Catholic doctrine or the passage or both. If you can explain, I would appreciate it.
Indeed. This is very Catholic.The child is not blame for their parent’s sins.
Bible verse for this, please.A child’s innocent is only external
This, too, is very Catholic.The Lord is 100 time more innocent than billions of children. No child is born perfect.
Thank you PRmerger.Yes.
Yes. Repent and receive the Sacrament of Confession.
Yes, this refers to final impenitence.
If one has final impenitence, yes, then it is impossible for him to be saved.
Amen!
I think it would be best if you answered the questions posed earlier to you. Then it would be easier for us to address where you are mistaken.
Member Isaiah posed these questions to you:
What do you think these things mean?
Please answer and then you can be directed to the correct understanding of that verse in Sacred Scripture.
- Once have been enlighten:
- Tasted the heavenly gift:
- Have shared in the Holy Spirit:
- Tasted the goodness of the word of God:
- The powers of the age to come:
And what is it that you believe these verses mean?Thank you PRmerger.
Those 5 phrases indicate that the person was or is a Christian, saved, had received eternal life, etc so the passage is not talking about a nonconvert. Is that what you are looking for?
Great, for that is an innovation created by people who have divorced themselves from the faith given, once for all, to the apostles.I am not one who believes that the scriptures teach once saved, always saved.
I think Paul is refering to one who is throughly knowledgeable within the faith of Christ’s church. Who then discards their faith of Christ’s church and turns away from it. Martin Luther might possibly be a good example. Mr. Luther without voicing it basicly said, Holy Spirit I don’t like the way your guiding Christ’s church. I don’t like were you are leading Christ’s church and I can do a better job without you Holy Spirit. Mr. Luther then metaphorically kicked the Holy Spirit to the curb. Mr. Luther then started a new Christian church under his instruction and guidance independent of the Holy Spirit who was sent by God to guide Christ’s church.Jose,
"For it is IMPOSSIBLE TO RESTORE AGAIN TO REPENTANCE those who have once been enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have FALLEN AWAY, since on their own they are crucifying again the Son of God and are holding him up to contempt. Hebrews 6:4 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition
If Mortal Sin causes the loss of one’s salvation, and since the passage above states that one who has fallen away CANNOT repent again… how can salvation be restored by repentance?
Lord of Heaven and Earth, please reveal yourself to Jose and I! Amen.
Just to be clear: we are not certain who the inspired author of Hebrews is. It does not appear to be St. Paul, according to most Scripture scholars.I think Paul is refering to one who is throughly knowledgeable within the faith of Christ’s church.
If “faith alone” means one can have faith, flaunt God’s commands and still go to heaven, then I can see why God’s people would be upset about “faith alone”.Wow, this is a long thread! I admit I have not read through alll 26 pages of responses but I posted on another thread which had the same topic, so I figured I should re-post it here:
The debate between faith vs good works is a case of a false dichotomy. It’s true that some Christian churches emphasize one over the other, but it is just silly to claim that salvation is based on only one and not the other. I just love C.S. Lewis’ perspective on the matter:
“There are two parodies of the truth which different sets of Christians have, in the past, been accused by other Christians of believing: perhaps they may make the truth clearer. One set were accused of saying, ‘Good actions are all that matters. The best good action is charity. The best kind of charity is giving money. The best thing to give money to is the Church. So hand us over ₤10,000 and we will see you through.’ The answer to that nonsense, of course, would be that good actions done for that motive, done with the idea that Heaven can be bought, would not be good actions at all, but only commercial speculations. The other set were accused of saying, ‘Faith is all that matters. Consequently, if you have faith, it doesn’t matter what you do. Sin away, my lad, and have a good time and Christ will see that it makes no difference in the end.’ The answers to that nonsense is that, if what you call your ‘faith’ in Christ does not involve taking the slightest notice of what he says, then it is not Faith at all — not faith or trust in Him, but only intellectual acceptance of some theory of Him.”
-Mere Christianity
Obviously good works by themselves is not enough, otherwise atheists who do good things could be saved on that merit alone. And faith without good works is dead…if you claim to have faith but do no good works, it leads one to question whether you truly have faith in the first place. To paraphrase Lewis, the debate of faith vs good works is like arguing which blade on a pair of scissors is most necessary.
Whether your belief in “once saved, always saved” excludes you from the Catholic Church or not, I do not know. But as to your eternal destiny, I submit the following:I am reading this thread with great interest. I am a practicing Catholic. Follow the rules the best I can, and go to confession when I mortally sin in the eyes of the Catholic doctorine.
However, if I was honest with myself, I am struggling with this idea that if I go to confession , my soul is then in a state of grace and I will go to heaven. But then i somehow mortally sin the next day - I am condemned to hell ? (not because I do not love God - but am a human being that stumbles at times).
I do not wish to leave the Catholic religion that I grew up with since I do not beleive a very important part of the Catholic doctorine…, but I must admit that I believe that “once truly saved by accepting sincerely Jesus into your hearts”, …that you are then eternally saved… and thus a will not want to sin again and as a result will practice good works as a result of your love for Christ and Him saving you - versus following certain doctorine (works) that may be simply too hard for any human to be like 100 percent of the time. How many times does Christ have to die on the cross for it to be good enough for all of my sins ? Are we saying that Jesus dying and rising alone is not enough to cover all of my sins and pay my penalty for my sinfull nature. (sorry this is what I believe - and I am not looking to debate my belief)… but am concerned if I am wrong… as I do not want to spend eternity in hell. I truly want to know the will of God and follow it.
Yes their is confession. but is my salvation like a “yo-yo”… I am saved today, condemned to hell tomorrow, then saved again the next day when I go to confession, etc).
I do not wish to debate my “once saved. always saved” opinion - and I guess that makes me a born again catholic (if such a term even exists)…, but my question to you all sincerely is this… since I believe in once saved always saved… am I no longer a Catholic and condemned to hell (even if I try and practice the faith/religion - even though I may not believe all of the doctorine of the Catholic faith… Am I rejecting my catholic faith and doomed to etertnity in hell in your honest opinion since I am being honest that I believe that faith in Jesus alone is all that is needed (true faith in Jesus in our hearts that wants us to change from our old self to be more like Christ).
Thank you
Steve