J
Jerry-Jet
Guest
For all the Calvinist believers out there respond to this challenge: PROVE that man can not cooperate with a God willed work!
Alot of people forget that parable. At least we can agree on the necessity of faith in Jesus, and His grace, for salvation.IMO, Catholics forget the parable of the wheat, and the tares, and the presence of each in Christ’s Church.
This is a common modern evangelical misunderstanding of the Apostolic Teaching. The Reformers wanted to separate God’s grace from God’s “ordinances” so attempted to redefine the sacraments according to such a manner that would not depend upon the priesthood.He is not referring to water baptism, but a baptism which is not the removal of dirt from the body. Water baptism does remove dirt from the body—this is as difficult as you make it.
I agree! You note that the Apostle uses words related to water?Israel was immersed into Moses in the same way Peter speaks of immersion into Christ1 Corinthians 10:2
…and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea…That is not an external baptism; it is not the removal of dirt from the body, but an identification with Moses.
It’s not a question of logic, but of the writer’s choice of words.
Exactly. Peter is saying that water baptism is NOT for the purpose of removing dirt from the sarx, but to create a clean conscience toward God.In the passage Peter is talking about the sarx, or “flesh;” he is not talking about the psuche, or “soul,” as you contend; therefore, you are incorrect because you refuse to take the writer’s words in their simple sense.
People don’t have to “know” to be baptized. That is why the Apostles taught infant baptism. However, for adults, I agree, one must come to faith first.I’ve read the scripture, cover to cover, many, many, many times in my life as a regenerate Christian, and have yet to find any scripture that states that water baptism is the agent of salvation.
The agent of salvation is clearly stated in the passage from Titus that you cite:Titus 3:5-7
He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit,
whom He poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior,
Yes to this extent, you are in agreement with Apostolic Teaching. It is the HS that regenerates us in Baptism, not the water itself. Jesus chose to use water, just as He chose to make a mud paste to heal the blind man. Jesus is able to heal and regenerate through whatever means He chooses.
sandusky;3755549:
The agent of regeneration and renewing is identified above as the HS and not the baptismal font.Ephesians 2:1, 4, 5so that being justified by His grace we would be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.
It is not appropriate to separate the two. They are not separated in the NT, and they have never been separated by the Apostolic Churches, until the Reformation.
That’s a pre-baptismal event of God; otherwise, how would one even know to be water baptized?…you were dead…But God, being rich in mercy…made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved)…
For some people it is. Some people are baptized first, and come to a more personal relationship with Christ later. This happens to many who are baptized as infants.I agree, regeneration is not symbolic; it is, however, a pre-water-baptism event; how else could one know to be baptized (repent, believe, be baptized in Christ’s name)?
The two are not to be separated from one another. All who believed were baptized. It is the faith that is acted upon in baptism that saves. Saving faith is faith that works, obedient faith. It is obedient faith that justifies us.Furthermore, one does not become justified by baptism, but by faith (cf Rom 4:3, 10-12).
Baptism does not save (cf Mk 16:16), but faith…belief.
That is because we know our history. We know that the Church was persecuted until Christianity was decrimminalized by the Edict of Milan in 313. Unlike our churches today, those who were not initiated were not permitted. The period of catechumenate was three years, and catechumens were put out of the assembly prior to the mysteries, which were only for the initiated. Everyone who wanted to enter had to be vouched for by a member (like Barnabas vouched for Paul with the Apostles). This is how they protected themselves. Only persons who had made a profession of faith (the creed) were admitted. The modern notion of unbelievers being present cannot be applied.IMO, Catholics forget the parable of the wheat, and the tares, and the presence of each in Christ’s Church.
I’ll restate what I said in an earlier post on this thread:
It’s not a salvation verse. Scripture does not say, “For by grace you have been saved through striving…” This verse refers to our experiential sanctification:"Therefore, beloved, while you are waiting for these thingsCathocism does NOT teach that people can do anything to merit saving grace, which comes from God. However, having received this grace by faith, we are then to live a life worthy of the calling to which we are called. I am curious about your and sandusky’s take on this:
“Therefore, beloved, while you are waiting for these things, strive to be found by him at peace, without spot or blemish; 15 and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation.” 2 Peter 3:14-15
What does the Apostle mean by “strive”? How can any human effort enable us to be found by Christ at peace, without spot or blemish? If we are saved once and for all time permanently, why strive at all? If we are covered by Jesus blood for all sins past, present, and future, why “strive” to be found without spot or blemish? How can the striving of a man add anything to the blood of Christ?
I am taken aback every time I see calvinist answer “no” to this question. Then try the “merited salvation argument” to side track and deflect the glaring indigation of their pronouncement.Just one question.
Is it necessary for us to love God in order to be saved?
A simple “yes” or “no” will suffice.
No.Just one question.
Is it necessary for us to love God in order to be saved?
A simple “yes” or “no” will suffice.
Luther re-discovered the true gospel that had been lost for almost 1,500 years—the RC sacraments and priesthood are not part of that gospel, neither is there any mention of either in the NT writings of the apostles.This is a common modern evangelical misunderstanding of the Apostolic Teaching. The Reformers wanted to separate God’s grace from God’s “ordinances” so attempted to redefine the sacraments according to such a manner that would not depend upon the priesthood.
How much more do you misinterpret scripture?This passage does, indeed, refer to water baptism. The purpose of baptism, sandusky, is not to remove dirt from the body. I am astonished that you would suggest such a thing. Baptism is the normative means by which people are initiated into the Kingdom (Church). No, water baptism is not intended to remove dirt from the body, but to clear the conscience before God. It is not some kind of soap scrubbing!
Actually, the book of Acts records that regeneration precedes baptism.Yes to this extent, you are in agreement with Apostolic Teaching. It is the HS that regenerates us in Baptism, not the water itself.
Actually they were never linked until the early church erroneously did so.It is not appropriate to separate the two. They are not separated in the NT, and they have never been separated by the Apostolic Churches, until the Reformation.
You certainly need for it to be this way in order to keep your errant soteriology intact.That is because we know our history. We know that the Church was persecuted until Christianity was decrimminalized by the Edict of Milan in 313. Unlike our churches today, those who were not initiated were not permitted. The period of catechumenate was three years, and catechumens were put out of the assembly prior to the mysteries, which were only for the initiated. Everyone who wanted to enter had to be vouched for by a member (like Barnabas vouched for Paul with the Apostles). This is how they protected themselves. Only persons who had made a profession of faith (the creed) were admitted. The modern notion of unbelievers being present cannot be applied.
Luther re-discovered the true gospel that had been lost for almost 1,500 years—the RC sacraments and priesthood are not part of that gospel, neither is there any mention of either in the NT writings of the apostles. Does God bless your marriage? No! must be your answer then. Baptism is clearly in scripture instituted by Christ. No need to disprove your assertions for each sacrament. The first two were easily disproven.
All of that comes from the early church error concerning replacement theology. Sure beats the theology that a persons supposed “faith” will force God to grant them salvation.
Anyone interested can read about that early church error, and its effect on the CC up to today in the book Israel and the Church.
How much more do you misinterpret scripture? Ditto
Actually, the book of Acts records that regeneration precedes baptism. in your opinion
Actually they were never linked until the early church erroneously did so. in your opinion.
In the book of the Acts the sequence is easily seen by anyone reading with an un-jaundiced eye: repent…believe…be baptized in the name of Christ. Repentance is necessary? Faith alone has be proven false by your statement.
You certainly need for it to be this way in order to keep your errant soteriology intact. Ditto
However, the point of the wheat and the tares is that one cannot tell the difference.
Furthermore, the tares are not a threat to the church physically, as you contend above, but spiritually, and oftentimes, they’re no threat at all. Only your personal opinion of course
In the scenario you present above, I’m certain that tares were vouching for wheat, and vice versa, all of the time.![]()
Which work do have in mind, Jerry?sandusky: do you think that man can cooperate with a God willed work?
Does it matter if the work is God willed and He calls us to do it?Which work do have in mind, Jerry?
So how do you explain:Just one question.
Mat 24 12Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.
Jesus is describing the conditions in Israel at the end of the age (vs. 3), just prior to His physical return to this earth to set up His Millennial Kingdom. Because of the sinful condition at that future time (the Tribulation, vs. 21), the hearts of men will grow cold toward one another.So how do you explain:
Mat 24 12Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.
Instantly with the Lord.I have a question for those who believe in “faith alone.” What happens to toddlers who die?
No.Are they doomed to hell because of Original Sin?
Grace.If not, then what saves them?
This is fascinating to me. OSAS folks clearly believe that those who do not have faith are condemned already (as do Catholics) because of original sin. Original sin separates us from God. We all believe that we can only be saved by grace, through faith. So, how is it that these souls are “instantly with the Lord”, when they are born under a death sentence?Instantly with the Lord.
No.
Grace.
So toddlers get saved without the need for faith? “Faith alone” doesn’t apply to them?Instantly with the Lord.
No.
Grace.
Just one question.
Is it necessary for us to love God in order to be saved?
A simple “yes” or “no” will suffice.
moondweller,No.
“For by grace you have been saved through faith…a gift of God; not as a result of works…”
**
1 John 4:19 “We love, because He first loved us.**”
So how do you explain:
Mat 24 12Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.
This is the weirdest explanation of this passage that I have ever seen and it is contrary to scripture. I have already shown the necessity of love which you are now calling “a warm heart.” I will now show by scripture the necessity of endurance/perseverence which you now deny as well.Jesus is describing the conditions in Israel at the end of the age (vs. 3), just prior to His physical return to this earth to set up His Millennial Kingdom. Because of the sinful condition at that future time (the Tribulation, vs. 21), the hearts of men will grow cold toward one another.
However, the reference to salvation in that verse is not to the salvation of the soul of the believer (in context, Jewish) who endures persecution at that time, but to his deliverance from it (persecution) by the Lord’s return. No one’s soul is ever saved by a warm heart and his ability to endure (persevere). One is always saved “by grace through faith…”