Faithless people doing good works equivalent to those “God works through Christians”?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steven_Merten
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps I will soon, if time allows and if I may ask, could I ask for your help Dave and VC if needed?
I’m game. I did a lot of research on the canon of Scripture as this was one of the first things I was confronted with by my Protestant friends as a teenager. Their absurd polemics against Catholic teaching kinda nudged me into studying Catholicism.
 
40.png
itsjustdave1988:
I’m game. I did a lot of research on the canon of Scripture as this was one of the first things I was confronted with by my Protestant friends as a teenager. Their absurd polemics against Catholic teaching kinda nudged me into studying Catholicism.
Great, then I’m sure I’ll learn a few things from your expertise! The canon was probably the most convincing issue for me to become Catholic, along with the untenability of sola Scriptura, actually they do go hand-in-hand; you can’t have “Scripture alone” without first knowing what is Scripture. I’ll get my information and thoughts together soon. Thanks again.

Bishopite
 
Hello all,

I have a question for those voting that the Holy Spirit does good works through the faithless as well as Christians.

How are we to understand Jesus parable of the Good Samaratin?

If Jesus taught us, in this day and age, that Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI crossed the road in order not to help the dying robbery victim yet a faithless pagan, through the grace of God, did help the dying victim, how are we to understand this teaching of Jesus?

NAB LUK 10:25

On one occasion a lawyer stood up to pose him this problem: “Teacher, what must I do to inherit everlasting life?” Jesus answered him: "What is written in the law? How do you read it?" He replied:

**"You shall love the Lord your God **
**with all your heart, **
**with all your soul, **
**with all your strength, **
**and with all your mind; **
and your neighbor as yourself."
Jesus said,
“You have answered correctly. Do this and you shall live.”

But because he wished to justify himself he said to Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?” Jesus replied, " There was a man going down from Jerusalvem to Jericho who fell prey to robbers. They stripped him, beat him, and then went off leaving him half-dead. A priest happened to be going down the same road; he saw him but continued on. Likewise there was a Levite who came the same way; he saw him but continued on. But a Samaritin who was journeying along came on him and was moved to pity at the sight. He approached him and dressed his wounds, pouring in oil and wine. He then hoisted him on his own beast and brought him to an inn, where he cared for him. The next day he took out two silver pieces and gave them to the innkeeper with the request: ‘Look after him, and if there is any futher expense I will repay you on my way back.’
“Which of these three, in your opinion, was neighbor to the man who fell in with robbers?” The amswer came, “The one who treated him with compassion.” Jesus said to him, “Then go and do the same.”
 
I was unable to answer the poll, as none of the answers are correct.
 
Hello everyone,

I have another question.

In Jesus parable of the rich man and Lazerous, the rich man, burning in hell, begs that he can come back and warn his brothers. What is he going to talk about to his brothers? Is he going to spend long hours go over the diffence between actual grace, natural grace, efficacious grace, sufficient grace, supernatural grace, Divine grace ect.? Or is the rich man condemened to hell going scream to his brothers that they choose to repent to feed the poor and obey the commandments of God so they do not end up burning in hell like him.

I think Jesus prioritized what we should be focused on by what He Himself did and did not focus on. To simplify and clarify things Jesus simply commanded us feed the poor and obey the commandments if we wish to enter into life. Jesus tells us if we fail to do so He will cast us into hell. This seems like such a simple straight forward approach to letting us know what we should be doing if we wish to enter into life.

What do you think?

LUK 16:19 The Rich Man and Lazarus

"There was a rich man who dressed in purple garments and fine linen and dined sumptuously each day. And lying at his door was a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who would gladly have eaten his fill of the scraps that fell from the rich man’s table. Dogs even used to come and lick his sores. When the poor man died, he was carried away by angels to the bosom of Abraham. The rich man also died and was buried, and from the netherworld, where he was in torment, he raised his eyes and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus at his side. And he cried out, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me. Send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am suffering torment in these flames.’ Abraham replied, ‘My child, remember that you received what was good during your lifetime while Lazarus likewise received what was bad; but now he is comforted here,** whereas you are tormented. Moreover, between us and you a great chasm is established to prevent anyone from crossing who might wish to go from our side to yours or from your side to ours**.’ He said, 'Then I beg you, father, send him to my father’s house, for I have five brothers, so that he may warn them, lest they too come to this place of torment.’ NAB MAT 25:31

"When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit upon his glorious throne, and all the nations will be assembled before him. And he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will place the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. Then the king will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father. Inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me, naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.’ Then the righteous will answer him and say, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? When did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? When did we see you ill or in prison, and visit you?’ And the king will say to them in reply, ‘Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me.’ Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, a stranger and you gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison, and you did not care for me.’ Then they will answer and say, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?’ He will answer them, ‘Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.’ And these will go off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."

NAB MAT 19:16


“Teacher, what good must I do to possess everlasting life?” He answered, "Why do you question me about what is good? There is One who is good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments."
 
What is he going to talk about to his brothers?
He won’t be talking to his brothers at all. His bothers need no other teaching than that taught by the Church. If they do no even listen to the Church, which Christ Himself established as the “pillar and foundation of truth,” than neither will they be convinced if some one should rise from the dead.

Jesus left us an ordained teaching authority. It is the teachings of the lawful pastors of that authority that we should be “focused on.” 😉
 
[Steven Merten]Hello everyone,

I have another question.

In Jesus parable of the rich man and Lazerous, the rich man, burning in hell,begs that he can come back and warn his brothers.
I’m not so sure we can say absolutely that the rich man is in hell although I favor that position. Some say he is in purgatory, but there are a few problems with that idea.

Luke 16:26 says that there is a great “chasm” that prevents someone on the rich mans side to go to the poor mans side on Abrahams bosom, which seems to suggest that he is in hell because once someone is in hell eternity is fixed and he can’t go anywhere else. Purgatory is a temporary place of purgation for those on their way to the beatific vision in heaven.

Yet those who believe it is speaking of purgatory say that in hell there is NO charity and this man is performing a charitable act by thinking of his brothers and their souls; hopefully someone will warn them of the torment they are going to go through if they don’t repent.
What is he going to talk about to his brothers? Is he going to spend long hours go over the diffence between actual grace, natural grace, efficacious grace, sufficient grace, supernatural grace, Divine grace ect.? Or is the rich man condemened to hell going scream to his brothers that they choose to repent to feed the poor and obey the commandments of God so they do not end up burning in hell like him.
We really can’t say for sure and he would, I’m sure, tell his brothers to follow Gods truth and help the poor and those in distress.

Correct me if I’m wrong and I don’t mean this in any derogatory way, but it seems you are perhaps infering that we shouldn’t be discussing the Church’s position on grace or other topics related to theology, or apologetics but instead should be mostly focusing on feeding the poor. Can’t we do both, since Scripture says to do both? (2 Tim 3:15-17,1 Tim 3:15, Matthew 25:26-41)
I think Jesus prioritized what we should be focused on by what He Himself did and did not focus on. To simplify and clarify things Jesus simply commanded us feed the poor and obey the commandments if we wish to enter into life. Jesus tells us if we fail to do so He will cast us into hell. This seems like such a simple straight forward approach to letting us know what we should be doing if we wish to enter into life.

What do you think?
Didn’t Jesus both answer questions on truth and command us to feed the poor?

It’s a both and, not just one over the other. Some do more of one or the other,but both are required by Christ in Scripture. In fact chapters 9-16 in Matthew Jesus answers questions from why He ate with sinners (9:11),why some accused Him of breaking the Sabbath and He had to explain why He wasn’t (12:1-2). He was tested in Mt 15 and 16. He then in Matthew 16:15-18 had to ask His apostles whom do people say that I am?
And in Mt 25 Jesus says to feed the poor.
 
Hello Dave and Bishopite,

I cannot think of one time that Pope John Paul II sternly warned Catholics that if they do not care for the poor, as Christ commands, they will burn in hell. Do you have a quote where Pope John Paul II did so? From what I see and hear from Popes, Bishops and priests, they simply claim, “We don’t know of anyone in hell” and then they go on to focus all their preaching on grace and forgiveness. I do not see this as what the rich man, burning in hell, would focus on. I think the rich man would sternly warn his brothers of eternal damnation for not caring for the poor as Jesus did.

Can you give me a quote from Pope John Paul II where he sternly warns Christ’s flock of eternal damnation if they do not care for the poor?

Please visit WARNING! Jesus Does Not Forgive All
 
Steve Merten,

John Paul II warned us of the consequences of all mortal sin, not just the one you refer to.

He asserted “Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, 'eternal fire.’” (CCC 1035) “Mortal sin … results in the loss of charity and the privation of sanctifying grace, that is, of the state of grace. If it is not redeemed by repentance and God’s forgiveness, it causes exclusion from Christ’s kingdom and the eternal death of hell.” (CCC 1861)
 
[Steven Merten]Hello Dave and Bishopite,

I cannot think of one time that Pope John Paul II sternly warned Catholics that if they do not care for the poor, as Christ commands, they will burn in hell.
Your not Catholic are you. Do you subscribe to sola Scriptura?

Should we not discuss Catholic theology and focus entirely on feeding the poor? Again, Steve I’m trying to understand what you are asking. God gave us functional hands to help the poor and rational minds to help those in err both can be valid forms of charity.

Pope John Paul ll, Benedict XVI nor any other former Pope or for that matter, any person past or present could affirm with absolute certitude that a specific person is in hell. Now, of course there are people in hell, Scripture and the Catholic Church both affim this unfortunate fact, but the Pope nor any other person can say specifically and affirmatively who is in hell because that’s reserved for God alone.
Do you have a quote where Pope John Paul II did so? From what I see and hear from Popes, Bishops and priests, they simply claim, “We don’t know of anyone in hell” and then they go on to focus all their preaching on grace and forgiveness. I do not see this as what the rich man, burning in hell, would focus on. I think the rich man would sternly warn his brothers of eternal damnation for not caring for the poor as Jesus did.
Well, I apologize but I don’t honestly have the time to research all of JPll’s writtings or homilies and give you a direct answer. Dave quoted the CCC and JPll formulated it during his pontificate so that should suffice.
As far as the rich man is concerned, I suppose he would say to feed the poor since he is obviously culpable for his unwillingness to do so to Lazarus, however,if he were able to return, he would also correct others who were in err in their theological view of God, since that is a form of charity too!

As this thread proves I had the wrong position on grace and was corrected by Dave and VC and for that I’m glad. I’m sure I wouldn’t have been in mortal sin holding to something I thought was correct, but nonetheless, it is a good thing.
Steve, I was “poor” in my view of grace and Dave and VC charitably helped me out. When we help our own children or anyone in need and do so under Gods grace for Jesus’ glory without asking for something in return, we ARE doing it to the least of these and fulfilling Mt 25:40. We don’t always have to go down to the local food shelter. Many of the Saints took the position of in all things charity.
Men are eager to turn faith into a word instead of a free-willed life of allegiance, trustworthiness, loyalty, obedience, following and love that faith truly is. The world can measure proclamations from the lips, and the worldly measure themselves by this. Faith is not something that you wake up one morning and find in your soul. Faith is something that grows or dies, increases and decreases, is discarded or cherished. (1TH 3:2-3) (1TI 4:1)
Again, Steve I’m only using this quote of yours from your website in order to show my point. Forgive the bold type that I made but aren’t you doing the same here on your website by describing what “faith” is, yet asking Dave and myself to focus more on feeding the poor? And aren’t you making a prejudgement about us since you don’t honestly know how much time we spend feeding the poor? Again, we should do both 🙂
 
40.png
Bishopite:
And aren’t you making a prejudgement about us since you don’t honestly know how much time we spend feeding the poor? Again, we should do both 🙂
Hello Bishopite,

Where did this come from? I do not recall judging you or Dave as going to hell. Please give me a quote of my words where you think I have done so.
 
40.png
Bishopite:
Pope John Paul ll, Benedict XVI nor any other former Pope or for that matter, any person past or present could affirm with absolute certitude that a specific person is in hell. Now, of course there are people in hell, Scripture and the Catholic Church both affim this unfortunate fact, but the Pope nor any other person can say specifically and affirmatively who is in hell because that’s reserved for God alone.
Hello Bishopite,

I think what you are stating is a modern Church teaching. I do not think you can assert that this is what the Church of the past taught or believed. Pope John Paul II disengaged eternal death anathema Church punishments in 1983 (as I am told). Before this time Church anathema proclimations used Judas Iscariot as an example of someone burning in hell. If one did not repent from what was being dettered in the Church anathema, that culprit is described as ending up like Judas Iscariot. Throwing Stones

The point I am making is that the Church stating that infallibility does not allow Church leaders to see who is in hell, as they confirm that they absolutely know canonized saints are in heaven, seems to be only new modern Church thinking. Possibly it would be better if a person like the rich man, who has first hand experience of the fires of hell, to come back and tell us that we do not want to go there. This could be more helpful than the “universal salvation” that modern Popes seem to lean toward.

Scripture also tells us that Korah is burning in hell.

AnathemaIn the Western Church, Maranatha has become a very solemn formula as anathema, by which the criminal is excommunicated, abandoned to the judgment of God, and rejected from the bosom of the Church until the coming of the Lord. An example of such an anathema is found in these words of Pope Silverius (536-38): “If anyone henceforth deceives a bishop in such a manner, let him be anathema maranatha before God and his holy angels.” Benedict XIV (1740-58–De Synodo dioecesana X, i) cites the anathema maranatha formulated by the Fathers of the Fourth Council of Toledo against those who were guilty of the crime of high treason: “He who dares to despise our decision, let him be stricken with anathema maranatha, i.e. **may he be damned at the coming of the Lord, may he have his place with Judas Iscariot, he and his companions. Amen.” **

quoted from newadvent.org/cathen/01455e.htm

(NUM 16:1-35)(JUD 5-11)

the ground opens its mouth and swallows them alive down into the nether world, with all belonging to them, then you will know that these men have defied the LORD." No sooner had he finished saying all this than the ground beneath them split open, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed them and their families [and all of Korah’s men] and all their possessions. They went down alive to the nether world with all belonging to them; the earth closed over them, and they perished from the community. But all the Israelites near them fled at their shrieks, saying, “The earth might swallow us too!”

**NAB JUD 1:10 **

These people, however, not only revile what they have no knowledge of but are corrupted through the very things they know by instinct, like brute animals. So much the worse for them! They have taken the road Cain took. They have abandoned themselves to Balaam’s error for pay, and like Korah they perish in rebellion. These men are blotches on your Christian banquets. They are wild ocean waves, splashing their shameless deeds abroad like foam, or shooting stars for whom the thick gloom of darkness has been reserved forever.
 
40.png
itsjustdave1988:
Steve Merten,

John Paul II warned us of the consequences of all mortal sin, not just the one you refer to.

He asserted “Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, 'eternal fire.’” (CCC 1035) “Mortal sin … results in the loss of charity and the privation of sanctifying grace, that is, of the state of grace. If it is not redeemed by repentance and God’s forgiveness, it causes exclusion from Christ’s kingdom and the eternal death of hell.” (CCC 1861)
Hello Dave,

Do you have a full quote or source where these words actually came out of the mouth of Pope John Paul II or from a letter he himself wrote? Pope John Paul II simply signing a lengthy renovation of the CCC, with both old and new statements incorporated into it by others, is not exactly the same thing, in my thinking, as preaching hell and damnation from the pulpit, the way Jesus does it. WARNING! Jesus Does Not Forgive All
 
I firmly believe that the only route to heaven is through the grace of the blood of Jesus Christ.

It seems to me that regardless of any differences in gifts of grace, (outside of baptism, reconciliation and all the sacraments) which, according to some people, God bestows on some and not others, it is choices of the human heart which determine a person’s final resting place. Those who freely choose to love God through feeding the poor and obeying His commandments go to heaven through the grace of Jesus’ blood. Those who freely choose to hate Jesus and the Father by not feeding the poor and not obeying God’s commandments go to hell. It is from the free-from-the-will-of-God human heart that good deeds to the poor and obedience to God’s commandments, flows.

NAB SIR 37:17

**The root of all conduct is the mind; four branches it shoots forth: Good and evil, death and life, their absolute mistress is the tongue.****NAB LUK 6:45 **

“A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil. Each man speaks from his heart’s abundance.”
NAB DEU 30:19
"I call heaven and earth today to witness against you:
I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. Choose life,
then, that you and your descendants may live, by loving the LORD, your God, heeding his voice, and holding fast to him." **NAB MAT 7:12 **

" . . . treat others the way you would have them treat you: this sums up the law and the prophets. Enter through the narrow gate. The gate that leads to damnation is wide, the road is clear, and many choose to travel it. But how narrow is the gate that leads to life, how rough the road, and how few there are who find it!" NAB DEU 30:15 The Choice before Israel.

Here then, I have today set before you life and prosperity, death and doom. If you obey the commandments of the LORD, your God, which I enjoin on you today, loving him, and walking in his ways, and keeping his commandments, statutes and decrees, you will live and grow numerous, and the LORD, your God, will bless you in the land you are entering to occupy.” NAB SIR 15:11 Man’s Free Will.

Say not: “It was God’s doing that I fell away”; for what he hates he does not do. Say not: “It was he who set me astray”; for he has no need of wicked man.
Abominable wickedness the LORD hates, he does not let it befall those who fear him. When God, in the beginning, created man, he made him subject to his own free choice. If you choose you can keep the commandments; it is loyalty to do his will. There are set before you fire and water; to whichever you choose, stretch forth your hand. Before man are life and death, whichever he chooses shall be given him.
 
Steven Merten:
Hello Dave,

Do you have a full quote or source where these words actually came out of the mouth of Pope John Paul II or from a letter he himself wrote? Pope John Paul II simply signing a lengthy renovation of the CCC, with both old and new statements incorporated into it by others, is not exactly the same thing, in my thinking, as preaching hell and damnation from the pulpit, the way Jesus does it.
Even when you are shown to be incorrect, you can’t accept it. :rolleyes:

You want to oppose John Paul II no matter what his actual teaching was. You seem intent, no matter the facts, on opposing the teaching of Christ to that of Christ’s Vicar.

John Paul II didn’t “simply sign” the Catechism. He promulgated it as a Acta Apostolicae Sedis (“Act of the Apostolic See”). In other words, it became universally authoritative ONLY because he promulgated it as HIS act. To think this was not John Paul II’s actual teaching is ridiculous and an unconvincing polemic.

For example, I’m in the military, and I have written many letters for the general which the general then signed and sent out as HIS OWN direction. That’s how it works. The letter was my words, but when reviewed and approved by the general and sent out under his signature, then it becomes binding as HIS OWN. Sometimes he makes changes to the letter. Sometimes he doesn’t. Yet, once signed by the general they are no longer my proposed words, but becomes HIS OWN.

According to the Apostolic Letter LAETAMUR MAGNOPERE (1997) signed by John Paul II, which promulgated the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
IT IS A CAUSE FOR GREAT JOY THAT THE LATIN TYPICAL EDITION OF THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS BEING PUBLISHED. It is approved and promulgated by me in this Apostolic Letter and thus becomes the definitive text of the aforementioned Catechism[a] compendium of all Catholic doctrine regarding faith and moralsapproved and promulgated by me… its purpose of being presented as a full, complete exposition of Catholic doctrine, enabling everyone to know what the Church professes, celebrates, lives, and prays in her daily life… [which enables] certain truths of this faith to be formulated in a way more suited to the requirements of contemporary catechetical instruction, ***have been approved by me ***and thus have been incorporated into this Latin typical edition. Therefore it faithfully repeats the doctrinal content which I officially presented to the Church and to the world in December 1992… The Church now has at her disposal this new, authoritative exposition of the one and perennial apostolic faith, and it will serve as a “valid and legitimate instrument for ecclesial communion” and as a “sure norm for teaching the faith,”
Your thesis implies that we should think John Paul II merely signed the document without reviewing or approving its contents. Such a thesis is laughable.
 
Steve Merten,
Pope John Paul II disengaged eternal death anathema Church punishments in 1983 (as I am told).
You were either told incorrectly, or you understood it incorrectly. It is a infallible & immutable dogma of Catholicism, still taught in Catholic universities (eg. by my post-graduate theology professors and textbooks) even today, that hell is everlasting and the all those who die in mortal sin or merely original sin will immediately descend into hell, your false caricature of current Catholic teaching notwithstanding.
 
[Steven Merten]Hello Bishopite,

The point I am making is that the Church stating that infallibility does not allow Church leaders to see who is in hell, as they confirm that they absolutely know canonized saints are in heaven, seems to be only new modern Church thinking. Possibly it would be better if a person like the rich man, who has first hand experience of the fires of hell, to come back and tell us that we do not want to go there. This could be more helpful than the “universal salvation” that modern Popes seem to lean toward.

Scripture also tells us that Korah is burning in hell.
So…first you make the silly claim that Dave and myself shouldn’t be discussing what “grace” is in Catholic theology, but should be focusing on feeding the poor, even though you have NO idea what we do.

And now you claim JPll taught “universal salvation.” It was Catholic theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar who first to proposed the possiblity that Gods mercy is so great that He couldn’t ultimately send anyone to hell, but von Balthasar wasn’t teaching “universal salvation” either and his idea was speculative. JPll NEVER adopted such speculative theology.

JPll knew the CCC better than you and I and it is very silly to think that he didn’t know and BELIEVE this section of it.

**CCC–“1035 The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, “eternal fire.” **The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.”

You seem angry Steve, and your propositions have been shown to be wrong. You should just admit you were incorrect. 🙂
 
40.png
itsjustdave1988:
Even when you are shown to be incorrect, you can’t accept it. :rolleyes:

You want to oppose John Paul II no matter what his actual teaching was. You seem intent, no matter the facts, on opposing the teaching of Christ to that of Christ’s Vicar.

Your thesis implies that we should think John Paul II merely signed the document without reviewing or approving its contents. Such a thesis is laughable.
Hello Dave,

I am not sure what you are saying here. I believe in Jesus teachings and His warnings of eternal damnation. WARNING! Jesus Does Not Forgive All

Do we agree that Jesus many times warns people of eternal damnation for not caring for the poor? I did not hear Pope John Paul II repeating Jesus stern warnings of eternal damnation for those who do not care for the poor from the pulpit. Where are these stern warnings from Pope John Paul II? Please quote them. Can anyone else recall any stern warnings to Catholics from Pope John Paul II repeating Jesus warnings of eternal damnation?

Is not the Church (1.1 billion Catholics) just as guilty as the rich man in the Lazerous story when they murder the poor through failure to come up with enough charity dollers to feed and care for the poor?

Yes. I am sure if you dig through Pope John Paul II “actual teachings” you can find references that hell exists. What you will not find is Pope John Paul II warning Catholics to care for the poor or burn in hell as Jesus saw fit to sternly, loudly and oftenly preach.

LUK 16:19 The Rich Man and Lazarus

"There was a rich man who dressed in purple garments and fine linen and dined sumptuously each day. And lying at his door was a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who would gladly have eaten his fill of the scraps that fell from the rich man’s table. Dogs even used to come and lick his sores. When the poor man died, he was carried away by angels to the bosom of Abraham. The rich man also died and was buried, and from the netherworld, where he was in torment, he raised his eyes and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus at his side. And he cried out, 'Father Abraham, have pity on me. Send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am suffering torment in these flames.’ Abraham replied, ‘My child, remember that you received what was good during your lifetime while Lazarus likewise received what was bad; but now he is comforted here,** whereas you are tormented. Moreover, between us and you a great chasm is established to prevent anyone from crossing who might wish to go from our side to yours or from your side to ours**.’ He said, ‘Then I beg you, father, send him to my father’s house, for I have five brothers, so that he may warn them, lest they too come to this place of torment.’ But Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the prophets. Let them listen to them.’ He said, ‘Oh no, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ Then Abraham said, ‘If they will not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone should rise from the dead.’"NAB MAT 25:41

Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, a stranger and you gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison, and you did not care for me.’ Then they will answer and say, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?’ He will answer them, ‘Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.’ And these will go off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."
 
Steve,

I’ve quoted from John Paul II’s catechism, which is his teaching. Unlike you, he’s concerned about ALL mortal sin, not just the one you’ve latched on to. His warning, for those who have the gift of understanding, is clear, your protesting notwithstanding.
 
Steven,

I’ve done a search of Pope St. Peter’s writings, and I don’t find where St. Peter repeated Jesus stern warnings of eternal damnation for those who do not care for the poor, do you? What does this say of Peter?

What I find sad is your attempt to judge our popes for what they didn’t say. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top