C
CopticChristian
Guest
Ig,As was I. Mine was in a Reformed Baptist SBC church and they said much the same thing. Unfortunately, they do make it sound logical and so it has a very common sense appeal. That is, it appeals to our own ego, because we are naturally curved inward and so what happens “inside” is always seen as more important than what happens (as Luther would say) extra nos.
For your listening pleasure, whenever you may get the time, here is a debate between a Reformed theologian and a Lutheran pastor on baptismal regeneration ruberad.wordpress.com/2010/05/17/hns-regen/. It was quite good…and very eye opening into the Reformed mindset on the sacraments.
I cannot wrap my head around this…I never read a book to learn to swim, learn Karate, learn Judo, play guitar…although introduced to chords and notes, play hopscotch, teatherball, dodge ball, checkers, bridge…etc…and if someone were to debate over these practices I would laugh.
Babies have been baptized and continue to be baptized and the meaning is shared as I understand it with the Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic East/West…Protestants are divided on this issue. I find these debates as to whether it should be done or what does it mean akin to the aforementioned practices that we all take for granted…How would it be possible for me to listen to a debate that is only 500 years old? How is it possible for something like this to change my mind?
I would ask this question…when and why was the issue of Infant Baptism questioned, ie in what year. I would ask when and why was the issue of Baptismal regeneration questioned, ie in what year.
I would then compare and contrast that with the practices done and still being done and look at the evidence of confrimation or confusion. I could not side with confusion.