S
scimitar60
Guest
Nice discussion happening here, quite interesting. 
You are not interpreting this document correctly. There is a difference between the Works of the Law and Good Works. As the DRV says in Gal 5:6, āā¦but faith that worketh by Charity.ā Itās Good Works done IN GODāS GRACE, not apart from His grace. Nowhere does it say in scripture āFaith Aloneā. Itās not earning salvation or our initial justification by doing good works if they are done IN GODāS GRACE. Rom 8:24 says, āFor we are saved by hope.ā Does this mean we are saved by HOPE ALONE?Faith and works in these two:
vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2008/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20081119_en.html
vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2008/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20081126_en.html
We are saved āwithout good worksāā¦that is there is nothing we do of ourselves to āearnā our initial justificationā¦such is a graceā¦but I will let you read both audiencesā¦he gets into these things thereā¦
We are saved by faith alone, but not just any kind of faith. The kind of faith that saves is āfaith that worketh by Charityā. There is no other way to interpret or read it.As the DRV says in Gal 5:6, āā¦but faith that worketh by Charity.ā
But faith that works by charity still means that works (our cooperating with God in performing acts of love) are involved-that* our part is a necessary ingredient of salvation-in spite of the fact that God could save us without* our cooperation if He so desired. Itās an important distinction because it counters the radical Reformed notion that our wills are completely corrupted, that weāre totally depraved, and that only an imputed righteousness could make us just.We are saved by faith alone, but not just any kind of faith. The kind of faith that saves is āfaith that worketh by Charityā. There is no other way to interpret or read it.
I am dumbfounded by the stubbornness in holding onto the notion that it means something else. The Pope says it, but some just canāt accept.
So, youāre basically stating the same thing weāve stated for the lastā¦2000 years. That you do need faith, as well as charity (or good works) with that faith.We are saved by faith alone, but not just any kind of faith. The kind of faith that saves is āfaith that worketh by Charityā. There is no other way to interpret or read it.
I am dumbfounded by the stubbornness in holding onto the notion that it means something else. The Pope says it, but some just canāt accept.
No, Iām not saying that at all. This is so ridiculous. Letās take a ridiculous example to make the point.So, youāre basically stating the same thing weāve stated for the lastā¦2000 years. That you do need faith, as well as charity (or good works) with that faith.
Now, letās consider something else. What about all of the good things the person might have done before they converted? Is it not said in Scripture that Jesus will judge us according to our works? It has been said in the Gospel of Matthew, for heavenās sake.No, Iām not saying that at all. This is so ridiculous. Letās take a ridiculous example to make the point.
Say you have just become justified. Consider that to mean whatever you think it could or should mean. You have just this instant found salvation in Jesus Christ through faith in Him.
Now before anything else happens, a bomb goes off and you are killed. You had no time to even think about good works, let alone do any.
Are you saved and on your way to heaven despite a lack of having accomplished any good works?
If the answer is yes, then you agree that we are saved by faith alone.
If you answer no, then you donāt agree with the Pope.
As Iāve said, and as your Pope has said, good works are the consequence of the kind of faith that saves. * We are saved by faith alone*. The works that flow from the love for Christ are a sign to other humans that you have the kind of faith that saves.
Using the verse we both have quoted (Gal 5:6):We are saved by faith alone, but not just any kind of faith. The kind of faith that saves is āfaith that worketh by Charityā. There is no other way to interpret or read it.
I am dumbfounded by the stubbornness in holding onto the notion that it means something else. The Pope says it, but some just canāt accept.