For Protestants who don't honor Mary ...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter_J
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am sure you do. It is another chance for Catholics to look down their noses at those comical rustic Protestants in all their contradictions. Aren’t we funny? Let’s all gather around and mock the idiot Protestants. That is what it is all about, isn’t it?

This is what is called a gotcha game, where you find a contradiction with which to humiliate and corner the other side in an attempt to bring them down. What fun.

Well. We don’t sing about Mary. After this week I recognize the Reformers’ wisdom in excising every possible trace of Mariolatry from our services. I thank God for that. Singing songs to Mary in the service, it seems to me, would be uncharitable, like giving gin to an alcoholic. There are repeated admonitions about ‘the Lord God alone you shall serve’. I have seen enough Catholics committed to Mary who are disrespectful to priests to last me a lifetime. If I had a statue of Mary in my garden right now I would smash it after the disgusting spectacle of this week. The threads are gone but the memories remain. The Catholic Church indulges idolatry by singing such songs. That has been made extremely clear.

We do not sing birthday songs, patriotic songs, or anything to anyone except God in our services. There is a Reformation principle of To God Alone Be the Glory, and idolatry such as has been posted here, and still is, over in Spirituality, is the reason. Some people are weak-minded enough they should not be around songs that would cause them to worship Mary, or anything else as God. And the glory rightly belongs to God, and to give it to anyone else is robbing Him of His glory. He will deal with glory thieves and people who worship the creature rather than the Creator.

That is my turn. Now, yours. Please explain how your post lines up with the Catholic Church’s ecumenical efforts over the last 25 or so years. As you are an informed and knowledgeable Catholic (as opposed to such an ignorant hayseed such as myself), you know of what I speak. Or do you? I think such as thread as you have started here is in direct opposition to the desires of the Holy See in regard to ecumenism, but most Catholics around here really don’t seem to care about what they think over there in Rome, what authentic Catholic teaching is or what the Church teaches. More fun to make it up on your own. Thus questions like yours. Do you care what the official teaching of the Catholic Church is in regards to ecumenism? No, because you started this thread.
AMEN. I find the question really ridiculous because who in the world would anyone expect to hear Hail Holy Queen in another faith’s church?
It’s a thinly veiled attack and MOST uncharitable.

To the poster quoted here: Sorry friend. Some people believe in hitting people over the head with Our Lady. Which is exactly what she would hate. She was (IS) humble, sweet, meek, and devoted to her Son. Indeed, in every instance she takes nothing for herself, and always points us to Christ. If non-Catholics know that, they will do just fine in the eyes of Christ. They love their mothers, as we love ours. Mary of the mother of the Church. She loves all of us the same.
God bless you.
 
P.S. I don’t want to make a list of specific songs (though anyone’s certainly welcome to do so) but I’ll at least offer a list of types of songs:
  • songs honoring Mary or other saints in heaven (either by name or generally, canonized or uncanonized)
  • songs honoring someone having a birthday (or other anniversary/milestone)
  • songs at a wedding honoring the bride and groom
  • songs at a funeral honoring the deceased
  • songs honoring someone being baptized, confirmed, or receive holy communion for the first time
  • -]songs honoring a civic leader/-]-] or an entire country/-]
  • other songs that aren’t strictly about God
P.P.S. Anyone’s welcome to share your p.o.v. regarding the singing these types of songs in mass or service. You don’t have to be a Protestant. 🙂
Most of those are permitted in the Catholic church. You should know this.All can be done in the contest of FAITH. What is your intent with this thread? Are you a music minister? It appears not.
 
To the poster quoted here: Sorry friend. Some people believe in hitting people over the head with Our Lady. Which is exactly what she would hate. She was (IS) humble, sweet, meek, and devoted to her Son. Indeed, in every instance she takes nothing for herself, and always points us to Christ. If non-Catholics know that, they will do just fine in the eyes of Christ. They love their mothers, as we love ours. Mary of the mother of the Church. She loves all of us the same.
God bless you.
I’m not Tomyris but I’m also a non-Catholic that did wade into the morass of Mary topics earlier this week, so thank you for this post.

Some of the statements I’ve read about Mary and the actions of those who claim to love her, remind me of what Ghandi said about Christianity. “I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ”.
 
Partly, but not exclusively, in an effort to keep the original topic relevant to the thread, I’m wondering if other Catholics (and GKC 😉 :)) would be willing to weigh in on the singing of Happy Birthday etc during mass?
Never heard it. Our late rector would ask anyone with birthdays to come to the rail for a blessing. Since his passing, that has not been continued.

May I thank you for your perceptive manner of eliciting a reply from a certain category of folk?
 
I can say when I was a Protestant I found inconsistent the demonstrations of patriotism given the charges against Catholic practice. I thought it odd that a statue of the mother of God would be idolatry but a flag of the US government not, either both are or neither are. This is of course a generalization. Some Protestants like Mennonites and Quakers have in my opinion a more consistent stance by not having patriotic displays.

I have encountered some Protestants who do really want to take honor away from Mary. In fact I think any who want to deny the perpetual virginity are doing so. To be sure some really do want to deny this. I truly think they are motivated by not wanting Mary to receive honor.

I agree. I’ve known real life Catholics who are very orthodox today. But the faith they learned as a child was lacking in Jesus with the Blessed Virgin replacing Him in some way.
Many Protestants don’t believe in the perpetual virginity. I disagree with them but they are not intending to dishonor her. They honor her as they would a loving good mother. Many see her a the model mother of a large family.

I will always present reasons why I think they are missing the point but I will not accuse them of dishonoring her. She loves them just as much as she loves me. She is not offended in the honor given her as a simple faithful woman.
 
I see the smiley face so I am not that offended, but personally, while I find many of the Marian doctrines reasonable, I do find some of the popular piety around them to be off-putting.
Then do like me and give her the respect she deserves, but pray to her son instead. As I wasn’t a cradle Catholic, I have doubts I’ll ever be as Mary-focused as many Catholics. My priest tells me that’s “A-OK”.
But on the same token, I find it too jarringly anthropocentric to compare Mary to the mother of a secular judge.
Slow your roll.

Metaphor and simile are inherently flawed when trying to convey an idea by proxy.
…makes Jesus sound like a corruptible human judge from a place like Chicago, not the ultimate Judge who is the ultimate Justice.
The criteria of the Judge is His own. If he was unflinchingly fair, we’d all be damned to hell and no path to redemption would exist.
This kind of “hierarchy of prayer-ers” that seems to exist in Catholic thought, or at least “folk Catholic” thought, is very puzzling from a non-Catholic POV.
That doesn’t exist in MY thoughts… Maybe you’ve fashioned a “catholic bogey-man” for yourself?
Some of the statements I’ve read about Mary and the actions of those who claim to love her, remind me of what Ghandi said about Christianity. “I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ”.
There will be a disparity between Christ and the Christian until the end of days. It’s one of the central themes. The only guy to get it completely right was murdered about 1985 years ago. He’s the guy our religion is named after.
 
I’m not Tomyris but I’m also a non-Catholic that did wade into the morass of Mary topics earlier this week, so thank you for this post.

Some of the statements I’ve read about Mary and the actions of those who claim to love her, remind me of what Ghandi said about Christianity. “I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ”.
Well said.

It’s obviously too late now, but it occurs to me that I could have started this thread without saying that the question was for “Protestants who don’t believe in honoring Mary by e.g. singing “Hail Holy Queen” in church” (especially since I put a bad paraphrase of that as the thread title).

I mean I could have just said that the question was for everyone.
 
Never heard it. Our late rector would ask anyone with birthdays to come to the rail for a blessing. Since his passing, that has not been continued.
Thank you! Every time someone answers the actual question I was asking I feel like I could dance for joy. :dancing:.
 
AMEN. I find the question really ridiculous because who in the world would anyone expect to hear Hail Holy Queen in another faith’s church?
It’s a thinly veiled attack and MOST uncharitable.

To the poster quoted here: Sorry friend. Some people believe in hitting people over the head with Our Lady. Which is exactly what she would hate. She was (IS) humble, sweet, meek, and devoted to her Son. Indeed, in every instance she takes nothing for herself, and always points us to Christ. If non-Catholics know that, they will do just fine in the eyes of Christ. They love their mothers, as we love ours. Mary of the mother of the Church. She loves all of us the same.
God bless you.
Can’t recall Hail Holy Queen in my parish, I must admit.

Regular Sung Angelus, though, yes.
 
Thank you! Every time someone answers the actual question I was asking I feel like I could dance for joy. :dancing:.
You are very welcome. You have only to ask (in a manner that I can see is aimed at me) and I will try.
 
Many Protestants don’t believe in the perpetual virginity. I disagree with them but they are not intending to dishonor her. They honor her as they would a loving good mother. Many see her a the model mother of a large family.

I will always present reasons why I think they are missing the point but I will not accuse them of dishonoring her. She loves them just as much as she loves me. She is not offended in the honor given her as a simple faithful woman.
It depends on how you take the word dishonor. In the sense of taking honor away then I think many do intend that. I’ve encountered that. They want Mary to have less honor. Many object to the term ‘Blessed Virgin’ when it says quite clearly in Holy Scripture, 'from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed '. The early Protestant reformers have a much different approach to Mary than modern Protestants. The modern position is a purposeful rejection of the ancient and Catholic Faith.

We are exorted to ‘render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.’ In the context of the question what deserves more honor, a government that demands acceptance of abortion and same sex marriage or the mother of God? A lot of modern practice may be due to thoughtless repetition of tradition (and Catholics can be just as guilty of this). But it shouldn’t take much to correct a fair minded and sincere person.
 
Just because Luther was correct about some things does not mean he has to be correct about everything. Protestants agree that the Scriptures alone are the one infallible source of all church teaching. By accepting that Luther was indeed right about sola scriptura we also admit that indeed Luther could be and probably was wrong about other stuff.Luckily, we don’t have to just take Luther’s word on anything. Holy Scripture, not Luther, is our standard.

Entrust ourselves to Mary? Would she not rather us put our trust in her son? Mary was his mother. He loved her as his mother, and she loved him as a son. Nothing can take away from that relationship, but the mere fact that they had a Mother-Son relationship is not a good excuse to build an entire theology around Mary as some sort of mediator.

Grace didn’t enter the world through Mary. The incarnation of course could not have happened without Mary, and she was highly favored and blessed among all people to have been chosen by God. But God’s grace was already at work within the world even before Mary herself was born.

As for grace flowing through Mary today, where are we taught that in Scripture? What Scripture tells me is that it is"by grace you are saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, for it is the gift of God" (Ephesians 2:8). Since Mary was a human and in need of a savior also, she was saved by grace through faith in Christ Jesus.

That in no way diminishes her life and meaning to the church today. She is a role model for us all, pointing us to her son and encouraging us to “Do whatever he tells you” (John 2:5).
So we agree Luther was able to be wrong. Now the question becomes, how do we know what he was wrong about? Based on your response above, I you’d probably say he was wrong about Mary. I think it more likely he was wrong about Sola Scriptura. First of all, there is the matter of the canon. Protestants almost universally agree he was wrong about the canon and the Catholic Church was correct. Luther wanted James, Hebrews, Jude and Revelation removed from the Bible as non-inspired works. Second, Sola Scriptura simply doesn’t work. Using Sola Scriptura, you cannot prove to me what books belong in the Bible. This is because A.) there is no “inspired” writing telling us what counts as Scripture, and B.) even if there was, we are still left with the problem of circular reasoning. The Bible cannot be used to prove the Bible is inspired. We have to have something else.

This to say nothing of the various disagreements among protestants about how to interpret Scripture. Is Baptism necessary for salvation? Do we have to celebrate communion? What role do works play in our Christian life? Is abortion acceptable? Is contraception? What about same-sex marriage?

Protestants debate the correct answer to all of those questions, and because the Bible is their only authority to go by they cannot say for certain the other side is wrong because both find support for their position in Scripture.

As for Grace flowing through Mary, we know that God is unchanging. Hebrews 13:8 - Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever. Malachi 3:6 - I the Lord do not change. James 1:17 - Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.

And we know that while God did not NEED to use Mary, He chose to use Mary to bring Salvation to the world. So, properly understanding that is Christ who is our Savior, we can and should go to Mary asking her to bring us to Christ just as she did by being the Mother of God.
 
Not to sound disrespectful to the Mother of God, but how does Mary intercede for millions of people in the world at once, since She is/was human, all be it the most holy human (who was human and only human, not to discount the human nature of Christ and the hypostatic union) who ever lived, and not omniscient?
This is probably the best explanation I’ve found for this question:

"Indeed, the Scriptures tell us over and over that in heaven we shall “see” God with our mind and heart, and contemplate God with the eyes of the soul (so to speak) in a new and glorious way: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God” (Mt 5:8); “Now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face” (1 Cor 13:12); “We shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as he is” (1 Jn 3:2).

Think of it this way: to see God “as He is,” “face to face,” and to “contemplate” God in all his heavenly glory must be an indescribable experience, but it is the wonderful destiny He has in store for all of us who love and trust Him. We cannot fully understand what that means, from this side of heaven. But we know one thing for sure: to see and know and contemplate God in heaven must include to see and know and contemplate all that God loves — for how could you really see and know God “as He is” without seeing everything He loves, and without seeing how He loves everything? For “God is love” (1 Jn 4:8). And one of the things God loves best of all is human beings, the creatures He made in his own image, and for whom He gave His life on the Cross. The saints in heaven, therefore, must surely see and know all about us on earth, because they see us reflected in the mind and heart of the God who loves us, whom they behold face to face. The saints in heaven know us because they know all about God’s love for us, and — being filled with His love for us — they love us too." Source: thedivinemercy.org/news/How-Can-the-Saints-Hear-and-Answer-Our-Prayers-2859
This idea that “hey, maybe Mary can use her pull with Jesus to your advantage, and he just might give you a wink and nod and a pass to Heaven even though you really should go to Hell” makes Jesus sound like a corruptible human judge from a place like Chicago, not the ultimate Judge who is the ultimate Justice. As Father Ruggerio has stated, it assumes Mary is more merciful than God himself, and that is not the case.
Jesus is not corruptible, which is precisely why Mary can “use her pull with Jesus.” It is a corruption when we disobey our parents. Jesus always obeys His parents precisely because He is not corrupted as we are. It is also important to note that Mary, by a special grace of God bestowed in anticipation of the Cross, was Immaculately Conceived. She has free will like we do, but her will is perfectly united to the will of God. So if she asks Jesus to do something, she’s not asking Him to do something that was not already His will.
Then do like me and give her the respect she deserves, but pray to her son instead. As I wasn’t a cradle Catholic, I have doubts I’ll ever be as Mary-focused as many Catholics. My priest tells me that’s “A-OK”.
I’m also a convert, and while I won’t disagree with your priest about it being okay to be less “Mary-focused,” I would challenge you only on the idea you’ll never be the same as many Catholics. Things happen in our lives that change our perspective on a variety of things in many ways. I say this because I’ve been there.
 
Or more precisely, a question for Protestants who don’t believe in honoring Mary by e.g. singing “Hail Holy Queen” in church.

How do you feel about e.g. singing patriotic songs in church?

(Or for that matter, any songs that aren’t strictly about God.)
My church does not sing patriotic songs or have flags in the building. There are many churches that do incorporate these elements into regular worship or have special church services for the celebration of patriotic holidays. I think a small amount of patriotism in church is ok, but it can be taken too far leading to a blurring of the lines between God’s will and national interests.

I don’t think churches disagree on whether Mary should or should not be honored, but the disagreement is how she should be honored. There is a difference between singing a song in honor of Mary or singing a certain song that honors the good qualities of a nation and praying to or through Mary for intercession. I don’t think any church that sings songs to honor a nation is seeking intercession from the nation or from national leaders who are now in heaven. There seems to be a distinction between showing honor and seeking intercession. Churches seem to disagree about whether seeking intercession is or isn’t an appropriate way to honor Mary.
 
But it might be healthy to at least recognize that Pentecostalism, just like every protestant denomination, is trying to restore their vision of “the True, Original, Primitive Church”. And everywhere we look in the first centuries of Christianity, Mary was a “big deal”
What do you mean by a “big deal?” What evidence is there that Mary was a “big deal” in the first few centuries?
 
Many Protestants don’t believe in the perpetual virginity. I disagree with them but they are not intending to dishonor her. They honor her as they would a loving good mother. Many see her a the model mother of a large family.

I will always present reasons why I think they are missing the point but I will not accuse them of dishonoring her. She loves them just as much as she loves me. She is not offended in the honor given her as a simple faithful woman.
Good day

I appreciate your post as I certainly do not intend to dishonour Mary.

Your post just made me think of something I never truly grasped. I certainly think perpetual virginity is possible (although no actual proof). But the following question I never got to terms myself, “Why is that so important?”. I certainly would not think it refutes your claim or proves mine either way.

Would the perpetual virginity disprove any Marian devotion/belief? I personally don’t think so? So seeing as you stated that first I would just like to know why you deem that important in any way?

Regards
 
Metaphor and simile are inherently flawed when trying to convey an idea by proxy.

The criteria of the Judge is His own. If he was unflinchingly fair, we’d all be damned to hell and no path to redemption would exist.
That is fine and I figured, from the smiley face, that you are acknowledging your statement was an inherently flawed metaphor.

This unfortunately has not been the case for some Catholics whose attitude about Mary is very condescending at best, hostile at worst to those who do not understand or agree with venerating Mary. Now, I don’t think Peter J himself meant to be. But some of the arguments come with a snide insinuation that “Mary’s role as an advocate is so obvious, here’s a simple analogy to prove it, see, can’t even YOU can understand it now, you silly ignorant Mary-hating heretic?” I have also seen what Tomyris described in a more, well, detailed way.

I’d say the same about the oft-seen analogy, that to ask Mary for her intercession, is the same as a little kid going to merciful Mom instead of angry Dad after accidentally breaking a vase.
That doesn’t exist in MY thoughts… Maybe you’ve fashioned a “catholic bogey-man” for yourself?
I will say that many non-Catholic Christians find the idea of any mediator or advocate other than Jesus, to be pointless even if true. When they see Catholics emphasize praying to Mary and the saints the reaction is often, “okay, maybe this isn’t actually worship the same way as we’d worship God, but why should we bother to go through Mary, when we can just pray to Jesus directly?”

After all, Jesus himself gave us the Lord’s prayer, he actually encouraged us to pray to the Father himself, he didn’t say “Don’t dare pray to the Father, you’re too unworthy, you should pray to my mother instead.”

It seems that when confronted with the “why should we even bother to pray to Mary or other saints” question, many Catholics claim that, essentially, God doesn’t really care about a little sinner like you, you need to get Mary and the saints to pray for you, before He’d even pay attention to your woes. This sounds very close to advice for a small grassroots charity to hire some professional lobbyists to be sure their cause gets a hearing in Congress.

And so many non-Catholics conclude “OK, so you want us to join your Church so we can move farther away from Jesus, and not pray to God, but pray to the saint-lobbyists instead? Why in the world would we want to do THAT, why should we give up a personal relationship with Jesus and approach him through intermediaries?”
Jesus is not corruptible, which is precisely why Mary can “use her pull with Jesus.” It is a corruption when we disobey our parents. Jesus always obeys His parents precisely because He is not corrupted as we are.
But the Church does NOT teach that adults still have a duty to obey their parents, they are not obligated to, say, go to medical school because the parents want them to, or to refuse a Priestly vocation if the parents want their son to get married and give them grandkids. It is not “corrupt” to refuse to obey parents when they ask such things.

And not even minor children have the duty to obey their parents, if they command them to sin. Now, I realize Mary would not command Jesus to sin, but that is where this human analogy falls apart.
It is also important to note that Mary, by a special grace of God bestowed in anticipation of the Cross, was Immaculately Conceived. She has free will like we do, but her will is perfectly united to the will of God. So if she asks Jesus to do something, she’s not asking Him to do something that was not already His will
This does make sense, but then again we get to the question, “Why should we even bother to ask Mary’s assistance, if it doesn’t change what God’s will is for us?”

The answers to that question, so far, are unconvincing to me.
 
Good day

I appreciate your post as I certainly do not intend to dishonour Mary.

Your post just made me think of something I never truly grasped. I certainly think perpetual virginity is possible (although no actual proof). But the following question I never got to terms myself, “Why is that so important?”. I certainly would not think it refutes your claim or proves mine either way.

Would the perpetual virginity disprove any Marian devotion/belief? I personally don’t think so? So seeing as you stated that first I would just like to know why you deem that important in any way?

Regards
It’s not so much that disproving the perpetual virginity would disprove other beliefs (though we would have to stop referring to her as “Mary, ever-virgin”). The problem lies more in what it means for us as Christians if Mary had other sons.

We often forget that our faith is an ancient faith, and we disconnect the Scriptures from the historical and cultural context in which they were written. We don’t always mean to do this, but it happens often as a byproduct of trying to apply the Scriptures to our lives today.

One of the things we forget is the law of inheritance. I tried to find the article I read recently about exactly what this means, but the short version is that if Mary had other sons after Jesus - even if they weren’t conceived by the Holy Spirit - they would be his brothers and would take a share of his inheritance before the rest of us who are His adopted brothers and sisters by our Baptism. Basically, Mary having other children sets up a hierarchy of Grace. While this fits with the customs and laws of that time period, it doesn’t fit with what God has revealed to us about Salvation.

I’ll keep looking for the article because it explains it a lot better than I do.
 
Good day

I appreciate your post as I certainly do not intend to dishonour Mary.

Your post just made me think of something I never truly grasped. I certainly think perpetual virginity is possible (although no actual proof). But the following question I never got to terms myself, “Why is that so important?”. I certainly would not think it refutes your claim or proves mine either way.

Would the perpetual virginity disprove any Marian devotion/belief? I personally don’t think so? So seeing as you stated that first I would just like to know why you deem that important in any way?

Regards
I don’t have an answer to your question. I base my reasoning on several basic human problems that I see with Mary not being a perpetual virgin.

1: I can’t imagine any man who worships God as Joseph did would have the ego great enough to even think of Mary in a nuptial way. I am not saying that this would have been wrong but think about it. She carried God in her womb. She was a holy ark. The bearer of God’s Son. That in its self would be a huge ego trip. I just can’t see Joseph wanting an ego trip of that magnitude.

2: Raising Jesus, the son of God, would be a tremendous responsibility. It would not have been fair for the other children. If you read enough of the Bible and just look around you will see sibling jealousy is a problem to contend with.

3: If Mary had other children, can you imagine them and Jesus allowing her to be in danger that final week. Unless Jesus was an only child and had a great part for her to play in salvation’s story, I can not imagine Him, knowing full well what was going to happen, allowing her to be there if there was a safe place for her to be.

I realize these are not theological reasons. And these are not the only reasons for me to believe that Mary, the Mother God, is important in the story of our salvation. But they are practical down to earthly problems that should be considered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top