T
Theo520
Guest
It was a very different time than today, what was appropriate then is not appropriate now.
In general, I think they were trying to look out for the welfare of the children.
From your response, you probably aren’t aware but the other practice of the day was to force a couple to get married because of the expected child, OUT OF OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY, NOT LOVE!!!
In general, I think they were trying to look out for the welfare of the children.
From your response, you probably aren’t aware but the other practice of the day was to force a couple to get married because of the expected child, OUT OF OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY, NOT LOVE!!!
Er what?
The Church tore babies from mothers and sold them.
google “Bessborough” and read some of the facts of this. Some of the suffering caused.
In England they tended to send them to eg Australia. In Ireland it was to America. The babies to be sold were carefully chosen, from the higher class families, were well fed and cared for … good genetics.
The Church “could” easily have helped in many other ways.
It was a moral judgement on the “fallen women” .
most of the remaining babies were raised in orphanages, those who did nto perish in infancy