Fatima, the work of satan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter myfavoritmartin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, your right this recognizes Christ as our Saviour as scripture requests
That’s worth a second time, don’t you think?!!!
Yes, your right this recognizes Christ as our Saviour as scripture requests
I’m still swooning. . .

Does this mean that the OP has been answered? The message of Fatima is NOT the work of Satan?!!! Can we pick up our toys and go home?!!!
In Him. 🙂
 
OK, Simon, I don’t think you read my question correctly.
Can you show me that an ECF rejected that Mary is the woman?
Because someone sees the woman as the Church does not necessarily mean they reject that the woman is Mary.

For instance, I see the woman as Mary (I admit to having trouble seeing her in other lights), but I accept that she also represents the Church and Israel as the Church teaches. The woman points to different meanings, each as truthful as the other. There are numerous prophecies in the OT that talk about the destruction of the Temple - pointing to the Jerusalem Temple as well as Jesus. Daniel was an expert at having meanings layered upon meanings.

Simon, you of all people, understand that prophecies have multiple layers.

I call this the “Shrek effect”!!!😉
 
Originally Posted by myfavoritmartinMany, many, many theologians even ecfs dont and ]wont acceptMary there.
This is a strong statement, Simon. And one that I would imagine you can not support. I would challenge you to provide ONE, just one ECF who rejects Mary as the Revelation 12 Woman.

And. . .here’s good link on a little thing called polyvalent symbolism

catholic.com/thisrock/1997/9705chap.asp
 
I will pray for all of us, since this seems to be the only thing that most of us agree is good.🙂
 
God kissed Mary in Galilee. (G.K. Chesterton). So should we.

God Bless!
 
First, let us start with Abraham; he was visited by three angels. Were those angels from God or Satan? God appeared to Moses as a fire on the Holy mountain; was this
Satan or God? Did Jacob really see Gof face to face? Or was it Satan?
Certainly without any hesitation you will say such revelations were from Heaven because they’re found in scriptures. You’re faith in scriptures is like our faith in the Church.Taking the apparitions one by one, without accepting the authority of the Church (or scriptures), there would be ample reasons to believe in the possibility that such apparitions could have come from Satan. For example, God appears to Abraham, in the form of three messengers ( why bring in such confusion if God claims to be One?) God revealing HImself as an unconsuming Fire could be symbolic to the fires of Hell. God wrestling with Jabob is the hardest one to accept. If such event would have happened within the catholic church, I’m certain non catholics would have found this ridiculous in essence…God wrestling with Jacob?
Hey did you read my mind ! 🙂 you just preempted my next post, yes why do people accept the appearances that happened hundreds of years ago and reject one less that 100 years ago, even though everything it predicted happened and still on-going ?
 
I’m going to go actually read the whole thing for myself. I hear about “predictions” that are happening and I suspect, though I’m not certain, that they are probably generalized and vague predictions. The devil can, and has, given generalized predictions.
 
I’m going to go actually read the whole thing for myself. I hear about “predictions” that are happening and I suspect, though I’m not certain, that they are probably generalized and vague predictions. The devil can, and has, given generalized predictions.
The OP asked “Fatima, the work of satan?” not “Fatima, is it too general?”

While, I think everyone here would agree that “predictions” can be specific or generalized, neither would indicate whether the spirit is of God or of satan. I think what we’re looking for here is proof that the message of Fatima is the work of satan, not whether it is general in its prophesy.

So, all that to say. . .Please do read the whole thing for yourself, but keep in mind why you are reading it. It’s not to find out if the prophecies are “general”. . .it’s to determine if the message points us towards Christ.
 
The OP asked “Fatima, the work of satan?” not “Fatima, is it too general?”

While, I think everyone here would agree that “predictions” can be specific or generalized, neither would indicate whether the spirit is of God or of satan. I think what we’re looking for here is proof that the message of Fatima is the work of satan, not whether it is general in its prophesy.

So, all that to say. . .Please do read the whole thing for yourself, but keep in mind why you are reading it. It’s not to find out if the prophecies are “general”. . .it’s to determine if the message points us towards Christ.
The point though, is that if it is general, it is most likely the work of Satan. Thus, I did not stray from the point of the thread.

I disagree. Most likely, a prediction given by God would be precise and exact. If not, there would be other factors that would make one sure it was from God.

As for this one, if it was from God, don’t you think the Church would tell you that it is required belief? And if it’s not required belief, why does anyone believe it in the first place? One way or the other, your Church has to make a stand. They cannot sit on the fence.
 
With regard to the ECF allegedly not seeing Mary in Rev 12

St Augustine:
From a Treatise on the Creed, addressed to Catechumens


Ye are as yet the unborn offspring of a great Mother. Our holy Mother the Church hath by the most sacred Sign of the Cross received you into her womb; and from thence she is now about to bring you forth, a she hath already spiritually brought forth your brethren, with great joy. But until, through the washing of regeneration, she bringeth you forth into the true light, she feedeth you in her womb with such food as becometh your condition, and so in joy matureth her children for the glad moment of her delivery. For this your Mother is not doomed, by the sentence of Eve, to bring forth children in sorrow; which children themselves oftentimes come forth weeping rather than rejoicing. Rather doth your spiritual Mother annul the sentence of your earthly mother: Eve, by disobedience endowed her offspring with death; the Church by obedience, giveth them newness of life. All the mystic prayers and ceremonies which have been and are still being performed over you by the ministry of the servants of God, (the exorcisms, the prayers, the spiritual canticles, the breathings upon, the wearing of haircloth, the prostrations the baring of the feet, the dread which must come over you, even though there is nothing to fear, ) all these things, I say unto you, are the nourishment which ye are drawing from your Mother while as yet ye are in her womb, that at your baptismal birth she may be able to present you strong and laughing babes unto Christ.

Ye have also received the creed, which protecteth your travailing Mother against the venom of the dragon. In the Apocalypse of the Apostle John it is written: And the dragon stood before the Woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as it was born. That this dragon is the devil ye all know. Ye likewise know that by the Woman is signified the Virgin Mary, who, herself a Virgin, bore our Virgin-Head, and who is revealed unto us as a type of the Holy Church; for even as Mary bore a Son and yet remained a Virgin, so the Church doth in all times give birth to her members, and yet is ever presented a chaste virgin to Christ. I have undertaken with God’s help, to expound to you every clause of the Creed, so as to instil what each containeth into your minds. Your hearts also are ready, for the enemy hath been driven out of your hearts.

Ye have made profession of renouncing the enemy. At the moment of that profession it was not before men only, but in the presence of God and his Angels that ye said: I do renounce him. Renounce him, not only in your words, but in your ways; not only with your lips, but in your works. Know ye well that the wrestling which ye have undertaken is a strife with a crafty, ancient, and inveterate foe. Now that ye have once for all renounced him, let him never again give him the right to bring you into bondage. O Christian, thou wilt be caught and exposed, if thou doest act one thing, and yet professest another; if thou art faithful in name, and makest it to be evident by thy works that thou hast broken the Faith pledged by this promise; if somewhile thou goest into a church to pray, and anon to the theatre to join in applauding obscene representations. What hast thou to do any more with the pomps of the devil, which thou hast renounced?
 
Commentary not mine…
Victorinus
Victorinus wrote a commentary on the book of Revelation. We would expect somebody to mention a Marian interpretation of Revelation 12 in such a document, if he held such a view. Instead, Victorinus says that the woman is the people of God, and he goes on at length to contradict numerous details of the Marian interpretation…
This quote is worth contemplation and meets the challenge presented to you. I do, however, have an issue with the unnamed author who included this footnote:
author:
13.* The woman, *p. 355, ver. 1. Compare vol. vi. p. 337, note 4, and Elucidation II. p. 355. It is quite important to observe the voice of antiquity on a matter which, in our own times, has been made a stumbling-block to souls by a wanton, **personal act of the Bishop of Rome and his dogma of the “Immaculate Conception.” **
For whatever it’s worth, that does not seem like a “neutral” comment from an objective source IMHO…
 
Here we are 700+ posts and we still have only two options: the apparitions at Fatima were of the Blessed Mother or of satan. I believe it was the Blessed Mother. The Protestants on this board believe it was satan. Have I left anything out?
 
Here we are 700+ posts and we still have only two options: the apparitions at Fatima were of the Blessed Mother or of satan. I believe it was the Blessed Mother. The Protestants on this board believe it was satan. Have I left anything out?
Just curious do any Catholics accept it as being from satan or uncomfortable and unsettleing?
 
Here we are 700+ posts and we still have only two options: the apparitions at Fatima were of the Blessed Mother or of satan. I believe it was the Blessed Mother. The Protestants on this board believe it was satan. Have I left anything out?
LOL an astute observation. 👍 I don’t think we will ever come to a consensus agreement.

The way I look at it is if it was from God, I may reject it and God won’t be happy with me but He knows I am acting according to what I know from Scripture and am trying to honour my Lord. It is not a sin to doubt if it was Mary. It is hardly on the level of the unpardonable sin, that being stating that the miracles of Jesus were done by satanic power.

But if it is from Satan and I accept it…well then that would be a problem. Better to be safe than sorry…especially when the Church says it’s not even required to believe it.
 
Hey Simon,

I was curious. . .If you now admit that the message of Fatima recognizes Jesus as our Savior, as Scripture prescribes, has your opinion of Fatima changed? And if not, what is your present concern?
 
Just curious do any Catholics accept it as being from satan or uncomfortable and unsettleing?
ACCEPT it as being from Satan??? Shows just how neutral and objective you’re being, Simon!! Why does it automatically have to be from Satan?? Can’t it just be an incorrect but genuine belief, like the belief that the earth is flat or something?

Certainly I accept, as the Church does itself, that Fatima may not be *divine *in nature - saying that the apparitions of Fatima are worthy of belief simply means one doesn’t offend faith or morals or any Church tenets by doing so.

Many choose not to - Catholics as well. If you’d read this thread fully you would have come across at least one or two of them. Doesn’t mean, and doesn’t have to mean, that they think it’s Satanic or are particularly ‘unsettled’ by it. They don’t need to be, neither do you. Personally I’ve seen the many great and positive fruits of a belief in Fatima, so I do believe.

None of this means that belief is required, explicitly or implicitly. Popes and bishops have endorsed and believed that Our Lady appeared at Fatima, but they are far from perfect of course, and they are the first to acknowledge this when pronouncing on apparitions.
 

ACCEPT it as being from Satan??? Shows just how neutral and objective you’re being, Simon!! Why does it automatically have to be from Satan?? Can’t it just be an incorrect but genuine belief, like the belief that the earth is flat or something?

Certainly I accept, as the Church does itself, that Fatima may not be *divine *in nature - saying that the apparitions of Fatima are worthy of belief simply means one doesn’t offend faith or morals or any Church tenets by doing so.

Many choose not to - Catholics as well. If you’d read this thread fully you would have come across at least one or two of them. Doesn’t mean, and doesn’t have to mean, that they think it’s Satanic or are particularly ‘unsettled’ by it. They don’t need to be, neither do you. Personally I’ve seen the many great and positive fruits of a belief in Fatima, so I do believe.

None of this means that belief is required, explicitly or implicitly. Popes and bishops have endorsed and believed that Our Lady appeared at Fatima, but they are far from perfect of course, and they are the first to acknowledge this when pronouncing on apparitions.
Here is the problem Lily…
Some may have given Mary that which is God’s!
They’ve built her up through these visions to “another Mary,” a Mary not found in Scripture.

Today, many are drawn to this “Mary” through the Lady of Fatima, whose publicity has spilled over from the Catholic Church into secular, New Age, and even evangelical circles.
As a result, the character of the true Mary has been buried in the billions of words which proclaim this “other Mary.”

And for me personally it is down right frightful to think how, if it is the work of satan and satan has gotten millions to pay homage to the FM (fatima mary), instead of praying forthright willingly and honestly to God our creator. Then like the bible says correctly(always) B]"he can even disquise himself as the angel of Light"
 
I’m going to go actually read the whole thing for myself. I hear about “predictions” that are happening and I suspect, though I’m not certain, that they are probably generalized and vague predictions. The devil can, and has, given generalized predictions

.
who’syerpappa: That line of yours is a whopper! Is there a book somewhere (or website you’re familiar with) that lists all of the devil’s “generalized predictions.”

I’m thinking the Old Man (a Scots’ term) invented ‘sola scriptura,’ ‘sola fide,’ follow the Jamnian canon which deletes Messiah references and call it Textus Receptus, you know, dispensationism, cafeteria approach to OT ‘laws’ and customs, the Catholic Church as the Whore of Babylon (how ironic of those dumb Catholics: they pick books for their Bible which contradicts their dogma and doctrines!)

I can’t think of any of his (you know, that guy!) “generalized predictions” except for the above listed fruits of Pride (Hey I got it, start your own version of Christianity, King Henry VIII and Martin Luther and John Calvin and John Wesley, you guys know better that the collective wisdom of hundreds of generations of Apostles and those who have succeeded to their teachings!!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top