F
Fiasco
Guest
Hardly!I appreciate the prayers, but I am not being cynical. If I lived in Rome 300 years ago,** I would be dead or in prison for my opinions**. The sooner we stop making excuses for that the better.
Hardly!I appreciate the prayers, but I am not being cynical. If I lived in Rome 300 years ago,** I would be dead or in prison for my opinions**. The sooner we stop making excuses for that the better.
I appreciate the prayers, but I am not being cynical. If I lived in Rome 300 years ago, I would be dead or in prison for my opinions. The sooner we stop making excuses for that the better.
Highly unlikely, no matter what your views were. If you were part of the small population who were educated and a teacher, then you may have had a problem.I appreciate the prayers, but I am not being cynical. If I lived in Rome 300 years ago, I would be dead or in prison for my opinions. The sooner we stop making excuses for that the better.
When have Freemason been imprisoned or killed?Let’s say I was a Freemason.
If you didn’t notice that link (at Post #21) to a BBC documentary about the Spanish Inquisition, here it is again. It was downloaded, and played back OK:
My jaw has hit the floor after several of these( naive) posts
This old geezer is confused. Which link?Wait was that link uploaded with permission from the copyright owner.
God Bless
Indeed, I don’t see the problem with this, either.This guilt is ridiculous. We’re talking about the raping monsters who slaughtered and enslaved Christians on an industrial scale. No sympathy for them or any collaborators (Jews, Mystics, etc.)
Atrocities against the Saxons and Pagans of the Baltic countries? The Saxons asked for it, they were the first to attack - after the Saxons were beaten for the third time, Charlemagne got enough and punished them.No point whatsoever feeling guilt about the crusades or inquisition. Just the natural response to defend christendom against islamic expansion into europe.
The main atrocities were actually comitted against europeans, the massacre of Verdun for instance, when Charlamegne slaughtered the pagan Saxons of Germany.
Or the the attacks on the Baltic pagans by the teutonic knights
interesting, i’m not saying we need feel guilt about it. but the mass beheading of the saxons leaders for instance, not a catholic thing to doAtrocities against the Saxons and Pagans of the Baltic countries? The Saxons asked for it, they were the first to attack - after the Saxons were beaten for the third time, Charlemagne got enough and punished them.
Also, the Pagans in the Baltic countries asked for it, they were a threat just like Islam was and still is.
The Bible doesn’t forbid us from punishing (even killing) the enemies. But yeah, if a peaceful solution is possible, go for it.interesting, i’m not saying we need feel guilt about it. but the mass beheading of the saxons leaders for instance, not a catholic thing to do
OT or NT?Indeed, I don’t see the problem with this, either.
As for the Christians being disgusted with this, open up your Bible and read ALL of it, you’ll quickly see, that we aren’t supposed to bend over for enemies.
I think you misunderstand some of the teachings in the Bible. As I won’t bother explaining it myself, this link provides some well-written stuff: realclearreligion.org/articles/2014/04/30/the_myth_of_a_non-violent_jesus.htmlOT or NT?
NT rightly takes over from OT on many issues, Jesus IS the New Covenant
300 years ago, the scientific establishment believed that humans had four “humours” that had to stay in balance in order for a person to be healthy; that diseases were caused by “bad air”; that continents do not move, but are fixed in place.If I lived in Rome 300 years ago, I would be dead or in prison for my opinions. The sooner we stop making excuses for that the better.
Many thanks for a straight-to-the-point article.For those throwing the Galileo controversy out there, please read:
catholic.com/tract/the-galileo-controversy