Forgiveness & Love

  • Thread starter Thread starter doubtThomas
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

doubtThomas

Guest
Friends of ours have recently separated. The wife cannot forgive her husband for his wrongdoing. Can their be any chance of reconciliation without forgiveness? How can she continue to say that “she still cares for and loves her husband?” How can the heart be unforgiving and loving at the same time? 🤷
 
Friends of ours have recently separated. The wife cannot forgive her husband for his wrongdoing. Can their be any chance of reconciliation without forgiveness? How can she continue to say that “she still cares for and loves her husband?” How can the heart be unforgiving and loving at the same time? 🤷
I could definitely be wrong, but my father and I have done a lot of thinking and talking about forgiveness over the last 25 years. Back in 1989, a young woman who was like a sister to me and my brothers and sisters, was carjacked and murdered. The men who did it were caught and convicted. One of them was executed. I mention this because we have had to do a lot of work to get to the point of forgiveness, and I think we have some insight into what it means to forgive.

I think the essence of forgiveness is to permanently and irrevocably renounce any right you have to demand restitution or repayment, including a debt that could never be fully repayed. If you think about how the word is used in the Gospel, particularly in the Lord’s Prayer, I think it is used precisely in that way. An important part of forgiveness is the commitment never to hold over their head the fact that you have forgiven someone. That is to say, at least in terms of your willingness to maintain good relations with the offender/debtor, it must be as if the debt was never owed, or the offense never committed.

This is not to say that you must forget that the offense was committed. For example, in the case of adultery, a spouse who has forgiven the adulterous spouse must be willing never to use the adultery as ammunition in a future argument over money, or which movie to watch on Saturday night. But they don’t have to pretend the first instance of adultery never occurred when they catch the spouse in second affair. So as long as the offender is truly repentant for their offense, the forgiver must continue to forgive.

Forgiveness is something that we humans beings must renew from time to time. As emotions related to the original offense resurface, we must make the choice to forgive that offense yet again, sometimes just because we had already chosen to do so, and we refuse to go back on our word.

So, to answer the OP’s question, there can be no real reconciliation without real forgiveness. But forgiveness can take time. Sometimes it can take a lot of time, and will come only after the offended party learns some hard lessons. Often these lessons will involve the discovery of their own need for forgiveness, perhaps even the need to be forgiven for refusing to forgive others. So, yes. She can still love her husband and at the same time not yet be ready to forgive him. The fact that she says she still loves him and cares for him is a very good sign. We are creatures existing in time, and she may simply not be ready to let go of her right to demand satisfaction for whatever offenses her husband committed against her. Help her, over time (but not too much time!), to understand what forgiveness means, and to see how true love demands at least the willingness to move toward forgiveness, even if you’re unable to get there just yet.

Another essential feature of forgiveness is that the offender must acknowledge their offense and ask to be forgiven.

If you think about how forgiveness works in our interpersonal relations, I think you’ll see that it works pretty much the same way in our relationship with God, with several notable differences, due to the fact that we are fallen creatures, and God is the perfect lover.

First, God needs no time to forgive. He is ready to forgive instantly, if we tell Him we’re sorry. Second, He has no need to renew His forgiveness, since His forgiveness is perfect the first time.
 
TechMan is on the mark. Forgiveness involves a willingness to let go of a desire for retribution, and that can take time. Reconciliation includes both that and also the components needed to rebuild a new relationship: renunciation of the wrong-doing, a willingness to make amends that demonstrates that one is worthy of trust, and so on. After all, God loves us very much and is always ready to forgive, yet we must repent and be willing to make amends in order to accept God’s invitation to full reconciliation.

OP, I think you are describing a situation where the wronged party has given up ill will (forgiven) and yet has decided that there is no room to return the offender to a position of trust. You can have a great deal of affection and gratitude towards someone and yet see that it is not appropriate to put them in the profound position of trust that marriage requires. Provided that the party being kept at a distance is actually guilty of the offense being held against him, he earned that. This is why canon law does not require spouses who are the victims of infidelity to re-admit the offending spouses to the common conjugal life, even though the marriage bond remains. Without true trust, that common life cannot happen. It is not fair to the wronged spouse to ask her to pretend that it can.
 
I’m currently going through a similar situation. I’m finding it hard to forgive my wife for what she has done. I dont wish any ill-will on my wife though. I’m generally the type of the person that wants the best for everyone, even those that cause me problems. As TechMan said above it is possible to forgive, but in many cases you never forget.
 
I’m currently going through a similar situation. I’m finding it hard to forgive my wife for what she has done. I dont wish any ill-will on my wife though. I’m generally the type of the person that wants the best for everyone, even those that cause me problems. As TechMan said above it is possible to forgive, but in many cases you never forget.
It is not even a matter of having to forget…that would be impossible! It is more being able to have emotional confidence that the offender will be trustworthy in the future in spite of having failed at being trustworthy in the past.

If a person were to embezzle from a bank, it would be one thing to accept their contrition and re-admit them to the community after they had expressed contrition and done what they could to make amends. It would be quite another to re-hire them to work in a position of trust at the bank, a place of trust well above that expected of the rank-and-file out of the community. It isn’t impossible to conceive of them getting a second chance, but it is also quite possible to forgive the offender and to love them without reservation without putting them in the position to re-offend and re-violate trust. In some cases, you would know you’d just be putting them in a near occasion of sin that they are unlikely to resist.

I guess that is where they got the old adage: “Fool me once: shame on you. Fool me twice: shame on me.” There is no guarantee that any person of any background will never ever betray trust, but it is up to the judgment of the person who will suffer to choose who gets to be in that position, even where there is a lifelong marriage bond. The spouse who violates the marriage bond sins even if the common conjugal life has been ended, but the spouse who violates both the marriage bond and the full confidence of a spouse with whom they share the common conjugal life commits an even greater sin, for they both violate their vow and crush the spirit of someone who trusted them with a position of greatest intimacy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top