Fatima

  • Thread starter Thread starter fatimaoligist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pretty poor debunking, mass psychology and mass hallucination? Really? On 70,000 people and seen 30 miles away? That article is rather uninformed.

Yet the author’s understanding is clearly superficial.

👍 Great post to find a skeptic view and link to it. And then make the claim it is a good debunking!:confused:
You have to read the whole article. I thought it was pretty good. The woman’s own mother thought she was a nut, and a fraud. It’s a page long and you mentioned like a few things out of context. I can’t claim to expect anything less from you guys though. 👍
I should have cited a debunking from a catholic source.
 
You have to read the whole article. I thought it was pretty good. The woman’s own mother thought she was a nut, and a fraud. .
The author gave no references as to when the mother said this so this point is very dubious. Certainly it is shown that when one first claims to see something miraculous, people may doubt them and scoff at them. After all, they were jailed over this. Ditto for the Skeptic’s citing what the priest said.
It’s a page long and you mentioned like a few things out of context.
Talking about taking something out of context! See above.
I can’t claim to expect anything less from you guys though. 👍
I should have cited a debunking from a catholic source.
You should have but it hasn’t been debunked, I read this article some time ago. For those really familiar with Fatima, it shows the author has a very limited understanding.

Talking about pictures from the newspaper??

And the author does not even mention the newspaper where the photos came from, O Seculo??

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_F%C3%A1tima

And the author does not even mention that this was covered in the NY Times.

fatima.org/whyfatima.htm
The event was reported in newspapers around the world, including the New York Times.
And the mishmash that the author of the skeptoid article in explaining the photographs is so flawed, you can’t take a direct picture of the sun and the author muddles through talking about rain and umbrellas. His argument is barely coherent.
 
The Skeptoid article states this:
Now let’s go back to those three secrets that the Virgin Mary supposedly revealed to Lucia. The “miracle of the sun” was not one of the three secrets, in fact Lucia wouldn’t tell anyone what the secrets were until many years later, when she was a nun, and was asked to write them down by the Bishop of Leiria in 1941. She would only write the first two. The first secret was a vision of Hell, not really a prediction about anything, nor much of a secret. The second secret was a prediction that World War I would end, and that World War II would start if God continued to be offended by man’s crimes. This wasn’t terribly surprising either, since World War II had already begun when she wrote it.
But Fatima was deemed worthy of belief in 1930.

It’s difficult to assert that this was not disclosed prior to 1941only that Lucia wrote this down in 1941.
 
It’s a fairly good debunking? So you say 70,000 people had a mass hallucination as the author seems to imply??

Yes or No? Because that seems to be his best attempt at debunking.
Absolutely! I like how the author treats it - which I totally agree.
  1. You aren’t reading the whole article - he stated that it was WIDELY PUBLICIZED IN PRINT. There is no need to list every article. C’mon.
  2. We don’t know if there were 70,000 people there. Newspapers reported anywhere from 30,000 to 100,000. The only source we have are photographs, and he states
However, a number of photographs of the crowd do exist, and though it does look like several thousand to me, I certainly wouldn’t go as high as thirty. Either the photographers chose not to show the largest part of the crowds, which seems an odd choice; or the newspapers reported exaggerated numbers.

I know there are algorithms that calculate such things based on know quantities. You could probably plug in the land mass area - the size of an average adult person, and mathematically calculate how many people were there. The photo I saw looks like at the utmost - maybe 20,000, and I’m using my visual guide of being at a football game - where there are endless seas of people, but the stadium only hold 25 thousand - but regardless 70,000 sounds like a gross exaggeration and 100g sounds ludicrous.

Regarding mass hallucination - It’s happened many times. It is especially plausible when the people are already in expectation of something - which he addressed here:
Clearly you’re not going to make a pilgrimage like that unless you’re pretty religious and pretty confident that you’re going to witness a miracle. So, we have a crowd preconditioned to expect to see something.

Have you ever heard of David Copperfield? Thousands of people watched as he made the statue of liberty disappear. People who already knew they were going to a magic show. The power of suggestion is also mind bending. Look at the thousands who reported siting of a UFO over South America on night. The fact that they reported it as a UFO implies that they already knew, and acknowledged this phenomena or they would have looked for other explanations. People who believe in ghosts have an overwhelming probability to see them. Go figure. I don’t believe in ghosts or aliens. Never see either. All of my friends who do - see them all the time!!! Wild!! There are also plenty of reports of mass hysteria
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_hysteria
 
I apologize if I might have come off abrasive ManRay, I have longed questioned the timing of when Lucia made some of these “private revelations” and that time issue has never been answered clearly that I know of,

If the children made it clear in 1917 or the 1920s that “Russia would spread her errors, that a worse war than World War I would come” and also, in that prophecy was the “sky turning blood red” because a worse war was coming but historic fact does have an abnormal Aurora Buorealis seen all over Europe in 1938/1939, actually 2 dates are used.

I guess the book hasn’t been written proving conclusively the pro-Miracle-Fatima side because too many people are all tied up about the 3rd Secret.

That said, Lucia still by witnesses sealed an envelope to not be opened until 1960 with the 3rd Secret and interestingly, Vatican II happened in 1962 and some people, your Traditionalists might point to that date as a decline in the Church if I can say that.
 
The “Mass Hallucination” explanation is hardly even necessary, since it implies a premise that we are under no obligation to accept in the first place.

Notwithstanding that we don’t even have a clear picture of just how many people were present to witness this “miracle” (A few thousand? 10,000? 30,000? 70,000? 100,000?), we don’t have a clear picture of what any great portion of that crowd saw. We do know that certain people in the crowd that day reported seeing nothing unusual at all (a fact that often goes ignored by Fatima believers). We also know that many self-reports from supposed witnesses to the miracle were not gathered until decades after the event (in the books of John De Marchi - a Catholic priest).

I would happily grant you, that if even only a few thousand people were present at Fatima, and they were all reliably reported seeing the same miraculous event, that this would be quite compelling evidence. But that isn’t the playing field we’re dealing with. We don’t know how many people saw anything, much less what they really saw. But we do know that some people who reported seeing something had over 20 years to potentially compare notes with their neighbors and get their stories straight.

At any rate, “Mass Hallucination” doesn’t mean that everyone has the exact same hallucination. The social effects of mob-think are long and well-documented. Gather a mob of people together who desperately want something to true, and then get enough people in that group to think their beliefs are being confirmed, and eventually you reach a tipping point that pushes everyone else over as well. You see this play out in faith healing shows all the time.
 
I apologize if I might have come off abrasive ManRay, I have longed questioned the timing of when Lucia made some of these “private revelations” and that time issue has never been answered clearly that I know of,

If the children made it clear in 1917 or the 1920s that “Russia would spread her errors, that a worse war than World War I would come” and also, in that prophecy was the “sky turning blood red” because a worse war was coming but historic fact does have an abnormal Aurora Buorealis seen all over Europe in 1938/1939, actually 2 dates are used.

I guess the book hasn’t been written proving conclusively the pro-Miracle-Fatima side because too many people are all tied up about the 3rd Secret.

That said, Lucia still by witnesses sealed an envelope to not be opened until 1960 with the 3rd Secret and interestingly, Vatican II happened in 1962 and some people, your Traditionalists might point to that date as a decline in the Church if I can say that.
No worries mate. I don’t have a problem with reported miracles one way or another. I just don’t reason that they exist in the sense that others do. I’m a spiritual person in the way that I know something caused the world, and I find it stupefying. But I relish the ability to state that I have no idea by what or why. I find that the world that exists in my time and space is mind blowing enough. As the old saying goes - I can appreciate the beauty of a garden without believing there are fairies at the bottom of it. The christian concept is a little too absurd for me, and I don’t mean that in an offensive way.
 
The “Mass Hallucination” explanation is hardly even necessary, since it implies a premise that we are under no obligation to accept in the first place.

Notwithstanding that we don’t even have a clear picture of just how many people were present to witness this “miracle” (A few thousand? 10,000? 30,000? 70,000? 100,000?), we don’t have a clear picture of what any great portion of that crowd saw. We do know that certain people in the crowd that day reported seeing nothing unusual at all (a fact that often goes ignored by Fatima believers). We also know that many self-reports from supposed witnesses to the miracle were not gathered until decades after the event (in the books of John De Marchi - a Catholic priest).

I would happily grant you, that if even only a few thousand people were present at Fatima, and they were all reliably reported seeing the same miraculous event, that this would be quite compelling evidence. But that isn’t the playing field we’re dealing with. We don’t know how many people saw anything, much less what they really saw. But we do know that some people who reported seeing something had over 20 years to potentially compare notes with their neighbors and get their stories straight.

At any rate, “Mass Hallucination” doesn’t mean that everyone has the exact same hallucination. The social effects of mob-think are long and well-documented. Gather a mob of people together who desperately want something to true, and then get enough people in that group to think their beliefs are being confirmed, and eventually you reach a tipping point that pushes everyone else over as well. You see this play out in faith healing shows all the time.
You explained it better than me. I was thinking of those experiments where someone runs out in the street and points to a plane or something that is hard to make out, and everyone on the sidewalk will invariably look up. If you start publicly describing it in certain ways - I wonder how many people go home that day convinced they saw a UFO?
 
I consider myself an atheist, but it would be more likely to say that I am an atheist when it comes to the Judeo-Christian God. There are many other things that most atheists reject that I am simply agnostic about. For example, the afterlife, or certain “supernatural” (although I would propose that supernatural is meaningless, because ultimately everything that exists must have a natural source) phenomena, such as the Miracle of the Sun.

I’ve never read an explanation for the miracle at Fatima, so I am forced to say that I can’t explain it. That doesn’t mean that God did it, however. For all I know it could be aliens playing a practical joke on us - unlikely, yes, but no more so than a god playing tricks.

So that’s my ultimate answer: I don’t know! But just because something seems inexplicable doesn’t mean it is supernatural. Just as an example: there is pretty good evidence that some sort of being was present in Point Pleasant, West Virginia, from 1966-67 which was not a human and not any known animal. The being, nicknamed “mothman” was seen by multiple independent eyewitnesses over a year, including several people who claimed they were chased in their car by it (it flew), a woman who was so traumatized when she sighted it that she dropped her baby and was sent into shock from terror, and a man whose dog was reportedly killed by it.

I have never read an explanation for the mothman sightings that satisfied me either. However, does that mean I suddenly should start to believe everyone who says they saw bigfoot, UFOs, or were abducted by aliens? Certainly not, and I’m sure that you won’t either. That’s why I’m not going to suddenly start believing in God, angels, demons, seraphim, cherubim, thrones, powers, principalities, virgin births, assumptions into heaven, and all that just because there exists a seemingly miraculous event which I can’t explain.
 
The “Mass Hallucination” explanation is hardly even necessary, since it implies a premise that we are under no obligation to accept in the first place.

]Notwithstanding that we don’t even have a clear picture of just how many people were present to witness this “miracle” (A few thousand? 10,000? 30,000? 70,000? 100,000?), we don’t have a clear picture of what any great portion of that crowd saw.
And how many people were at Woodstock? A half million?

10,000? Please point out a source that says that. As I say towards the end of this post, the military of the secular government of Portugal was trying to keep people from even going to Fatima.

Most of us don’t want to exaggerate anything but I haven’t heard figures as small as 30,000 or 10,000.
We do know that certain people in the crowd that day reported seeing nothing unusual at all (a fact that often goes ignored by Fatima believers). We also know that many self-reports from supposed witnesses to the miracle were not gathered until decades after the event (in the books of John De Marchi - a Catholic priest).
I would happily grant you, that if even only a few thousand people were present at Fatima, and they were all reliably reported seeing the same miraculous event, that this would be quite compelling evidence. But that isn’t the playing field we’re dealing with. We don’t know how many people saw anything, much less what they really saw. But we do know that some people who reported seeing something had over 20 years to potentially compare notes with their neighbors and get their stories straight.
Not sure about this, “Meet the witnesses” does relay wide accounts and the accounts to cross check and again, this was reported in newspapers including O Seculo and of course, the NY Times and seen from 30 miles away.
At any rate, “Mass Hallucination” doesn’t mean that everyone has the exact same hallucination. The social effects of mob-think are long and well-documented. Gather a mob of people together who desperately want something to true, and then get enough people in that group to think their beliefs are being confirmed, and eventually you reach a tipping point that pushes everyone else over as well. You see this play out in faith healing shows all the time.
Not sure about this “mob-think”, Francisco and Jacinta, two of the seers were killed by Influenza so common in 1919, the Spanish flu I believe that was such a killer. Then on top of that Portugal was involved in World War I and lost soldiers and though they were not involved in World War II, all of these along with the Spanish Civil War are very significant events to think decades later, witnesses got their stories straight with each other.

For 1917, it sounds well documented for the time:
Columnist Avelino de Almeida of O Século (Portugal’s most influential newspaper, which was pro-government in policy and avowedly anti-clerical),[3] reported the following: “Before the astonished eyes of the crowd, whose aspect was biblical as they stood bare-headed, eagerly searching the sky, the sun trembled, made sudden incredible movements outside all cosmic laws - the sun ‘danced’ according to the typical expression of the people.”[10] Eye specialist Dr. Domingos Pinto Coelho, writing for the newspaper Ordem reported “The sun, at one moment surrounded with scarlet flame, at another aureoled in yellow and deep purple, seemed to be in an exceeding fast and whirling movement, at times appearing to be loosened from the sky and to be approaching the earth, strongly radiating heat”.[11] The special reporter for the October 17, 1917 edition of the Lisbon daily, O Dia, reported the following, “…the silver sun, enveloped in the same gauzy purple light was seen to whirl and turn in the circle of broken clouds…The light turned a beautiful blue, as if it had come through the stained-glass windows of a cathedral, and spread itself over the people who knelt with outstretched hands…people wept and prayed with uncovered heads, in the presence of a miracle they had awaited. The seconds seemed like hours, so vivid were they.”[12]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_F%C3%A1tima

And in fact, I don’t think it matters that much to synchronize the stories between the witnesses there, a God could allow each of us to see whatever he chooses us to see in how all things would be possible with God.

Considering the timeline, 1952 was when the movie “Miracle of Our Lady of Fatima” came out : amazon.com/Miracle-Our-Lady-Fatima-VHS/dp/6300270998 which basically has these accounts in it, considering movies were still silent in 1917, a rural area, 2 World Wars, an epidemic that killed millions world wide, the Spanish Civil War and that the Vatican had deemed this apparition worthy of belief only 13 years after 1930, 1952 doesn’t seem too long a time to make a movie of the full version in English.

The church always takes time in approving an apparition but this one was approved in 1930 after occurring in 1917.

So, what we would really need to look at would be the Vatican documents themselves on witness accounts because what you say about witnesses getting their stories straight does not readily appear to be the case.

Also, just like the movie said, Military soldiers were actually trying to prevent the people from going to the reputed appartions site.
In the middle of the road a force of infantry and cavalry of the Republican guard was preventing the people from passing, or completing the remaining one and three quarter miles which separate Fatima from the Cova. I asked some bystanders whether anyone had in fact passed. Until midday, I was told, everyone had gone through, but then the mayor had arrived and forbidden it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_F%C3%A1tima
 
Newspaper accounts are something.

Let’s take another subject, IF the newspapers in Roswell New Mexico did not report that the Air Force actually said a UFO crashed in the desert near there, I doubt if now, 60 years later, there would still be debate and so many people who believe a UFO crashed at Roswell…

But the newspapers first reported that.

yourememberthat.com/files/a5ae03a5c3edf6d5.jpg
 
a great deal of the author’s assertions are based on the assumption that everyone there wanted to see a miracle. i’m pretty skeptical of absolutes. that doesn’t sound right to me and the author supplies no evidence to support it, although i know that such evidence would be an attempt at proving a negative. still, the author doesn’t even try. then as now, there were those who will go pretty far to prove others wrong. if there was only a few there who didn’t want to see a miracle and was there as a skeptic, there would be reports that said that nothing occurred. i can’t find one. i agree that the mob mentality is a valid argument against the miracle of fatima, but it doesn’t go very far.

as i already stated, the miracle of fatima, if real, neither proves nor disproves anything already held by catholics. there are plenty of faithful in full communion with the church who are very skeptical of the stories of fatima and reject it entirely. that’s perfectly okay. non-catholics often have some kind of view that disproving fatima is akin to disproving catholicism. the truth is that we have nothing riding on it. like every other event that is deemed worthy of belief by the church, nothing is added and nothing is taken away from the deposit of faith already in the holy tradition and the holy bible. if it were disproven, if fatima was rejected by the catholic church, then still nothing would change.

that’s why i use quantity when i argue with skeptics and non-catholics about the miracles that have been deemed worthy of belief by the church, although i generally argue along other lines since any one of these, if disproven, don’t disprove the church and thus lose strength to prove the church. using a wide range of miracles and seeing patterns within these very disparate events is more effective, i think, than pinning all your logic on just one of them.
 
a great deal of the author’s assertions are based on the assumption that everyone there wanted to see a miracle. i’m pretty skeptical of absolutes. that doesn’t sound right to me and the author supplies no evidence to support it, although i know that such evidence would be an attempt at proving a negative. still, the author doesn’t even try. then as now, there were those who will go pretty far to prove others wrong. if there was only a few there who didn’t want to see a miracle and was there as a skeptic, there would be reports that said that nothing occurred. i can’t find one. i agree that the mob mentality is a valid argument against the miracle of fatima, but it doesn’t go very far.

as i already stated, the miracle of fatima, if real, neither proves nor disproves anything already held by catholics. there are plenty of faithful in full communion with the church who are very skeptical of the stories of fatima and reject it entirely. that’s perfectly okay. non-catholics often have some kind of view that disproving fatima is akin to disproving catholicism. the truth is that we have nothing riding on it. like every other event that is deemed worthy of belief by the church, nothing is added and nothing is taken away from the deposit of faith already in the holy tradition and the holy bible. if it were disproven, if fatima was rejected by the catholic church, then still nothing would change.

that’s why i use quantity when i argue with skeptics and non-catholics about the miracles that have been deemed worthy of belief by the church, although i generally argue along other lines since any one of these, if disproven, don’t disprove the church and thus lose strength to prove the church. using a wide range of miracles and seeing patterns within these very disparate events is more effective, i think, than pinning all your logic on just one of them.
Father John De Marchi or others have written that yes, there seems to be at least 1 case of someone who did not see anything.

But this brings us to how Fatima is chronicled, an event occurring in 1917 in what must have been a backwater rural locale in Portugal though if O Seculo and others sent reporters, events surrounding the area must have been thought to be newsworthy but I don’t dispute that it is reported that some did not see anything.
 
It’s really a book that needs to be written as I said, a defense of Fatima on its merits.

But instead, some have taken everything to talk about the 3rd Secret.

If as I believe the EWTN article says, there have been cures, if those cures have been validated by the Church, we need to hear about these.

Also of interest is that Jacinta, one of the seers is reportedly “incorrupt.”

miraclehunter.com/marian_apparitions/approved_apparitions/vatican.html

miraclehunter.com/marian_apparitions/approved_apparitions/fatima/index.html
 
Quoting CRI??? Those people are known anti-Catholics.

And really carry less water than the many affirmations of visits by the Holy Mother of God per miracles and conversions.
Not so, CRI holds to the positions that the RCC is authentically Christian, all be it w/heresies.
 
I guess one of my biggest problems is that we are talking about the Sun. If it’s a waste of time trying to explain that people didn’t see the sun ripped from the heavens…it’s even harder to explain that the rest of world wouldn’t see it too. We are talking about the sun. We all see the same sun.

Testimony alone is not sufficient in regards to establishing a miracle, unless that testimony is of the kind, that it’s falsehood would be even more miraculous than the fact it wishes to establish…Hume

If the sun did actually move, dance, or whatever in reality - it would seem that it would probably have destroyed the earth - so if not we are talking about a pure vision…Something that wasn’t real - but experienced as real apparently. It’s very strange. Hard to really swallow.

Also the poster that claimed the article presumes that people went there with a prior notion of what they would see as being false would have to answer then - why did they go there? That doesn’t really make sense.
 
I guess one of my biggest problems is that we are talking about the Sun. If it’s a waste of time trying to explain that people didn’t see the sun ripped from the heavens…it’s even harder to explain that the rest of world wouldn’t see it too. We are talking about the sun. We all see the same sun.

Testimony alone is not sufficient in regards to establishing a miracle, unless that testimony is of the kind, that it’s falsehood would be even more miraculous than the fact it wishes to establish…Hume

If the sun did actually move, dance, or whatever in reality - it would seem that it would probably have destroyed the earth - so if not we are talking about a pure vision…Something that wasn’t real - but experienced as real apparently. It’s very strange. Hard to really swallow.

Also the poster that claimed the article presumes that people went there with a prior notion of what they would see as being false would have to answer then - why did they go there? That doesn’t really make sense.
People saw the Sun dance from 30 miles away. God can do anything.

Why would people go there?? To see Miracles, to hope to get a glimpse of the divine. Why do people go to Lourdes nowadays? Many for a cure of a serious ailment while others may go just for spiritual reasons, a renewal of the spirit.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lourdes_Medical_Bureau

Lourdes cures are examined by a medical board to determine their authenticity.

See, this is what I meant in reading the “skeptoid” article, the author is working in a bit of a different sphere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top