C
Christian_Unity
Guest
Protestants believe in baptism too.Christian Unity,
Post 226 answers your question…Paul came to bring the Gentiles to Christ. That phrase does not imply that he did not baptize either.
Protestants believe in baptism too.Christian Unity,
Post 226 answers your question…Paul came to bring the Gentiles to Christ. That phrase does not imply that he did not baptize either.
I wonder how you know? If the officers of the Church had not doubt, why do you?I don’t disagree with anything you said, however, in practice I have never known of a Protestant (Mormons and JW’s aside) who’s Baptism has not been accepted by the Church as valid, at least in the parishes in which I have been a member. Baptist baptisms have always been accepted and I know their intention is not the intention of the Church.
See 1 Cor 1 as the requirment to understand the Scriptures. If the Holy Spirit dwells in the believer, and if a Catholic is no longer in a state of grace based on mortal sin, etc… then does the Holy Spirit leave the Catholic believer during that time of not being in a state of grace?Not in the same sense that the Sacraments give grace, since it seems to me that one must be in a state of grace in order to hear and correctly understand the Scriptures - there are many who twist the meaning, to their own destruction - and a person who is not in a state of grace can easily turn to a way that seems right in his own eyes, instead of to God’s way.
I believe that the power of the Holy Spirit becomes “deactivated” in a sense. My personal experience is that when I go to Confession, everything just makes way more sense, afterwards, than it did before.See 1 Cor 1 as the requirment to understand the Scriptures. If the Holy Spirit dwells in the believer, and if a Catholic is no longer in a state of grace based on mortal sin, etc… then does the Holy Spirit leave the Catholic believer during that time of not being in a state of grace?
Hi guan. I’ll let our Anglican siblings clarify.=guanophore;10053956]I know the original Anglicans did, because they continued in the Apostolic faith. However, so many Anglicans are falling away from the faith progressively I think there are many that no longer hold this faith. I recently read a poll that Anglicans had fallen away from this part of the One Faith.
Yep.Why does it seem that justification by faith alone would contradict baptismal regeneration? I wonder if you have been taught that sacraments are “work” that humans do? Luther believed as the Catholic faith taught him that the sacraments are given in, by, and through God’s grace. Baptism is a gift of God that washes away our sins.
I think that Reformed Christians, and most evangelical blible Christians have separated the baptism of the HS from the water. So when they read “one baptism” it translates into “once saved”, and has nothing to do with water. I learned about this separation here on CAF, and have always found it rather curious.
It is this, among other things such as the Lord’s Supper and soteriology, that requires me to say what I said to De Maria earlier, that I would be Catholic long before virtually any other protestant group.If the “One Baptism” refers to the moment a person hears the Gospel preached and is saved by it, then what is the water baptism that is usually received later as “public testimony”? This concept is also not anywhere in scripture as a purpose for getting baptized.
That is what “mortal” sin means. The soul has died. The Holy Spirit has left. The Spirit does not return until the person repents and confesses his sins in the Sacrament of Reconciliation.See 1 Cor 1 as the requirment to understand the Scriptures. If the Holy Spirit dwells in the believer, and if a Catholic is no longer in a state of grace based on mortal sin, etc… then does the Holy Spirit leave the Catholic believer during that time of not being in a state of grace?
I have no idea what that means.I guess I should take the label of being “half saved” on a Catholic Forum site, considering it is hersey by Catholic theology to boast that you 100% saved.
Protestants have human assurance. You can keep it.If I’m half saved, Catholics are maybe 33% saved since we Protestants have greater assurance than you based on a forensic justification belief.
CU,I guess I should take the label of being “half saved” on a Catholic Forum site, considering it is hersey by Catholic theology to boast that you 100% saved. If I’m half saved, Catholics are maybe 33% saved** since we Protestants have greater assurance than you based on a forensic justification belief**.
CU,You have to understand that Protestants interpret that as the baptism done by the Spirit of God and not by the hands of men. Let me find verses to help you understand the Protestant perspective.
Sanctifying grace regenerates. You mean you consider it a means of ordinary grace.I think it is safe to say that we disagree agreeably on the sacrament of baptism. I do believe it is a means of sanctifying grace, but do not agree that it regenerates.
That doesn’t make it false. It just means that it is hard to understand.It is hard to follow the Catholic view.
No. His faith makes him pleasing to God. And he is united to God by that faith. But faith does not regenerate. God regenerates those who by faith in His Son, submit to the Sacrament of Baptism.If a person hears the gospel and receives it, are you trying to say that person is not united to Christ by faith until that person partakes in the sacrament of baptism?
Yes. He must produce works meet for repentance:And if that person is not Catholic, does that person need to go to all of the training classes first prior to being baptized?
The Catholic Church is Christendom. The Catholic Church is God’s Kingdom on earth.And in addition, the Catholic Church reserves the right to determine if a Protestant baptism is valid, even though that Christian is not Catholic? Boy… the Catholic Church likes to try to control Christendom.
It is Protestant doctrine which makes no biblical sense.IMO… the key to becoming Catholic is to believe in apostolic succession Catholic version. If you can believe that, then you can believe everything else what the Catholic Church believes and teaches. If you reject apostolic sucession Catholic version, then so much of Catholic doctrine makes no biblcal sense.
Interestingly, some Orthodox rebaptize Catholics, from what I’ve heardBoy… the Catholic Church likes to try to control Christendom.
Yes, I have probably spoken too broadly but it is hardly a secret what Baptists, for instance, believe about baptism and therefore I don’t think I am too far off in making the point I am making. As I have stated, I always defer to the Church in matters faith, I am just trying to understand and will be having this discussion with my priest tomorrow. As far as doubt is concerned, I have no doubt that the Church is correct in its judgment and the fact that I don’t understand how they arrive there is of no consequence. It certainly doesn’t make me doubt my Church, if that’s what you mean.I wonder how you know? If the officers of the Church had not doubt, why do you?
God the Holy Spirit is the thrid person of the Holy Trinity with same sovereign attributes of God the Father. Therefore, I don’t think we can deactivate the Spirit of God. I guess that goes into a deeper discussion and debate regarding the ministry of the Holy Spirit in whom He is trying to save.I believe that the power of the Holy Spirit becomes “deactivated” in a sense. My personal experience is that when I go to Confession, everything just makes way more sense, afterwards, than it did before.
I think the Spirit baptizes the elect to Christ at the point of when the Spirit opens the heart of the individual elect, enabling the sinner to spirituality see Christ as being desirable, so that the elect freely comes to Christ upon hearing the gospel proclaimed. I believe water baptism done by the hands of men through the sacrament of baptism represents what the Spirit does apart from and before the sacrament of baptism. I am interested to hear if Lutherans believe in adult baptismal regeneration since Luther coined justification by faith alone. I’m okay with infant baptismal regeneration in which Luther believed after leaving the Catholic Church. It is true that believers are to be baptized as an act of obdience… which the sacrament is a means of sanctifying grace.CU,
A question based on this approach that you’ve mentioned more than once. When Jesus says, "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”
He is speaking to His disciples. Is He talking about Baptism by human hands, and if so, is this different than Baptism by the Spirit?
Jon
That’s a good one and makes perfect sense since with have two mutually exclusive claims of apostolic succession.Interestingly, some Orthodox rebaptize Catholics, from what I’ve heard
Jon
God never forces himself upon us. If we choose to not follow the guidance of the Holy Spirit he certainly allows us to do that. In effect we do deactivate the Spirit of God by refusing his grace and God allows it because we are free, rational beings.God the Holy Spirit is the thrid person of the Holy Trinity with same sovereign attributes of God the Father. Therefore, I don’t think we can deactivate the Spirit of God. I guess that goes into a deeper discussion and debate regarding the ministry of the Holy Spirit in whom He is trying to save.
Now, that’s an unbiblical view… we can start a new thread on that one. I side with Augustine on this debate of the sovereignity of God. Please start with Romans 9 and Ephesian 1, and John 1 and John 6 … and then maybe we should start a thread on predestination and free will. Augustine is the man who crushed Pelagius!God never forces himself upon us. If we choose to not follow the guidance of the Holy Spirit he certainly allows us to do that. In effect we do deactivate the Spirit of God by refusing his grace and God allows it because we are free, rational beings.
By what authority have you pronounced them all valid?Then by what authority have you pronouced the baptisms of Protestants “not valid” and assess that they have “no faith at all”…
The unbiblical view is the idea that God forces people to do His will.Now, that’s an unbiblical view…
As do we. The Catholic doctrine is Augustinian.. we can start a new thread on that one. I side with St. Augustine on this debate of the sovereignity of God.
The Catholic Church crushed Pelagius with the help of St. Augustine.Please start with Romans 9 and Ephesian 1, and John 1 and John 6 … and then maybe we should start a thread on predestination and free will. Augustine is the man who crushed Pelagius!