F
Faithdancer
Guest
Well Mary could have said no. But I think God knew she would say yes, Him bein’ omniscient n’ all.Makes sense to me - as long as we don’t think about that free will thing.
Peace!!!
Well Mary could have said no. But I think God knew she would say yes, Him bein’ omniscient n’ all.Makes sense to me - as long as we don’t think about that free will thing.
Peace!!!
The immaculate conception was free will?Makes sense to me - as long as we don’t think about that free will thing.
Peace!!!
Yes, God indeed is omniscient! But that has nothing to do with Mary’s free will. He did know what her answer would be but he didn’t make here choose it. Similarly he knows what you are going to write on your next post in response to this, but look at all the clever options you have at THIS moment in time - before you actually click the “submit” button.Well Mary could have said no. But I think God knew she would say yes, Him bein’ omniscient n’ all.![]()
Immaculate Conception did not negate her free will.The immaculate conception was free will?
No, God didn’t force Mary and when I say she was chosen, it was at the beginning of time. I think He must have made her to be the kind of person who wouldn’t say no to a request from God, even though she could have. But only He knows.Yes, God indeed is omniscient! But that has nothing to do with Mary’s free will. He did know what her answer would be but he didn’t make here choose it. Similarly he knows what you are going to write on your next post in response to this, but look at all the clever options you have at THIS moment in time - before you actually click the “submit” button.
Peace!!!
Well, yes.The immaculate conception was free will?
Immaculate Conception did not negate her free will.
She had free will and was free to choose for or against God.
She chose for God and did not abuse her free will.
Adam and Eve were immaculately created as well but
they did abuse their free will and sinned.
I don’t know that I ever crossed that line. However, I do think that some folks, well-intentioned though they are, do cross that line.
I cant wait the hear your explanation for what seems like a contradiction in the above statements.No, God didn’t force Mary and when I say she was chosen, it was at the beginning of time. I think He must have made her to be the kind of person who wouldn’t say no to a request from God, even though she could have. But only He knows.
Mary was indeed blessed ,or in a state of happiness,in regards to her being that chosen vessel whereby the eternal Son of God ,would clothe himself ,“And being found in fashion as a man.”Christ is the means through which God created the carnate universe. But Jesus did not become carnate man Himself, only until there was Mary.
Only through Mary’s yes in her free will, did Our Lord come into this world.
Without Mary, we would not have Jesus. And what made Mary special, blessed above other women? Protestants cannot answer that.
"She put her hand to the nail,and her right hand to the workman's hammer;and with the hammer she emote Sisera,she's mote of his head,when she had pierced and stricken through the temples"
Though I greatly respect the women of the Bible you mention, you are extraordinarily cavalier in your opinion about Mary’s obedience not being ‘costly’ to her.Mary was indeed blessed ,or in a state of happiness,in regards to her being that chosen vessel whereby the eternal Son of God ,would clothe himself ,“And being found in fashion as a man.”
But that beautiful obedience that Mary ,in humility ,was wonderfully,found in submission to,was not I believe unique to her person.
Ruth for instance is beautifully found in subjection to her(spiritual) mother(in law) Naomi .
She was also a chosen vessel ( or channel) by which the promised seed should come.
Hannah with total abandonment ,as you will know ,committed ,and gave the( at that time,the only) fruit of her womb,unto The Lord: the child Samuel
Deborah ,called to a different ,but none the less vital submission ( to God) unto the salvation of Israel.
Of which salvation,( Judges 5) another women is marked out ( by scripture) verse 24:
“Blessed above women shall Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite be,blessed shall she be above women in the tent”
And wherefore:this blessed state?
Verse25-26 “He asked water,and she gave him milk;she brought forth butter in a lordly dish.”
Indeed,it might be argued,that marvellous,though it was ,and an example for all to follow,Mary’s obedience was not as costly to her ,as some of the woman mentioned above.Code:"She put her hand to the nail,and her right hand to the workman's hammer;and with the hammer she emote Sisera,she's mote of his head,when she had pierced and stricken through the temples"
Hannah ,had already weened her “firstborn” and must have with great attachment handed him over( completely) to Eli ,the high priest.
Although Mary ,greatly risked her reputation ;Deborah and Jael the wife of Heber ,risked there very lives.
Though I greatly respect the women of the Bible you mention, you are extraordinarily cavalier in your opinion about Mary’s obedience not being ‘costly’ to her.
Hannah’s son lived and died a prophet, reverenced by all. Jael and Deborah lived and died revered as well.
Mary saw her Son tortured and KILLED, and while we don’t know for certain, she probably spent the rest of her life after His resurrection living a life of hiding.
I can tell you aren’t a mother (perhaps not a father either) if you can think that Mary’s only risk was to her reputation as a teen, and that her seeing her Son crucified and dead wasn’t all that bad compared to a woman who saw her son cared for and honored (Hannah) and a woman who was accused of infidelity but TRIUMPHANTLY exonerated and going on to the highest office of her people. . .
You are really going to compare the fiat of a woman who consented to bear, and CARE FOR, the Son of God, and who saw Him put to death, as being ‘just another good woman’ and in fact, not nearly as praiseworthy as some others?
Wow.
If Catholics/and Orthdoxy didn’t make much do, there would be no Bible to speak of either so… A lack of respect for the Church which allowed you to even read about the great women of faith, one misses on out on** All aspects of the Good News**.Catholics by making much “a do” about the wonderful role Mary was made to play,I believe,miss out on all the other aspects ,the great women of faith ,have mightily shown us in regards to how we should live :unto God.
I agree with your assessment that there were many great women that were faithful to their God. What it boils down to for me is for what purpose was Mary made? That is the key to me.Mary was indeed blessed ,or in a state of happiness,in regards to her being that chosen vessel whereby the eternal Son of God ,would clothe himself ,“And being found in fashion as a man.”
But that beautiful obedience that Mary ,in humility ,was wonderfully,found in submission to,was not I believe unique to her person.
Ruth for instance is beautifully found in subjection to her(spiritual) mother(in law) Naomi .
She was also a chosen vessel ( or channel) by which the promised seed should come.
Hannah with total abandonment ,as you will know ,committed ,and gave the( at that time,the only) fruit of her womb,unto The Lord: the child Samuel
Deborah ,called to a different ,but none the less vital submission ( to God) unto the salvation of Israel.
Of which salvation,( Judges 5) another women is marked out ( by scripture) verse 24:
“Blessed above women shall Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite be,blessed shall she be above women in the tent”
And wherefore:this blessed state?
Verse25-26 “He asked water,and she gave him milk;she brought forth butter in a lordly dish.”
Indeed,it might be argued,that marvellous,though it was ,and an example for all to follow,Mary’s obedience was not as costly to her ,as some of the woman mentioned above.Code:"She put her hand to the nail,and her right hand to the workman's hammer;and with the hammer she emote Sisera,she's mote of his head,when she had pierced and stricken through the temples"
Hannah ,had already weened her “firstborn” and must have with great attachment handed him over( completely) to Eli ,the high priest.
Although Mary ,greatly risked her reputation ;Deborah and Jael the wife of Heber ,risked there very lives.
Catholics by making much “a do” about the wonderful role Mary was made to play,I believe,miss out on all the other aspects ,the great women of faith ,have mightily shown us in regards to how we should live :unto God.
If Catholics/and Orthdoxy didn’t make much do, there would be no Bible to speak of either so… A lack of respect for the Church which allowed you to even read about the great women of faith, one misses on out on** All aspects of the Good News**.
MJ