A
ASimpleSinner
Guest
This is a valid enough point, and certainly one that allows an apologist to hunker down in the “we alone are the faithful remnant argument” Answering that can take days, weeks, months, years, decades, centuries… In the course of time it would be expected or hoped that the faithful remnant in fact would grow and gain greater strength - a sign of Providence and blessing. Using it to confirm the righteousness of that which is not… At some point we begin to scratch our heads and wonder why this mockery of error, the Catholic Church, gained 300M members during the pontificate of JP2 alone.Do numbers matter that much? Whether a significant number of people are converting to Orthodoxy or not has nothing to di with the truth of Orthodoxy. Were the True Church to be forced into the catacombs again, would the number of heretics attest to the validity of their communion?
Who said anything about “lack of committment to learning chant”?? They were very committed and did just that!How hard did these Anglican converst struggle to learn chants from the “Middle East”? Does a lack of committment to learning chant equal a reason to abandon the truth? Would an evangelican Christian who struggled to learn Gregorian Chant(in Latin) be justified in leaving Roman Catholicism because of the difficulty? You would think a group consisting of a significant number of ex-Anglicans so teid to their cultural heritage would make an effort to practice Western Rite Orthodoxy before they would leave the Orthodox Church based on cultural ties.
I didn’t say they were ex-Anglicans, I said they were Anglos/Cuacasians. The Western Rite is a matter that is of no small amount of controversy, and we could and would do well to start another thread.
Casting subtle aspersions on how genuine they were seems odd. That wasn’t the point. The point was that at some point this gent experienced a disconnect and recognized an odd sort of pride in the fact that this small community mightily attempting to adopt the prayer styles from another culture and were satisfied at coffee hour how they weren’t western and involved in all the attendent problems found down the street at the local Catholic parish…
He didn’t leave Orthodoxy because it was too difficult or because he was uncommitted. He had questions and saw issues that were not resolved otherwise.
Why do you create the dichotomy of someone is either running or someone is sincere. Many are both.You seem to give examples of people running away from the liturgical and spiritual mess they experienced in their old communion as true examples; as opposed to sincere converts searching for the truth. Yes, people converting for those reasons may well have a general five year lifespan - probably similar to the lifespan of a convert to Roman Catholicism who converted for similar reasons.
I am not sure the point here. Growth and retention seem to be imperative for missions. In fact we just haven’t seen this on the level popularly reported. Folks who make effort to point to “In my area Orthodox parishes like to say a quarter of their members are former Catholics.” seem to be pushing the envelope in suggesting more of the boom than there really is or was. To what end, I am not sure. The fact is, you go to any non-Catholic group and as a function of their being 55+M people in the US with some affiliation (even if it was just baptism) with the Catholic Church, you are going to find converts from it.Again, regarding numbers: we here in the US like to imagine ourselves as the example by which all are judged. We are only slightly over 200 years old as a country. Compare 200 years to the 2000 years that Christianity has existed! The Slavs were converted, what, about a thousand years ago? So for about one-thousand years they lived in darkness while significant parts of the world were being converted to Christianity.
No. This is, however an odd point to make. I wasnt claiming we had been successful in establishing a majority… So I am not sure where you are going with that one.How big of an impact has Roman Catholicism really made on the traditionally protestant USA? Outside of the ethnic groups whose culture has closely linked them with Roman Catholicism; eg. Italians, Irish, Polish, Spanish… how greatly has the Roman Catholic Church managed to hold onto Catholics, or even moreso “convert the land”, as it were, to Catholicism? Look at demographics… look at the number of people coming to the US from traditionally Catholic countries and cultures compared to the number of immigrants coming from traditionally Orthodox countries… have either of us gained a majority in this land?
On this we agree.As it is, neither traditionally Roman Catholic nor traditionally Orthodox countries have nearly high enough a regular rate of Mass and Divine Liturgy attendance on Sundays as compared to the population who associate themselves with either communion.
On this I agree.We both do the best we can, and work tirelesly to convert people and build Christ’s Church. “Repo Man”, investigate Orthodoxy further, and do not only the homework but, pray ceaselesly that the Lord will guide you. May God bless you on your journey!![]()