First, please do not miss the fact that I am a Free Methodist Minister. I cannot speak officially for my own church, much less the Catholic Church
This whole matter is very complex and much more involved then one might think. I reject the idea of a “pre-tribulation” rapture, first of all because it results in many Biblical problems that simply are not there is one accepts the traditional “post-tribulation” viewpoint. It would take more space than we have here to explain it all, but that is the bottom line.
Second, as a Wesleyan, I recognize the value of tradition (or the view of the church through the centuries) in matter not essential to salvation. Many views have been throughout the history of the church - but the “pre-tribulation rapture” was unheard of before 1830. Before then, it was not even a minority view. Furthermore, it began as a “revelation” given to a 13 year old girl. Only after this was a Scriptural case built for it. It is not reasonable to expect that no one would have seen this truth for the first 1800 years of the church.
Well said Pastorw,
actually some of the best critics of the rapture pre-trib are other Protestants and it is unfortunate that you are undercut by a number of books out there such as the left behind series, The Late Great Planet Earth Etc. Good luck and thanks for your post. You demonstrate very well the problem of para-church ministries that put out and teach whatever but have no accountability for what they teach.
Finally, I think it is significant that in my denomination - which does not take a specific position on the rapture - about 2/3 of the ministers I have met are “post-trib”, whie the vast majority of laypeople are “pre-trib”. This says a lot. The pre-tribulation rapture is basically “popular theology” that is mostly promoted in the Christian media. It is rejected by most Evangelical Clergy.
Anyway, that’s my .02 worth. Since this doctrine got started in Evangelical circles, I thought this might help./QUOTE