E
edwest2
Guest
Once again, what do any of you think should be done? Solution oriented as opposed to fear oriented?
Peace,
Ed
Peace,
Ed
Somehow, the male of the species needs to become more marketable - rather than most consideration being given to just how very, very naughty the female of the species is to be rejecting designs that were last popular (with advertisers, anyway) over 50 years ago, marketers need to come to terms with the fact that the designs (never very realistic in long-term use) are just past their sell-by date (by decades).Once again, what do any of you think should be done? Solution oriented as opposed to fear oriented?
Just having a little fun w/ your post so you see that anything taken to an exteme is usually unpleasant~and that includes religious fervor, traditional values, intolerance for change and individual differences.There is this company that I know of that was a buisness owned only by men. They seemed to hate women and it would actually effect the working enviornment of the company as well as the abuse of other workers.
I used to work for a few companys earlier back on that had men who were male chauvenist pigs in some higher power positions. And again it made it miserable for some of the workers. So it brings up the question. If chauvenism is so good in these peoples eyes and so “liberating” why are they themselves so miserable and rude to other people? Because it seems every chauvenist I have met or heard of has been mean and rude to the bone to people. They seem like extremely unhappy miserable people and have a hatred for people who are religious it seems.
Now if chauvenism is such a wonderful movement in the eyes of these men, why are they themselves so miserable and angry towards society? On the job I know some chauvenists who have made it miserable for certains workers simply because they were a woman In fact in general, for myself, it seems nearly everyone I and my friends have had problems with in the workplace from companys in the past were people who were secular and not even religious, let alone Catholic. It seems their immoral ways in their life does effect other people in life who are good hard working God fearing people. And that is a sad thing.
I think its a why we need to bring God back in schools. Because this is what secular society spits out. Cold, hard, uncaring, secular people who would stab their mothers in the back if they were offered enough. This “secular” mindset creates problems later in life for people who are honest and good and unfortunatly have to deal with such people in life.
On the contrary, the “war” fought by NOW has enabled women to largely take their place alongside men as equals in the workplace. Today, female and male employees are largely considered fungible by most employers due to that struggle. Instead of victimhood, their struggle opened the doors to millions of young women who reap the benefits of feminism daily. I would wager less women are victimized today than were in the 1950’s for the simple reason that more women have the skills needed to live on their own and therefore the ability to walk out of a bad marriage. Even having that ability to walk, I would guess, improves her lot in life because her partner can’t simply take it for granted that she will put up with anything.Oh, I got it alright. Instead of solving any of the problems between men and women, NOW declared war. “Sisters! Throw off the chains of your oppresion!” Eternal victimhood is all they offered women. Fear and mistrust. Healing the wounds was out of the question.
This is wrong. This is unBiblical.
God bless,
Ed
I’m sure that’s all terribly interesting and all that but the problem is that you’ve got to sell it to a skeptical market - sitting in a corner of the internet moaning ‘Ain’t it awful’ isn’t going to do it for you, would be my guess.Then why get married in the first place? Should lawyers be on hand in case a woman wants to date a man?
The equality you talk about is not a truly functional equality but a description of a power struggle involving money. This is unBiblical.
The correct, Biblical approach involves trust, understanding, commitment and true love, not the Sex and the City variety that turns women into predatory fornicators, like the men they were not supposed to imitate.
Love involves commitment and is not always easy, especially when imperfect human beings are involved. Too much emphasis is placed on sex and almost none on building a real relationship based on compatibility, trust and understanding. This should be the goal of both men and women. This is Biblical. This is what should be promoted.
And isn’t it surprising? They weren’t able to go out and work a full time job and then come home and expect hubby was going to help with the kids and housework. How deprived! Stuck at home with only children to talk to and no second eight to ten hours outside the home.I know many old women who grew up in the early 1900s who said women were alot happier back then and had much better values and respect for others.
But you seemed terribly interested in getting into the ‘solution oriented’ but all I’ve seen is ‘ain’t it awful’. I’m genuinely interested in your thoughts as to practical steps of getting wherever you think we ought to be going - together with how you think you’re going to sell it to a highly skeptical audience.“sell”? This isn’t Marketing 101 and my comments were meant to be taken to heart by anyone here who might be interested.
I honestly don’t know what the complaints are all about anyway. Women came up with their own solution. To change themselves, get educated and participate in the politics and economics. The sex thing is really irrelavent. Ater all, prostitution was the only other option that women had other than marriage. Men fornicate, women fornicate. This perpatration that one sex is morally superior than another at some point in time is silly.In fact, it’s downright oppresive. I’m sure alot of men like to hold women up to these rediculous standards. But Feminism is about the right of a woman to be her own person and use her own mind. Women have come to their own solutions. I think it’s alot of men who are still playing catch up to the dramatic shift. All they need do is adjust a little. The OP described these bussiness women as angry which I think is off. They are probably acting like stern bosses are supposed to act. Secondly, women no longer need men for financial support. So the “aggression” you are referring to may be the fact that they are not sexually receptive to you. It may just be indifference.But you seemed terribly interested in getting into the ‘solution oriented’ but all I’ve seen is ‘ain’t it awful’. I’m genuinely interested in your thoughts as to practical steps of getting wherever you think we ought to be going - together with how you think you’re going to sell it to a highly skeptical audience.
If you can’t sell it, how on earth do you expect anybody to buy it?
Could it really be that all you have to offer is ‘ain’t it awful’?
Ed, I am curious but perplexed. Could you spell out this solution?Sad. I’ve given the solution but people are reading past it like I didn’t write it. It’s in the Bible.
I think this is everyone’s goal, and a lot of folks find such love. Why do you think feminism prevents it?The answer, once again, is real love between men and women. Real caring, real understanding and real respect.
So, let’s see if I’m getting you straight here, what you’re telling us is that you’re going with a cliché-driven model?Sad. I’ve given the solution but people are reading past it like I didn’t write it. It’s in the Bible. It’s not about sex or politics. It’s about true love - real love. Not Sex and the City.
You can have your power fantasies that revolve around the idea that the only time women will be “equal” to men is when they become men. Power and money are not the answer.
The answer, once again, is real love between men and women. Real caring, real understanding and real respect. It’s in the Bible.
God bless,
Ed
What do you base this broad, sweeping assessment on? We all have personal stories to bring to the table. Yours appears to center on the difficult experiences of your grandmother and mother, both of whom had the difficult challenge of overcoming racism. My ancestral history is quite different from your’s, and not because we were affluent or elitist. If you do your homework, you will see that the early feminist movement was INDEED an elitist movement. It has never been about reaching the average woman. Still isn’t today - despite the pc rhetoric.They were never really appreciated to begin with.** Before feminism, things were awful,** women just repressed their anger.I wouldn’t say after feminism because things are still being worked on. It’s an ongoing process. Perhaps, one day America will stop penalizing women for bringing life into the world because feminism is exalting and appreciation of womens’ qualities, not putting them down.
You may not say it, but ed was correct in his selection of quotes from the “mothers” of the feminist movement. One need only read the early books written by Frieden, Steinman, Robin Morgan, Andrea Dworkin, etc., to see that their intent was to “free” the woman from the “prison” of the family. How else to do that but demonize men and children? And guess what - they did a really great job!I wouldn’t say that men are the enemy but chauvanism is.
You do realize that we have feminism to THANK for this? Prior to the sexual revolution, men would not have dared to treat women as they do today. But feminists were not happy with the idea of men doing things for them or treating them as though they were “pure and untouchable”. They wanted to get down in the dirt WITH the men. Another success, wouldn’t you say?How many women actually fear walking past a group of men on the street?
Do you mean like when you said this:Just saying it was better before feminism, is an ignorant assessment of the real nature of the times and the prevalent classism at the turn of the century.
women just repressed their anger.**Before feminism, things were awful,
Yes, one of the great steps forward has, indeed, been the increase in reporting of crimes against women.Let’s break this down using the facts.
Just as anti-feminists really should educate themselves about the real driving force behind the feminist “movement” from sources other than the more rabid ultra-right, of course.Women should educate themselves about the real driving force behind the feminist “movement” before so quickly jumping to it’s defense.
And the increase in reporting of crimes against children.Yes, one of the great steps forward has, indeed, been the increase in reporting of crimes against women.
What do you base this broad, sweeping assessment on? We all have personal stories to bring to the table. Yours appears to center on the difficult experiences of your grandmother and mother, both of whom had the difficult challenge of overcoming racism. My ancestral history is quite different from your’s, and not because we were affluent or elitist. If you do your homework, you will see that the early feminist movement was INDEED an elitist movement. It has never been about reaching the average woman. Still isn’t today - despite the pc rhetoric.
The movement did start in upper class because those women were much more educated. But the challenges that they faced were different. These women often didn’t work and they stayed home. After the women’s movement, they had just started to make a bigger presence in the workplace
You may not say it, but ed was correct in his selection of quotes from the “mothers” of the feminist movement. One need only read the early books written by Frieden, Steinman, Robin Morgan, Andrea Dworkin, etc., to see that their intent was to “free” the woman from the “prison” of the family. How else to do that but demonize men and children? And guess what - they did a really great job!
Funny…You never mentioned Sojurner Truth Ida B. Welles, Mary Ann Shadd Cary, Margaretta Forten, Harriet Forten Purvis. Why is that? You seem to percieve that before feminism, that things were much better for all women.
Like I said, The non white experience with feminism is very different from the White majority model. You have to seperate them according to socioeconomic class experience. African American women regarded their families with higher esteem since for over 400 years, the hadn’t the luxery of being in a stable family. Ther husbands were taken from them and their children were often sold. They were not allowed to observe marriage like White women were so they didn’t regard it as the “prison” that white feminist writers had. They just wanted their rights.
You do realize that we have feminism to THANK for this? Prior to the sexual revolution, men would not have dared to treat women as they do today. But feminists were not happy with the idea of men doing things for them or treating them as though they were "pure and untouchable". They wanted to get down in the dirt WITH the men. Another success, wouldn’t you say?
Lol again silly and niave. That Untoucable & pure BS only applied to white women. Black women were considered dirty little hussys and compared to animals. Black women were raped and abused ALL the time but they had no legal recourse against them. No one cared about a black woman’s “virtue” Are you saying that black slave women were fearful of being raped because of feminism? Women have always wanted to have sex with men, To infer otherwise is proposterous.
After all, if men were having sex more than women pre-feminism just WHO were they having sex with? Other men?
How do you presume to speak for all women?
How do you presume to speak for any woman at all? I personally would NOT like things to go back to how they were before because there was nothing for me to go back to, save my Native American heritage which was Matrilineal in nature. I have nothing to benafit from a pre feminist society. I wouldn’t be able to vote, travel the world, Attend most colleges, own my own land, or have any say in politics or the economy. I wouldn’t have been blessed with all the wonderful expereinces that have been denied women over the years. The other poster was correct, we are going backwards in regards to feminism, Girls only care about being attractive to the opposite sex which is always a marker that women becoming dependant on mates to do things that women in the last few decades have done themselves. Women often did this because they felt powerless to do anything else and manipulating men through sex was their only way. That is not a feministic ideal. the feminist ideal is to use your mind and talents to achieve. Sex and the City isn’t the reality of America, In truth more girls aspire to be a stupid whore like Paris than a smart whore like Samantha Jones. It requires no effort, no diligience or intelligence. It seems to me like Eds dream is coming true already. Soon every American girl will be going back to gold digging for a husband.