Feminisms effect on women

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pope_Gregory
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Once again, what do any of you think should be done? Solution oriented as opposed to fear oriented?

Peace,
Ed
 
Once again, what do any of you think should be done? Solution oriented as opposed to fear oriented?
Somehow, the male of the species needs to become more marketable - rather than most consideration being given to just how very, very naughty the female of the species is to be rejecting designs that were last popular (with advertisers, anyway) over 50 years ago, marketers need to come to terms with the fact that the designs (never very realistic in long-term use) are just past their sell-by date (by decades).
 
There is this company that I know of that was a buisness owned only by men. They seemed to hate women and it would actually effect the working enviornment of the company as well as the abuse of other workers.

I used to work for a few companys earlier back on that had men who were male chauvenist pigs in some higher power positions. And again it made it miserable for some of the workers. So it brings up the question. If chauvenism is so good in these peoples eyes and so “liberating” why are they themselves so miserable and rude to other people? Because it seems every chauvenist I have met or heard of has been mean and rude to the bone to people. They seem like extremely unhappy miserable people and have a hatred for people who are religious it seems.

Now if chauvenism is such a wonderful movement in the eyes of these men, why are they themselves so miserable and angry towards society? On the job I know some chauvenists who have made it miserable for certains workers simply because they were a woman In fact in general, for myself, it seems nearly everyone I and my friends have had problems with in the workplace from companys in the past were people who were secular and not even religious, let alone Catholic. It seems their immoral ways in their life does effect other people in life who are good hard working God fearing people. And that is a sad thing.

I think its a why we need to bring God back in schools. Because this is what secular society spits out. Cold, hard, uncaring, secular people who would stab their mothers in the back if they were offered enough. This “secular” mindset creates problems later in life for people who are honest and good and unfortunatly have to deal with such people in life.
Just having a little fun w/ your post so you see that anything taken to an exteme is usually unpleasant~and that includes religious fervor, traditional values, intolerance for change and individual differences.

There is nothing inherently threatening about a woman-owned business. I know, my mother has been a small business owner for the past 25 years and I can’t imagine anyone describing her or her employees as you did above, nor can I imagine she would have survived in business for 25 years with that kind of approach. Be careful about painting with too broad a brush when you encounter a bad situation~you risk looking just as bitter and unreasonable as the folks you’re criticizing.
 
Oh, I got it alright. Instead of solving any of the problems between men and women, NOW declared war. “Sisters! Throw off the chains of your oppresion!” Eternal victimhood is all they offered women. Fear and mistrust. Healing the wounds was out of the question.

This is wrong. This is unBiblical.

God bless,
Ed
On the contrary, the “war” fought by NOW has enabled women to largely take their place alongside men as equals in the workplace. Today, female and male employees are largely considered fungible by most employers due to that struggle. Instead of victimhood, their struggle opened the doors to millions of young women who reap the benefits of feminism daily. I would wager less women are victimized today than were in the 1950’s for the simple reason that more women have the skills needed to live on their own and therefore the ability to walk out of a bad marriage. Even having that ability to walk, I would guess, improves her lot in life because her partner can’t simply take it for granted that she will put up with anything.
 
Then why get married in the first place? Should lawyers be on hand in case a woman wants to date a man?

The equality you talk about is not a truly functional equality but a description of a power struggle involving money. This is unBiblical.

The correct, Biblical approach involves trust, understanding, commitment and true love, not the Sex and the City variety that turns women into predatory fornicators, like the men they were not supposed to imitate.

Love involves commitment and is not always easy, especially when imperfect human beings are involved. Too much emphasis is placed on sex and almost none on building a real relationship based on compatibility, trust and understanding. This should be the goal of both men and women. This is Biblical. This is what should be promoted.

God bless,
Ed
 
Then why get married in the first place? Should lawyers be on hand in case a woman wants to date a man?

The equality you talk about is not a truly functional equality but a description of a power struggle involving money. This is unBiblical.

The correct, Biblical approach involves trust, understanding, commitment and true love, not the Sex and the City variety that turns women into predatory fornicators, like the men they were not supposed to imitate.

Love involves commitment and is not always easy, especially when imperfect human beings are involved. Too much emphasis is placed on sex and almost none on building a real relationship based on compatibility, trust and understanding. This should be the goal of both men and women. This is Biblical. This is what should be promoted.
I’m sure that’s all terribly interesting and all that but the problem is that you’ve got to sell it to a skeptical market - sitting in a corner of the internet moaning ‘Ain’t it awful’ isn’t going to do it for you, would be my guess.

How are you going to do that?
 
“sell”? This isn’t Marketing 101 and my comments were meant to be taken to heart by anyone here who might be interested.

God bless,
Ed
 
I know many old women who grew up in the early 1900s who said women were alot happier back then and had much better values and respect for others.
And isn’t it surprising? They weren’t able to go out and work a full time job and then come home and expect hubby was going to help with the kids and housework. How deprived! Stuck at home with only children to talk to and no second eight to ten hours outside the home.

Does it ever occur to anyone that some of these b***hs are so sleep deprived, even a saint would be ornery. Most of us guys, even those who put in extra hours and don’t use their vacations don’t hold down two full time jobs. A good many of our female co-workers do just that.

Never the less, I have seen and experienced some of the behaviors ya’all describe and sometimes it’s by single women who thought they had it all and it has turned to ashes. Deep disappointment can do that to anyone including guys. 🤷
 
“sell”? This isn’t Marketing 101 and my comments were meant to be taken to heart by anyone here who might be interested.
But you seemed terribly interested in getting into the ‘solution oriented’ but all I’ve seen is ‘ain’t it awful’. I’m genuinely interested in your thoughts as to practical steps of getting wherever you think we ought to be going - together with how you think you’re going to sell it to a highly skeptical audience.

If you can’t sell it, how on earth do you expect anybody to buy it?

Could it really be that all you have to offer is ‘ain’t it awful’?
 
But you seemed terribly interested in getting into the ‘solution oriented’ but all I’ve seen is ‘ain’t it awful’. I’m genuinely interested in your thoughts as to practical steps of getting wherever you think we ought to be going - together with how you think you’re going to sell it to a highly skeptical audience.

If you can’t sell it, how on earth do you expect anybody to buy it?

Could it really be that all you have to offer is ‘ain’t it awful’?
I honestly don’t know what the complaints are all about anyway. Women came up with their own solution. To change themselves, get educated and participate in the politics and economics. The sex thing is really irrelavent. Ater all, prostitution was the only other option that women had other than marriage. Men fornicate, women fornicate. This perpatration that one sex is morally superior than another at some point in time is silly.In fact, it’s downright oppresive. I’m sure alot of men like to hold women up to these rediculous standards. But Feminism is about the right of a woman to be her own person and use her own mind. Women have come to their own solutions. I think it’s alot of men who are still playing catch up to the dramatic shift. All they need do is adjust a little. The OP described these bussiness women as angry which I think is off. They are probably acting like stern bosses are supposed to act. Secondly, women no longer need men for financial support. So the “aggression” you are referring to may be the fact that they are not sexually receptive to you. It may just be indifference.

Here’s an example:
Over the summer I worked at a retail store. there were two youngmen who started the same time I did. Howevver, we did not share a work ethic. I was always on time or early. They were always late. They didn’t work very hard and neither had taken much advatage of their education or saught to improve their career opportunities. I had problems with both these young men.
One, after repeatedly rebuffing his propositions, continued to ask me for “back rubs” for NO other reason than the fact that I was female. I would kindly remind him of sexual harassment laws and that his behavior is inappropriate. The other youngman was confrontational for no other reason than the way that I spoke. You see, When you are both urban and the same skin color, There is an expectation as a female how you carry yourself and speak. He spoke in a very basic DC dialect and I spoke the way any girl who attends years of Private catholic school should. Apparently this was threatning to him so he treated me like the OP judges these women he works with. We just want to work and go home. He aren’t there to be your buddy. I’m sure many of the men there aren’t either

This is a race class sex issue. The idea that things were “better” before feminism is just absurd. I’m sure Ed wouldn’t mind accusing the victimhood arguement against discriminated ethnic groups as well. Women simply stood up and said “NO”.
The truth is we are already are doing what needs to be done. But Ed what are YOU doing? You accuse women of being “victimized” which I’m sure many women don’t even think in those terms. More like I can do anything if I work hard enough at it and darned what men think I CAN’T do. I think men need to be less fixated on what women can and cannot, should and shouldn’t do and be more fixated on what they themselves should be doing. They also need to be less fixated on anyone else’s morality but their own. Over fixation on a woman’s virtue often leads men to neglect their own.
 
Sad. I’ve given the solution but people are reading past it like I didn’t write it. It’s in the Bible. It’s not about sex or politics. It’s about true love - real love. Not Sex and the City.

You can have your power fantasies that revolve around the idea that the only time women will be “equal” to men is when they become men. Power and money are not the answer.

The answer, once again, is real love between men and women. Real caring, real understanding and real respect. It’s in the Bible.

God bless,
Ed
 
Sad. I’ve given the solution but people are reading past it like I didn’t write it. It’s in the Bible.
Ed, I am curious but perplexed. Could you spell out this solution?
The answer, once again, is real love between men and women. Real caring, real understanding and real respect.
I think this is everyone’s goal, and a lot of folks find such love. Why do you think feminism prevents it?
 
Sad. I’ve given the solution but people are reading past it like I didn’t write it. It’s in the Bible. It’s not about sex or politics. It’s about true love - real love. Not Sex and the City.

You can have your power fantasies that revolve around the idea that the only time women will be “equal” to men is when they become men. Power and money are not the answer.

The answer, once again, is real love between men and women. Real caring, real understanding and real respect. It’s in the Bible.

God bless,
Ed
So, let’s see if I’m getting you straight here, what you’re telling us is that you’re going with a cliché-driven model?

The thing is, Ed, that nobody outside the terminally dreary buys the ‘only time women will be “equal” to men is when they become men’ cliché - what doesn’t seem to be dawning on you is that the problem isn’t a problem with the female of the species, it’s predominantly a problem with the male of the species and a failure to adapt to the consequences of a technological/economic revolution.

You can’t have your old world back, Ed, capitalism doesn’t need it any more.
 
Well, consider this for one. You are a woman (no joke) who graduated college and are looking for a job in sales. You are hired and start a new job. Once you get there you notice some stuff - that the women seem to sometimes work harder while the men seem to get away with much more (more breaks, coming in late, leaving early, talking too much). Not only that, say you come accross information that even though you and Christopher were hired at the same time and have the same experience, you are paid $11 while he is paid $16. You wonder how can this be? You ask around and discover that almost all the women in your company make much less than the men even with the same education and experience.

This angers because your husband just walked out of your family and you haven’t seen a penny of child support in 3 months - things are stretched thin and you can barely pay the bills. Guys like the ones I described above get paid more than you for the same job, and (if) they (are divorced) don’t sometimes pay their child support. Thus they have more money and they are unwilling to use it to help with the raising of their children both physically and with money for support (this or that is more important to them).

Whenever an opportunity came up, you have to snatch it and work to beat all others so that you can be successfull - just to get the same pay and acknowledgment of men co-workers who are paid more in the first place and who are not as ambitious. This make you look like a femanist freak.

Now I ask you, does this seem right to you? Why do men always look at ambition women as witches and femanists when she’s just perhaps trying to earn her way through life for her kids sake when she’s getting help from no one including her ex who makes more money than her, doesn’t contribute to his kids and never even gives up time to help with his kids either? You can say you would never do this, but men sometimes need to wake up this is the real world out there and it happens!

Now a single lady out there just trying to destroy men out there - that’s a different story, but not all “femanist” women can be lumped together.

I don’t see how any of this however has to do with schools. It is the parents jobs to teach their kids morals and values.
 
They were never really appreciated to begin with.** Before feminism, things were awful,** women just repressed their anger.I wouldn’t say after feminism because things are still being worked on. It’s an ongoing process. Perhaps, one day America will stop penalizing women for bringing life into the world because feminism is exalting and appreciation of womens’ qualities, not putting them down.
What do you base this broad, sweeping assessment on? We all have personal stories to bring to the table. Yours appears to center on the difficult experiences of your grandmother and mother, both of whom had the difficult challenge of overcoming racism. My ancestral history is quite different from your’s, and not because we were affluent or elitist. If you do your homework, you will see that the early feminist movement was INDEED an elitist movement. It has never been about reaching the average woman. Still isn’t today - despite the pc rhetoric.
I wouldn’t say that men are the enemy but chauvanism is.
You may not say it, but ed was correct in his selection of quotes from the “mothers” of the feminist movement. One need only read the early books written by Frieden, Steinman, Robin Morgan, Andrea Dworkin, etc., to see that their intent was to “free” the woman from the “prison” of the family. How else to do that but demonize men and children? And guess what - they did a really great job!
How many women actually fear walking past a group of men on the street?
You do realize that we have feminism to THANK for this? Prior to the sexual revolution, men would not have dared to treat women as they do today. But feminists were not happy with the idea of men doing things for them or treating them as though they were “pure and untouchable”. They wanted to get down in the dirt WITH the men. Another success, wouldn’t you say?
Just saying it was better before feminism, is an ignorant assessment of the real nature of the times and the prevalent classism at the turn of the century.
Do you mean like when you said this:
**
Before feminism, things were awful,
women just repressed their anger.**

How do you presume to speak for all women?

Let’s break this down using the facts.

Prior to the rise of militant feminism:
Divorce:
The American divorce rate today is more than twice that of 1960, but has declined slightly since hitting the highest point in our history in the early 1980s.
Pornography
1960 Playboy
2008 Porn available everywhere, including in the privacy of one’s home at the click of the mouse
Abortion
1960 Illegal
2009 4,000 per day in the US alone
Child Abuse
The rate of infant homicide reached a 30-year high in 2000.
The rate more than doubled from 4.3 homicides per 100,000 children under age one in 1970 to 9.1 per 100,000 children under age one in 2000.
Rape
1960 - 17,190
2006 - 92,455
disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

Women should educate themselves about the real driving force behind the feminist “movement” before so quickly jumping to it’s defense.
disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm
 
Women should educate themselves about the real driving force behind the feminist “movement” before so quickly jumping to it’s defense.
Just as anti-feminists really should educate themselves about the real driving force behind the feminist “movement” from sources other than the more rabid ultra-right, of course.

Anyway, while this may be terribly interesting and we’d undoubtedly have a lots and lots of fun being unpleasant about each other and our respective points of view, it doesn’t get us anywhere at all. So, let me ask what I think are the central questions - what would you suggest as a set of practical ‘solutions’ to all these supposed ills and how would you propose to sell them to a skeptical market?
 
Oh dear.

Well there doesn’t seem to be any good definition of “feminist” these day’s, but I’ll call myself one anyway. The problem is not really in the label, its in what we now call equality. As much as I dislike a lot of what the OP said(sorry hun!!) and I do not think bringing “religion” back into schools is the answer, perhaps bring back ethics and social studies may be a good idea. We get so caught up on respecting different cultural values, that we’ve forgotten that society NEEDS an ethical and civilized society to survive.

Within the younger female community, a feminist has quite literally become a woman who is liberal with her own body. If she believes in EQUALITY, then, she’s allowed to and EXPECTED to behave like a young male. Oh…My …goodness!! How cruel!! As a feminist, I see very little action going on in our community that actually supports women.

I see women who remove teeth from their mouth, so they have higher cheekbones. Women who shave some bone off their feet, so they can fit into fashionable shoes. I see women who put foreign substances into their foreheads, and can no longer smile, so that they can allow themselves to be valued by their youthful looks. In America, last year, over 1000 women, did surgery on their private parts, so they could more resemble porn stars for their partners.

Yep…feminism is…dead.

I’m much more about equality. Let me share a situation I was in at work recently, which did in fact involve a man-hater( I will NOT call her a feminist). The meeting we were in got very passionate. Most of the meeting members were men, with myself and the chair as women. The men got more and more vocal and started arguing and drowned us females out.Here was her eventual very loud response to this.

“Well why don’t you just PULL it out, see who’s is bigger, and then lets move on”. The worst part about it was, they all shut up and giggled.

I…EXPLODED!!

I stood up and slammed my palm on the table loudly. I did it deliberately. I said “How DARE you equate the passion these men have for their jobs, the desire they have to lead their teams well, and their ultimalte goal for this company with SUCH disrespect. How dare you reduce these men and their views to the size of their Penis!!” and I walked out. We have been so conditioned to see men as the bad guys, that we can no longer see them for who they are.

I was SO angry. For so long women have been judged by certain things. We still have a long way to go, before we understand that EQUALITY is respecting difference not trying to creating a unisex human race, nor judging according to our base human anatomy.

Gosh I was so angry.
 
Yes, one of the great steps forward has, indeed, been the increase in reporting of crimes against women.
And the increase in reporting of crimes against children.

Blessedtoo, simply saying that numbers have changed doesn’t mean the numbers changed because of feminism. Society and culture are too complex to be reduced to such a simple explanation.
 
What do you base this broad, sweeping assessment on? We all have personal stories to bring to the table. Yours appears to center on the difficult experiences of your grandmother and mother, both of whom had the difficult challenge of overcoming racism. My ancestral history is quite different from your’s, and not because we were affluent or elitist. If you do your homework, you will see that the early feminist movement was INDEED an elitist movement. It has never been about reaching the average woman. Still isn’t today - despite the pc rhetoric.

The movement did start in upper class because those women were much more educated. But the challenges that they faced were different. These women often didn’t work and they stayed home. After the women’s movement, they had just started to make a bigger presence in the workplace
You may not say it, but ed was correct in his selection of quotes from the “mothers” of the feminist movement. One need only read the early books written by Frieden, Steinman, Robin Morgan, Andrea Dworkin, etc., to see that their intent was to “free” the woman from the “prison” of the family. How else to do that but demonize men and children? And guess what - they did a really great job!

Funny…You never mentioned Sojurner Truth Ida B. Welles, Mary Ann Shadd Cary, Margaretta Forten, Harriet Forten Purvis. Why is that? You seem to percieve that before feminism, that things were much better for all women.
Like I said, The non white experience with feminism is very different from the White majority model. You have to seperate them according to socioeconomic class experience. African American women regarded their families with higher esteem since for over 400 years, the hadn’t the luxery of being in a stable family. Ther husbands were taken from them and their children were often sold. They were not allowed to observe marriage like White women were so they didn’t regard it as the “prison” that white feminist writers had. They just wanted their rights.

You do realize that we have feminism to THANK for this? Prior to the sexual revolution, men would not have dared to treat women as they do today. But feminists were not happy with the idea of men doing things for them or treating them as though they were "pure and untouchable". They wanted to get down in the dirt WITH the men. Another success, wouldn’t you say?

Lol again silly and niave. That Untoucable & pure BS only applied to white women. Black women were considered dirty little hussys and compared to animals. Black women were raped and abused ALL the time but they had no legal recourse against them. No one cared about a black woman’s “virtue” Are you saying that black slave women were fearful of being raped because of feminism? Women have always wanted to have sex with men, To infer otherwise is proposterous.
After all, if men were having sex more than women pre-feminism just WHO were they having sex with? Other men?

How do you presume to speak for all women?

How do you presume to speak for any woman at all? I personally would NOT like things to go back to how they were before because there was nothing for me to go back to, save my Native American heritage which was Matrilineal in nature. I have nothing to benafit from a pre feminist society. I wouldn’t be able to vote, travel the world, Attend most colleges, own my own land, or have any say in politics or the economy. I wouldn’t have been blessed with all the wonderful expereinces that have been denied women over the years. The other poster was correct, we are going backwards in regards to feminism, Girls only care about being attractive to the opposite sex which is always a marker that women becoming dependant on mates to do things that women in the last few decades have done themselves. Women often did this because they felt powerless to do anything else and manipulating men through sex was their only way. That is not a feministic ideal. the feminist ideal is to use your mind and talents to achieve. Sex and the City isn’t the reality of America, In truth more girls aspire to be a stupid whore like Paris than a smart whore like Samantha Jones. It requires no effort, no diligience or intelligence. It seems to me like Eds dream is coming true already. Soon every American girl will be going back to gold digging for a husband.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top