B
Brendan
Guest
Br. Rich SFO:
In the first case, you would claim that the priest broke the seal of the confessional.
In the second, it would seem that the priest denied the Sacrament to one who sought to confess his sins (on his deathbed even)
In either case, should the Bishop be upset with that priest?I would have to see the actual transcript. For example changing a few letters changes the whole statement.
“The priest who attended the execution of Timothy McVeigh stated that Timothy sought to have a Sacramental Confession, confessed his sins and recieved a Sacramental Absolution.”
and
The priest who attended the execution of Timothy McVeigh stated that Timothy sought to have a Sacramental Confession, to confess his sins and recieve a Sacramental Absolution.
The second version does not actually say if he did.
What did his Bishop say after he said this?
In the first case, you would claim that the priest broke the seal of the confessional.
In the second, it would seem that the priest denied the Sacrament to one who sought to confess his sins (on his deathbed even)