nope…:nope: :nope::nope:
I agree that nothing was lacking in the sufferings or in the merits of Christ. He alone allowed for a sufficient redemption of mankind. He alone appeased the Father. That is why St Paul, the Catholic Apostle adds: “…for His body, which is the Church…” that the sufferings were wanting and are to be endured by the example of Christ by the faithful, who are members of the body which has the Crucified Christ as the Head.
Christ loves us so much that He is not content to suffer (love) in his own person… he wishes to suffer (love) in his members… thus we fill up what is lacking or wanting in the sufferings of Christ.
Afterall, we are baptised into His Life… and into His Death.
But… at least you responded as best you could.
**I believe you’re making a cutting remark about me. I did answer you. We are baptized into His Life and into His Death. When we become Christians WE ARE DEAD. We are raised to new life IN CHRIST. **
(sarcasm on)
My response comes from the authority of the Church… so it has more credibility than private interpretation… but then you knew that cuz it is in scripture.
(sarcasm off)
(my sarcasm on)
You’d have a point if your Church didn’t make so many gosh darn mistakes. For the last time Mary wasn’t sinless, there is no purgatory, and Mary is not a “co-redemptrix”. What happened is some Pope somewhere came up with these private interpretations, put on a hat, stood in a balcony, and declared that you must believe these things or you will go to hell. Do I really want to submit to such “papal orders”? I don’t think so.
(my sarcasm off)