First Amendment: Freedom of Religion

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim1130
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jim1130

Guest
FIRST AMENDAMENT (ratified 12/15/1791): Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Although not a scientific survery or meant to reflect Catholic opinion 100 %, I was dismayed when I recently read comments in response to an online CNN article about the upcoming Presidential election and abortion. A substantial majority of respondents who claimed to be Catholic wrote that the Bishops had no right to tell them how to vote (Bishops were not telling people how to vote; only that abortion is one of the five non-negotiable issues of the Catholic Church). Even the Archbishop here in Oklahoma City area has been very careful to educate on core values and beliefs, not whom one should vote for. The majority of the responses to the online CNN article from the self-proclaimed Catholics were downright hostile to the messages of the Bishops, speaking of how behind-the-times the Catholic Church is and claiming 98 % of Catholics use birth control (and, yes, the priest sex abuse scandal). I submitted a lengthy response of my own about Church Authority, that it was American Catholics clamoring for change in the Church rather than the Catholics of Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, Central and South America, Canada, etc. in an attempt of showing American arrogance, and the five non-negotiables as well as the fact that this issue at stake is truly about religious freedom, which seems to have been lost in the dialogue because “abortion” and “contraception” are better trigger words.

The Catholic Church is in the forefront of this battle, and often alone. Yes, Hobby Lobby is filing a suit, but it is a Christian business, not a religious institution so I do not believe they will have much of a defense. I truly believe that the Obama Administration feels that if it can dismantle the most vocal opposition, the Catholic Church due to its authority and uniformity, then the other churches, because of their independence and absence of cohesiveness, will be unable to unify and unite an opposition. Better to attack and defeat the main obstacle first and then stamp out the tiny pockets of resistance later.

What can be done to educate Catholics and others that the threat from the Department of Health and Human Services and the Obama Administration is religious freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment?

What information is available to share with others? Granted the US Conference on Catholic Bishops will have materials available to educate people, but many Catholics and non-Catholics will refuse to acknowledge these materials because the materials are Catholic in origin. In esence, they will be contrarians simply because the Catholic Church vocalizes a specific position.
 
In total and frank honesty I don’t think there is much of anything that can be done that will make much difference. Especially in the time left before the election.
Far too many people are trapped in the short cycle, “pocket book first”, mentality. Economic issues seem to be about the only ones that tend to make a difference to people in how they vote and these are certainly the ones that both parties emphasize in their mass media ads.
It is written that man cannot serve two masters…God and mammon. There can be little doubt which one the majority of people, including many Catholics, have chosen to serve.

That said, and as a practical matter, while it is of great import that Obama be defeated if possible, it will make little difference in matters of legislation etc.
The only place that these things can be affected is through the slow, careful persistent and consistent teaching and conversion of people, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, to the pro-life outlook.
So - Gird you loins, prepare for battle, not in violence but in love.
The Church is entering a new phase in the world. A phase where her political influence is less, but her spiritual influence can grow ever more fully and perfected.
May God give us strength.

Peace
James
 
I have two related questions that I’ve been pondering since the HHS mandate issue began, and I haven’t really gotten any straight answers. Maybe you folks can give me some insight:
  1. For the people in favor of the mandate, is there a limit to what power the government has over its citizens? If so, what is that dividing line?
  2. For the people who believe that the 1st amendment supercedes the HHS mandate, are there any employment laws that can not be superceded by freedom of religion? If so, what is that dividing line?
 
What on earth has the First Amendment have to do with Catholics voting for the candidate of their choice? If you are concerned that a substantial number of Catholics may vote for a candidate who does not reflect your church’s teaching then that is something that you need to sort out internally, within the church.

For example, the fact that over half of self-described Catholics have no problem with gay marriage is not a problem with the Constitution. The very fact that you have religious freedom means that you are free to try to convince those Catholics that they are wrong.

Good luck with that…
 
Hmmmmmmm … guess that is why we have Catholic Answers Forum😉
 
Hmmmmmmm … guess that is why we have Catholic Answers Forum😉
And it’s a great forum for that very purpose. But if someone posts remarks that complain about the First Ammendment as being the problem with how Catholics vote, then they are barking up the wrong tree.
 
What on earth has the First Amendment have to do with Catholics voting for the candidate of their choice? If you are concerned that a substantial number of Catholics may vote for a candidate who does not reflect your church’s teaching then that is something that you need to sort out internally, within the church.

For example, the fact that over half of self-described Catholics have no problem with gay marriage is not a problem with the Constitution. The very fact that you have religious freedom means that you are free to try to convince those Catholics that they are wrong.

Good luck with that…
You are quite correct. We DO have to address these matters within our own faith community.
And it’s a great forum for that very purpose. But if someone posts remarks that complain about the First Amendment as being the problem with how Catholics vote, then they are barking up the wrong tree.
👍👍

Peace
James
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top