For Eastern Orthodox Christians

  • Thread starter Thread starter followingtheway
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just to be clear, I was trying to defend you without derailing the thread.
Your response to 1Tim215Mommy’s ignorance was a thumbs up and to write “I’m aware of the history”, as though anything she had presented in any way passes for history. So please forgive me for remaining resolute that nothing in this thread indicates that anyone knows anything about the Armenian objections to Chalcedon. But still, thank you for attempting to correct 1Tim215Mommy on her inaccurate and polemical use of language regarding the OO.
 
Your response to 1Tim215Mommy’s ignorance was a thumbs up and to write “I’m aware of the history”, as though anything she had presented in any way passes for history. So please forgive me for remaining resolute that nothing in this thread indicates that anyone knows anything about the Armenian objections to Chalcedon. But still, thank you for attempting to correct 1Tim215Mommy on her inaccurate and polemical use of language regarding the OO.
The thumbs up was a way of acknowledging that she did not accuse the modern Armenians of Monophysitism, and trying to end an argument before it began. As I said, I didn’t want to derail the thread; I just wanted to make sure nobody mistook the OO for Monophysites. I probably could’ve done it in a better way than a thumbs up though, so I apologize for the misunderstanding.
 
I hope that was an isolated incident but I was at an impressive age and the rejection was with me perhaps for a very long time. I have never set foot in the Orthodox churches ever since. I really don’t know what to expect there; all I know that if I was not an Orthodox, then their church was not for me.

What really hurt was the manner in how the priest chased us out from the church. It was said and done in disgust as if we were intruding. It really dampened our spirit to say the least. We were out of town for a conference that time. In between sessions we decided to look at the city and saw a decent church. We went inside, three of us, silently and prayed. In the midst of our prayer, the priest interjected and that was how it came about. We were practically shaken and one of my friends was closed to tears.

Yes, that was the background from where we came. Anyone can just go inside a church to pray if the church is not closed. Nobody would ask for your religious affiliation. You could just pray. Usually the priests are not around if it is not during a mass but if he is, he can be approached. He does not have to talk to you. Goodness, a church is a house of worship, why anyone would want to stop you from worshiping the Lord.

I do travel a lot internationally and I would always make it a point to seek a church (Catholic) in the city. Often times if I see a priest around I would come up to him to chat and perhaps to take pictures.
I don’t know if you’re talking about your incident or mine, so please forgive me on that. :o I wouldn’t expect you to feel any different, and no one else should, either. I haven’t been to an Orthodox church in a while, and I continue to pray I won’t have to, even though my parents plan on my family and I finding a parish to attend. I would have done the same thing. If the Church looks nice, and it’s open, or even if it’s just unlocked, then you should have been able to go there without issue. If the door was locked or there was a sign that read “Orthodox Only,” then I could understand, but I’m pretty sure no Orthodox church would post that. I would never hinder anyone from converting to another faith if that’s where they feel God wants them, but if I was Catholic and had that experience, I wouldn’t even let that thought cross my mind.

It sounds like he literally did chase you out, like you were some kid shoplifting from a Dollar Store, and that is not right or fair to anyone, Orthodox or not. Also, whether or not you were silent should have had nothing to do with it. Even if you were in there and started talking he shouldn’t have said anything. It is truly saddens me how a Priest, who is supposed to be a man of God, could do such a cruel thing to a few people who just wanted to pray for a little while while they (you) were on business.

Exactly! And that is how it should be for all Churches. My Priest at the CC I attended over the summer wasn’t really there too much, as he was constantly driving back and forth, 2 hours each way, moving his belongings as he was being transferred 2 hours away, yet he always made the extra effort to welcome me, to help me with questions about converting, and told me about the different Masses they were having each week, like E.A. No Priest, Pastor, Minister, or religious figure should ever stop you from praying. Just because you aren’t in a parish/church that is a part of your religious affiliation doesn’t mean you don’t have the right to pray to our Lord.

I honestly think that is a wonderful thing to do! The Priests you have met were probably a bit surprised that you talked to them, seeing as most people I know wouldn’t take that extra step.
 
I am sorry that happened to you, Reuben. No priest should act in such a way, and we should pray for all of our priests.

He was Ukrainian? Perhaps the fact that you said you were Catholic might have triggered his outburst. The history between the Ukrainian Orthodox and the Latin Church is, er…complicated and very very messy. Maybe this priest was recalling experiences and the like…it doesn’t excuse bad behavior, but it can certainly put it in context.

We all are sinners, and need God’s mercy…the bad behavior of a few monks or bishops is pretty irrelevant to the big picture, which is Theosis.
 
So if I stopped by an Orthodox church on a Saturday afternoon…just to look around quietly and respectfully…what would happen?

If I went to the Divine Liturgy on a Sunday morning and sat in the back row following along as best I could…not receiving the sacrament, of course…what would happen?
 
So if I stopped by an Orthodox church on a Saturday afternoon…just to look around quietly and respectfully…what would happen?

If I went to the Divine Liturgy on a Sunday morning and sat in the back row following along as best I could…not receiving the sacrament, of course…what would happen?
That, my friend, is something I am unsure of. Every parish is different, just like every Priest is different. People will probably ask who you are, if your Orthodox, things like that. Note: From all of the Orthodox parishes I’ve been to, they normally aren’t open on Saturdays, except for Holy Days and/or Church events, so if you are wanting to visit, plan on going on a Sunday. As for your questions, as I said before, I do not know, but do prepare yourself in case something goes wrong.
 
So if I stopped by an Orthodox church on a Saturday afternoon…just to look around quietly and respectfully…what would happen?
Depends. If it’s during Vespers and you came in nobody would probably notice. At my parish they’d come up afterwards to say hello. If you went to St. George’s down the street you’d be locked out with nobody because they don’t do Vespers, or we might be standoffish because Youth Group might be going on, and we’d be concerned about a strange man we don’t know wandering around the grounds while our kids are there without their parents (I’m one of the youth leaders, that’s the ‘we’ I mean) and that parish is in a sketchy neighborhood.

Depending on the time of day the temple might be locked - I don’t know of any church that has open doors all the time nowadays. You might be alone. You might be able to find the priest to get a tour. He might rush you because he has to prepare for Vespers. He might be friendly and invite you to stick around for the service, or might be rushing out the door to go visit a sick parishioner. You might get a priest who doesn’t speak English very well or one who used to be of your denomination.

Your question is sort of like asking “If I go to an American’s house, what should I expect?” It’s too general. What would happen if I went to a Roman Catholic parish, or Baptist parish, or Lutheran parish?
If I went to the Divine Liturgy on a Sunday morning and sat in the back row following along as best I could…not receiving the sacrament, of course…what would happen?
You’d be in Liturgy following along as best you could. You might be welcomed personally afterwards to Coffee Hour, but I know just as many hospitable people who don’t do that because they feel Liturgy alone can be overwhelming without putting someone in the awkward position of rejecting Coffee Hour right afterwards. They only welcome people the second time. You might meet the priest afterwards, you might be ignored, you might have people ask if you’re Orthodox, or if you’re (insert ethnicity here) or if you’re converting. You might have someone help you work out your place in the Service Book, you might just be standing there amidst people who don’t speak English and don’t know where on Earth the Liturgy is in the Service Book. You might be struggling with a book in Cyrillic and a Liturgy in Slavonic. You’d probably be confused by lack of cohesive gestures - when to cross oneself, when to bow, when one can sit or stand, is different in each parish and even amongst parishioners. Generally you’ll be standing the whole time. There might not be any back ‘row’ for you to inhabit!

Again, each parish isn’t an exact replica. Your question is too broad. At my parish (which does have pews) you’d have placed yourself in the middle of elderly widows who only speak Russian. They’d probably ignore you during the service. Afterwards you might be standing around awkwardly, because most of the people who are going to greet you are busy with the Thanksgiving Prayers. If you linger in the temple for that long or find your way into the hall for Coffee Hour you’d be approached, probably by Joseph, David, Jennifer, Elizabeth, Jason, Natalie, Chris, Deacon John, Lisa or any of a number other people. We’d invite you to sit with us and take you with us through the line to get food. Last week it was rice, ground beef, salad, garlic bread and something else. We’d invite you to sit with us next week to help you through the book, and explain what the koliva someone had handed you was and why you were being offered brandy. We’d take you to raid the dessert table.

Lather, rinse, repeat.
 
Depends. If it’s during Vespers and you came in nobody would probably notice. At my parish they’d come up afterwards to say hello. If you went to St. George’s down the street you’d be locked out with nobody because they don’t do Vespers, or we might be standoffish because Youth Group might be going on, and we’d be concerned about a strange man we don’t know wandering around the grounds while our kids are there without their parents (I’m one of the youth leaders, that’s the ‘we’ I mean) and that parish is in a sketchy neighborhood.

Depending on the time of day the temple might be locked - I don’t know of any church that has open doors all the time nowadays. You might be alone. You might be able to find the priest to get a tour. He might rush you because he has to prepare for Vespers. He might be friendly and invite you to stick around for the service, or might be rushing out the door to go visit a sick parishioner. You might get a priest who doesn’t speak English very well or one who used to be of your denomination.

Your question is sort of like asking “If I go to an American’s house, what should I expect?” It’s too general. What would happen if I went to a Roman Catholic parish, or Baptist parish, or Lutheran parish?

You’d be in Liturgy following along as best you could. You might be welcomed personally afterwards to Coffee Hour, but I know just as many hospitable people who don’t do that because they feel Liturgy alone can be overwhelming without putting someone in the awkward position of rejecting Coffee Hour right afterwards. They only welcome people the second time. You might meet the priest afterwards, you might be ignored, you might have people ask if you’re Orthodox, or if you’re (insert ethnicity here) or if you’re converting. You might have someone help you work out your place in the Service Book, you might just be standing there amidst people who don’t speak English and don’t know where on Earth the Liturgy is in the Service Book. You might be struggling with a book in Cyrillic and a Liturgy in Slavonic. You’d probably be confused by lack of cohesive gestures - when to cross oneself, when to bow, when one can sit or stand, is different in each parish and even amongst parishioners. Generally you’ll be standing the whole time. There might not be any back ‘row’ for you to inhabit!

Again, each parish isn’t an exact replica. Your question is too broad. At my parish (which does have pews) you’d have placed yourself in the middle of elderly widows who only speak Russian. They’d probably ignore you during the service. Afterwards you might be standing around awkwardly, because most of the people who are going to greet you are busy with the Thanksgiving Prayers. If you linger in the temple for that long or find your way into the hall for Coffee Hour you’d be approached, probably by Joseph, David, Jennifer, Elizabeth, Jason, Natalie, Chris, Deacon John, Lisa or any of a number other people. We’d invite you to sit with us and take you with us through the line to get food. Last week it was rice, ground beef, salad, garlic bread and something else. We’d invite you to sit with us next week to help you through the book, and explain what the koliva someone had handed you was and why you were being offered brandy. We’d take you to raid the dessert table.

Lather, rinse, repeat.
Hilarious. Thanks!
 
Hello, for Eastern Orthodox Christians and everyone who has knowledge of them, I have a question.
This question might strike as offensive or generalizing, so I apologize in advance…

Well, for those who don’t know me, I have an interest in Religions, not just mine but others. And I often get invited to or just like to visit different Non-Catholic places of worship just to see what it’s like.

I’ve noticed with Catholics, they’re very explanatory and welcoming.
Protestants and Jehovah’s Witnesses even more so (for kind of obvious reasons 🤷).

But I’ve visited one going on two Eastern Orthodox Churches. And I’ve been getting a vibe of skepticism from some of the people in those Churches. Sort of like a “what exactly are you doing here?” kind of vibe.

It all depends on the parish. I guarantee you that if you visited my parish you would be welcome. I know of many Eastern Orthodox Churches that welcome visitors. However, I must be honest, some parishes are so tied to their ethnicism that they do not welcome visitors. However, these parishes are becoming fewer and most Orthodox parishes welcome visitors.

Archpriest John W. Morris

Can anyone tell me why this is?
 
It very much can depend on the Church.

When I was still investigating Orthodoxy I went to a Divine Liturgy at the local Greek Church and very much had that feeling, while at the two OCA parishes I have been a member of I had no such feeling.

I will say that a subsequent visit, well after I had joined the OCA, to the Greek parish did not elicit such feelings. It is quite likely that some of that “What are you doing here?” feeling is the result of ones own insecurities being in a completely different environment. The first OCA church I went to had a more homely feel, and felt particularly inviting, and by the time I went to the second (much larger parish) I was already comfortable in the Orthodox Church.

That isn’t to say there aren’t uninviting Churches. The local Antiochian Church here looks so uninviting I would never go without a direct invitation from someone, and I was told (by a parishioner) that the Antiochian Church in the city I used to live in was also particularly uninviting to outsiders.
That is very unusual in an Antiochian Orthodox Church. Most Antiochian Orthodox Churches encourage visitors and are filled with non-Arab converts. Most of the clergy of the Antiochian Archdiocese are converts. We have received whole parishes of converts from Protestantism.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
And yet, when I referenced Fr. Harrison’s article “Why I Did Not Convert to Eastern Orthodoxy” which mentions the ethnic considerations, the objection was downplayed in another thread.

Seems to me that the fact that most of the world is not Greek or Russian or whatever sort of limits the Orthodox in their ability to “make disciples of all nations”, doesn’t it?

And the fact that they have never gotten out of this mindset suggests that they are a bit like the members of the circumcision group in the book of Acts who weren’t too pleased to hear that the Gentiles were accepting Christ.
At least the Antiochian Orthodox have gotten out of the ethnic mindset except in a few places. Most of our Priests are converts like myself. We have received whole parishes of converts into our Archdiocese. Actually, the Orthodox Church is very active in the mission field. There are hundreds of thousands of Orthodox in Africa, and Latin America. The Greek Orthodox Metropolitan in Mexico just took in over 500,000 Mayan Native Americans in Guatemala and southern Mexico. The Antiochian Patriarchate has about 20 parishes in Great Britain, all but one came into Orthodoxy from Anglicanism. We are also growing in Asia.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
I read about a lot of ‘fights’ within Orthodoxy, here is one within a holy place, Mount Athos. This stunned me as well, greece.greekreporter.com/2013/07/18/mount-athos-monks-wont-move-out-for-eu/

I find what Catholics say about our eastern brothers to be more in line with what Christ wants us to say, brother. I do not find that same kindness from the Orthodox.
There is a reason why the monks of The Esphigmenou Monastery were evicted. They went into schism and broke with the Orthodox Church. Mt. Athos is under the authority of the Ecumenical Patriarch and they accused him of heresy because of our dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church. They are somewhat like the followers of Archbishop Lefebvre are to the Roman Catholic Church.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
Right, they did change their stance from Monophysite (Only One Nature) to Miaphysite (One Nature), BUT they still deny the Truth about Christ ~ He has Two Natures.

I suppose on the positive side, since they’ve changed their beliefs already, perhaps they’ll change it again to Orthodoxy? There is always HOPE, no?🙂
There has been a series of dialogues between Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox theologians which decided that we both believe the same things about Christ, but use different terminology to describe our doctrine. Thus the Christological disputes between Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox has been resolved.
The problem now is differing interpretations of church history. That Eastern Orthodox consider people like Dioscoros and Severus of Antioch heretics, as does the Roman Catholic Church while the Oriental Orthodox consider them Saints. Like the Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox recognize the Council of Chalcedon, while Oriental Orthodox do not. Oriental Orthodox consider the Tome of Pope Leo that was approved at Chalcedon Nestorian. While, Eastern Orthodox consider the Tome of Pope Leo completely Orthodox. Thus further dialogue is necessary to resolve our disagreements about history. However, we are working on resolving these issues. There is very close cooperation between the Syriac Orthodox Church and the Eastern Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch. The new Eastern Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch has declared that he is dedicated to ending the schism between Oriental and Eastern Orthodox.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
You should be rather circumspect about making such a general statement about the Orthodox, particularly on the basis of dialogue between you and other laypersons. There is not one single, definitive Orthodox position about their relationship to the Catholic Church. Some Orthodox do not hold Catholics in high regard at all, some do.

In any case, the attitudes, speech, and actions of individual Orthodox (or of groups of them) have nothing whatsoever to do with our obligations to deal with them charitably, and to avoid giving offense unnecessarily. I would add that relatively recently, the passage you quoted from the CCC about our relationship to the Orthodox was not what was emphasized by the Catholic Church in her dealings with the Orthodox; rather, what was historically emphasized was terms such as “schismatics” and “heretics.” Indeed, there are many Catholics who persist in the use of such rhetoric, in spite of the fact that our bishops are not leading us in that direction, and have not for several decades now. So there’s little wonder why some Orthodox approach us as using similar rhetoric. I’m not saying that I like it or that when I was Orthodox I approved of it, but again, given the unfortunate history, as well as the ongoing use by some Catholics of such rhetoric, it’s not at all surprising.
I am compelled to point out that there is a very active and fruitful dialogue both in North America and on the international level between Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism. The Ecumenical Patriarch attended the installation of Pope Francis, the first time in history even before the schism that a Patriarch of Constantinople has attended a papal installation. The new Eastern Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch, John X, visited Rome a few weeks ago and met with Pope Francis. So both sides are working for reunion.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
I consider our faiths to be different—let’s leave it at that. There is no need to swing around such harsh words as schismatic and heretic, especially when using them is in violation of forum rules.

The Holy Spirit has poured Its grace abundantly upon us. This is how Geronda Ephraim managed to open 17 monasteries in America alone since 1995, starting from nothing but six monks in the desert of Arizona. The working of the Holy Spirit is how the Church in Russia has tripled its number of parishes and increased its number of monasteries nearly eightfold in just twenty years.

We have had no need to call any, because the major heresies of the second millennium were adequately refuted by pan-Orthodox synods.

You mean an event like the one in Brazil, where the Pope was greeted by dancing bishops (this is strictly forbidden by the Canons), and where laymen distributed the Eucharist from plastic cups? No thank you; I think rather that we shall stick to the Catholic tradition of worship which was handed down to us from the Holy Fathers, which does not involve such things. Furthermore, the goal of worship is not to be relevant or to excite the passions (God forbid), but it is to participate in the inestimable privilege of worshiping God, for the increase of faith, and for the quenching of the passions, which is why contemporary music such as that used at WYD would also be unacceptable to us.

By this very criterion, the papacy would then have been false but 1000 years ago when the Pope was not known world over. He is known world over, because he controls a vast organization with an immense amount of wealth, and because of the increased speed of communication we now have in the modern era.

By this criterion, I suppose we should also believe that the Holy Fathers (like St. Basil, St. Gregory the Theologian, etc.) are also irrelevant, because their works are not best sellers. This question, frankly, reflects a consumerist mentality in such a way that I cannot even think of a proper answer to it besides pointing out that consumerism is inimical to the Spirit of Christianity. The spoken word is only one component of our kerygma. We cannot truly convert others without first acquiring illumination in Christ, and having the light of Christ shine forth from us. It is for this reason that St. Seraphim of Sarov is reported once to have said, “acquire a peaceful spirit, and thousands around you will be saved.”

Why have you not made disciples of all nations yet?

No, the Holy Fathers are all quite clear that baptisms performed outside of the Church are not salvific. I am aware that Roman Catholic ecclesiology after Vatican II teaches that heretical and schismatic baptisms are salvific, but we do not accept this, holding to the older patristic model whereby if one in heresy or schism is saved, he is saved in spite of his baptism outside of the Church, and not in virtue of it.
That is not quite true. Most Orthodox do not re-baptize converts. The problem that we have today is with liberal Protestant Churches who baptize “in the name of the creator, redeemer and sanctifier,” instead of the correct “Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” Thus we now have to verify that a convert was baptized using the correct Trinitarian formula. Look at Canon 95 of the Council in Trullo. Even Arians were not re-baptized if they converted to the then united Church. The Council of Constantinople of 1484 ruled that Roman Catholics should be received by Chrismation, but used a prayer to reconcile some who has left the Church, not the prayer to complete a Baptism. The Council of Jerusalem Bethlehem of 1672 ruled that Protestant converts are to be received by Chrismation, but mandated that the prayer used be the one used to complete a Baptism from the Baptism service of the Eastern Orthodox Church.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
My experience was with the Ukrainian Orthodox. We were practically being chased out of the church by their priest when a group of us, young people that time, entering the church to pray. A burly priest approached us, asking, “Who are you? Where do you come from?” We said we are Catholics and just wanted to pray. The next scene was totally unexpected. In a booming voice this huge man said, “Get out! Get out of here!” We were so shocked and as we exited the door, he closed it and we heard a sharp click of the door being locked, probably, from the inside.

I swear I would never go into that church again. And after long years, I still remember it now and prayed that may his soul rest in peace if he had departed and if he is retired, the incident happened a long time already, may the peace of the lord be upon him.
Please do not judge all Orthodox by one ignorant priest. I always welcome visitors to our Church as do my people.
I once served a parish that had three Catholic parishes, one was the German parish, another was the Irish parish and the third was the Italian parish, so you have had the same problem that we have. The difference is that the Catholics have been here longer and are more Americanized. However, we also have parishes that are Americanized. My parish is and welcomes visitors. Most of the clergy in the Antiochian Archdiocese are converts to Orthodoxy. I have seen two Patriarchs of Antioch serve the Liturgy almost entirely in English, Elias IV, and Ignatius IV. I am sure that our new Patriarch John X speaks English since he had jurisdiction over England, where all but one of our over 20 parishes are made up entirely of converts from the Church of England. Antiochian Orthodoxy has grown so much in England, that just a few weeks ago the Holy Synod of Antioch turned the British Deanery into an Archdiocese and will be electing and consecrating a Metropolitan to send to London.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
OverLapping Bishops In America…Oh You Mean Exactly Like The Multitude OfOverLapping Catholic Bishop Jurisdictions In America - Coptic,Roman, Melkite, Maronite, Ruthenian,Syro-MaloLobar Just To Name Some (Not All) CaTholic Jurisdictions In My metropolitan City Alone.
We are working on Eastern Orthodox unity in North America. We have established the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in North and Central America which includes all canonical Orthodox Bishops. The Assembly has established several committees to work to unify Orthodox practice in preparation for greater unity.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
When on the fence considering eastern Orthodox or going back to the Catholic church lots of things kept popping up that bothered me about Orthodoxy. One thing I found especially disturbing was a fight amongst monks at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem, these were Orthodox monks. I do not understand that rivalry between ‘jurisdictions’…is there another side to this story?

religionnewsblog.com/22913/church-of-the-holy-sepulcher
The situation in the Church of the Resurrection (Holy Sepulcher) and the Church of the Nativity is a scandal that should concern all Orthodox and Catholic Christians. All sides act in a very un-Christian manner. I have had friends who were treated very rudely by Franciscans in these Churches.

Archpriest John W. Morris
 
That is not quite true. Most Orthodox do not re-baptize converts. The problem that we have today is with liberal Protestant Churches who baptize “in the name of the creator, redeemer and sanctifier,” instead of the correct “Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” Thus we now have to verify that a convert was baptized using the correct Trinitarian formula. Look at Canon 95 of the Council in Trullo. Even Arians were not re-baptized if they converted to the then united Church. The Council of Constantinople of 1484 ruled that Roman Catholics should be received by Chrismation, but used a prayer to reconcile some who has left the Church, not the prayer to complete a Baptism. The Council of Jerusalem Bethlehem of 1672 ruled that Protestant converts are to be received by Chrismation, but mandated that the prayer used be the one used to complete a Baptism from the Baptism service of the Eastern Orthodox Church.

Archpriest John W. Morris
Fr. bless,

None of those canons or proclamations teach that the baptisms of those outside of the Church are salvific, which was my original point of contention (and frankly I would also argue that they never teach that those outside of the Church perform the same baptism that the Church does). Not even St. Augustine, who recognized validity of the sacraments performed by those outside of the Church believed that their sacraments were salvific (because they could not, in his understanding, confer sanctifying grace), and indeed, the Eastern Fathers accordingly referred to baptisms performed outside of the Church as pollutions, and St. Basil the Great rejects the baptisms of heretics outright for the reason that they are completely cut off from the Church, with the exception of cases where another rule has been passed down for the sake of economy (this can clearly seen in canons 1, 20, and 47 of Basil, which were approved by the Council of Trullo). It would be no exaggeration, I think, to say that the Catholic doctrine of the Fathers is that baptisms performed by those outside of the Church are in some sense defective (be it lacking the grace of the Holy Spirit, in the thought of Ss. Firmilian, Cyprian, and Basil, or lacking sanctifying grace in the thought of St. Augustine), but that they have some some sacramental characteristic to them (when performed with proper form), which is why we can receive by economy those baptized outside of the Church.
 
There is a reason why the monks of The Esphigmenou Monastery were evicted. They went into schism and broke with the Orthodox Church. Mt. Athos is under the authority of the Ecumenical Patriarch and they accused him of heresy because of our dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church. They are somewhat like the followers of Archbishop Lefebvre are to the Roman Catholic Church.

Archpriest John W. Morris
The Esphigmenou monks were sent eviction notices but last time I heard they have not actually left their monastery, although this particular case in point deals not with their monastery building but with their building in Karyes. They do not view the Ecumenical Patriarch as heretical for his dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church, rather they have viewed the past Ecumenical Patriarchs as heretical for the Patriarchs’ involvement with a heresy known as Ecumenism. While the majority of those on Mt. Athos are in communion with the Ecumenical Patriarch, Esphigmenou monastery is the only monastery that isn’t along with various sketes who aren’t as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top