How many straight people do you know who WANT to be gay?Why is the “technology” only being used to make homosexuals straight? Why aren’t gay groups using the same technology to convert straights to their “team”? You’d think gay groups would be chomping at the bits to get their hands on such revolutionary technology.
You are joking but I could not get your point…Why is the “technology” only being used to make homosexuals straight? Why aren’t gay groups using the same technology to convert straights to their “team”? You’d think gay groups would be chomping at the bits to get their hands on such revolutionary technology.
What technology?Why is the “technology” only being used to make homosexuals straight? Why aren’t gay groups using the same technology to convert straights to their “team”? You’d think gay groups would be chomping at the bits to get their hands on such revolutionary technology.
RUN FOR THE HILLS IT’S THE GAY MACHINE!!:bigyikes:Why is the “technology” only being used to make homosexuals straight? Why aren’t gay groups using the same technology to convert straights to their “team”? You’d think gay groups would be chomping at the bits to get their hands on such revolutionary technology.
I presume you mean fruit machine?RUN FOR THE HILLS IT’S THE GAY MACHINE!!:bigyikes:
The process, the steps involved in going from straight to gay. If it’s true that homosexuals can become “ex-gay,” then why isn’t that same process being used for homosexual activists to recruit straights to their team? Shouldn’t it be a falsifiable process subject to the scientific method, or what exactly is being done - besides praying the gay away - to become “ex-gay”? If it really is true that homosexuals can become “ex-gay,” why aren’t the “ex-gay” proponents doing more to disseminate and publicize the steps concerned parents need to do. It seems awfully mean, uncharitable, and downright un-Christian to withhold (or worse, profit from) the processes involved to from straight to gay. It’s not like we’re talking about Col. Sander’s secret recipe from KFC - we’re talking about the salvation of the homosexuals’ souls.What technology?
The activists have the secular world’s most effective team working for them, a well-oiled machine called The Mainstream Media, represented, in order of prominence, bywhy isn’t that same process being used for homosexual activists to recruit straights to their team?
Whatever you are talking about is not “technology”!!The process, the steps involved in going from straight to gay. If it’s true that homosexuals can become “ex-gay,” then why isn’t that same process being used for homosexual activists to recruit straights to their team? Shouldn’t it be a falsifiable process subject to the scientific method, or what exactly is being done - besides praying the gay away - to become “ex-gay”? If it really is true that homosexuals can become “ex-gay,” why aren’t the “ex-gay” proponents doing more to disseminate and publicize the steps concerned parents need to do. It seems awfully mean, uncharitable, and downright un-Christian to withhold (or worse, profit from) the processes involved to from straight to gay. It’s not like we’re talking about Col. Sander’s secret recipe from KFC - we’re talking about the salvation of the homosexuals’ souls.
According to the dictionary (Merriam-Webster, specifically), “technology” is defined as: *the practical application of knowledge in a particular area. *Whatever you are talking about is not “technology”!!
I cannot say what I really think about this thread because I will get sanctioned by the moderators.According to the dictionary (Merriam-Webster, specifically), “technology” is defined as: *the practical application of knowledge in a particular area. *
Source: merriam-webster.com/dictionary/technology
That said, it is grammatically correct to describe efforts to turn homosexuals into heterosexuals as “technology,” because it is the application of knowledge in particular area - namely, becoming “ex-gay.” Going back to my original question, if there’s such a thing as “ex-gay,” then why isn’t this “technology” being used by gay activists to recruit heterosexuals to their team?
Why would you be sanctioned? I’m under the impression all the forum moderators subscribe to the whole “ex-gay” thing and the notion of “SSA” (it’s called homosexuality, not SSA) and therefore you’d be covered. As for me, I’m the one who has to watch what I say, since those of us who don’t believe in SSA and don’t believe in “ex-gay” are always on the firing range and in the pin-hairs any time we post anything.I cannot say what I really think about this thread because I will get sanctioned by the moderators.
What is your agenda, please?Why would you be sanctioned? I’m under the impression all the forum moderators subscribe to the whole “ex-gay” thing and the notion of “SSA” (it’s called homosexuality, not SSA) and therefore you’d be covered. As for me, I’m the one who has to watch what I say, since those of us who don’t believe in SSA and don’t believe in “ex-gay” are always on the firing range and in the pin-hairs any time we post anything.
Man has been sinning without the aid of technology since Adam and Eve ate the apple.Why is the “technology” only being used to make homosexuals straight? Why aren’t gay groups using the same technology to convert straights to their “team”? You’d think gay groups would be chomping at the bits to get their hands on such revolutionary technology.