T
TheLittleLady
Guest
Actually, God designed the male and female anatomy to be complimentary. Modern thinking has conditioned people to disregard this design.
Touching your spouse is not masturbation. Touching your spouse in certain ways to stimulate them to climax could be masturbation.So in the eyes of the Church, masturbation doesn’t “count” as such if not taken to completion?
The OP already established they were not having intercourse. My reply is within that context, not in the context of assisting the wife before/during/after intercourse.If you want your wife to climax, you probably have to do the latter though? It’s not common for women to achieve it through normal intercourse, hence we tend to hear about women not being satisfied enough
That is certainly true as far as the rules for some NFP methods.Abstinence is abstinence of genital activity.
I don’t need a biology lesson.You see, the feminine nerve center for sexual stimulation - the clitoris - is not in the direct path of friction in typical intercourse. It’s located juuuust above that path (unlike the male nerve center, the glans, which is front-and-center).
If I was drinking coffee, I’d have spat/blown it all over my screen.The “women must lay back, close their eyes and think of England” variation of Christian sexual morality gets tiresome.
I don’t need a biology lesson.
No, I meant “vaginal”.Note you say “typical” intercourse. I assume you mean the “missionary” position.
Not with the mechanical function of penetrative, reproductive sex, there isn’t.There are other positions that facilitate the stimulation of the clitoris.
Hard-liners on masturbation might disagree with you here.And there is no rule that says that the man can’t use hands within the context of normal intercourse.
Forgive me if I don’t take your word for it.Not with the mechanical function of penetrative, reproductive sex, there isn’t.
You might want to educate yourself on the Gräfenberg spot.Not with the mechanical function of penetrative, reproductive sex, there isn’t.
The reality is that the male orgasm is essential to the reproduction of most sexual species while the female equivalent is not essential. Your designed/evolved form reflects this fact.
You needn’t. Anatomy isn’t subject to opinion.Forgive me if I don’t take your word for it.
I’m familiar.You might want to educate yourself on the Gräfenberg spot.
I never said it wasn’t beneficial. I only said that it’s not reproductively necessary. And it’s not. Most women report being unable to climax from regular vaginal intercourse at all; yours and Adam’s objections duly noted.Also, the contractions to the female…
Verily, but creation has fallen.God’s design is perfect.
Masturbation is touching oneself. Touching your spouse is not masturbation. Mutual masturbation is not spouses touching each other. It is spouses touching themselves simultaneously.Depends on whether you fool around and stop (fine) or fool around and climax in some other way (manual/oral) without intercourse (not fine).
So in the eyes of the Church, masturbation doesn’t “count” as such if not taken to completion?
Touching your spouse is not masturbation. Touching your spouse in certain ways to stimulate them to climax could be masturbation.