Well…it’s leaving one rather hampered when on the one hand one wants to have a discussion that impinges upon the theology of revelation and then declares that one of two testaments of Sacred Scripture one is no good at.
The theology of history that derives from the Babylonian exile and the fall of Jerusalem and the southern kingdom provides an archetypal paradigm for the question you ask. The paradigm runs thus:
- God establishes a covenant with His people
- The people are not faithful to the covenant
- God sends prophets to the people to call them to conversion and repentance.
- In so far as there is conversion and repentance, there is restoration, albeit there can yet be very unpleasant consequences.
We encounter this repeatedly in the course of salvation history in the Hebrew Scriptures/Old Testament.
In the case of the Babylonian exile, we have the paradigm as above except that the prophets – notably Jeremiah – who come with a message from the Lord of the need to repent and to abjure infidelity to the covenant. The message is rejected, as is the messenger.
The result is the fall of the Davidic throne, the people being taken away in exile for decades, the destruction and dispoiling of the temple of Solomon. All of these were completely unthinkable from the perspective of the people of God in view of the divine promises that had been made. How did this happen? It engendered an existential crisis, to use a modern term and a modern concept.
God did not destroy the temple but He did not intervene to prevent its destruction. The chain of events in human history were purely predicated on the action of human actors. God, being omniscient, knew thoroughly and absolutely the chain of events and what would or (even could) result from various decisions.
The resolution to the conundrum is ultimately through the prophets God sends to lead the people out of exile, notably Ezekiel, who present that what happened occurred precisely as the fruit of infidelity to the covenant.
War is, as the Virgin articulated, the fruit of sin. Whether it was the war that took the Jewish people to live in Babylon as captives of the victors or whether it was World War I or World War II.
God does not inflict war upon humanity. Humanity inflicts war upon humanity. An event of a person will lead to a result/many results…some of which can be foreseen humanly and others which cannot. Except God. He is omniscient as well as omnipresent.
God can intervene in His providence – which Our Lady said He would do, if the people repented of sin, turn to the Lord in prayer, and ASKED Him to intervene.
This is not unlike the analogy of a human parent. A parent can watch a child, grown or not, make a mistake. They can warn the child not to do something – such as touch a hot stove. If the child reaches out and touches the hot stove, the burn is not the punishment of the parent…it is the consequence of the child touching a hot stove. Of course, the parent knows that the child may remember the consequence as a lesson for future consideration…also concerning matters much more important that putting a finger to a stove.
If people do not ask God to intervene, that violates the theology of secondary causality in what the Church teaches regarding prayer, well articulated by Saint Thomas Aquinas…to wit:
God associates human beings with Himself in the ordering of creation. We do this in various ways, including prayer.
- Human life and human crops rely upon rain; drought conversely is a crisis
- Human beings cannot (at least absolutely, in spite of things like cloud seeding) cause rain. God causes rain through the laws of nature
- We can pray for rain and God conjoins the granting of rain, at times, to our asking for it
- When we pray, we are not telling God something He does not know…He knows we need rain
- When we pray, we are not trying to persuade God to do something against His will by sending rain
- It is not a mercantile transaction…sending the right combination of prayers and sacrifices does not compel God, by means of a bargain, to send rain
- When we pray, we are participating through secondary causality in the rain which He sends. We are co-workers with Him in the order of His creation
- If, on the other hand, we do not ask…because we cannot be bothered, do not believe, choose not to confess our reliance on Him, one can say He “punishes” us by not sending rain but that is a very poor way of expressing it. We are punishing ourselves by not turning to Him in our need and asking Him to send the rain