L
LDNCatholic
Guest
Also, I would say that because it encompasses Christian, Islamic and Animist tribes, education will be further hindered by disagreements between the religions. For instance an animist village will likely be extremely resistant to education from a Muslim or Christian, someone they see as a missionary come to destroy their way of life.That’s exactly why the approach needs to be something other than the “Western people imposing Truth and Justice on the rest of the World” tactic. You’re right- there’s no way traditional parents are going to let their daughters go off to “let’s end clitorectomy” classes any more than I’m going to let my daughter attend Planned Parenthood-sponsored sex education classes.
This needs to be more of a grassroots sort of effort. There needs to be a change of the culture, while still allowing the culture to express itself. I’m not even entirely sure that an outside group can do it at all.
Consider the practice of foot-binding in China. It was originally a display of conspicuous consumption, of prosperity. It was a way to say that you were so wealthy you could effectively cripple a worker. It was limited to aristocracy. Then, it slowly became a status symbol down through the social classes until you had women in the peasant class, who DID have to work, with bound feet.
It was the Communist government, and not missionaries or outside charitable organizations, that finally ended the practice. By making displays of conspicuous consumerism undesirable, the practice slowly ended.
That’s how the change has to occur here, I think. The whole mindset, that women shouldn’t be allowed to enjoy sex, that they are the property of their husbands, needs to be changed- then the practice will, perhaps die out.
Maybe they should all be given courses in Theology of the Body?
But yes, the whole practice, and how to best change it, is a complex and terrible one.