Fox's 'The Mick' Showcases Child Abuse

  • Thread starter Thread starter edwest2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Goes way beyond the normal prime time trash. They are just going to exploit these kids, ruining them in the process, and then discard them when the ratings tank. Even if you were to remove the children you would still be left with nothing but tasteless slapstick toilet humor.
 
This show was on while we were staying in a hotel a few months ago. It was absolutely vile. We turned it off after about 15 minutes.
 
We don’t watch “primetime network” television shows in our house. People at my job are obsessed with Modern Family, Blackish, and the Mick. I’ve tuned to all three and tuned out just as fast, they’re absolute slime.
 
. People at my job are obsessed with Modern Family, Blackish, and the Mick. I’ve tuned to all three and tuned out just as fast, they’re absolute slime.
Tastes vary, obviously, but I think some of the problem is people take these shows too seriously or expect them to be family friendly. They’re not intended for kids and they’re not meant to be taken as a serious model of morality.

If you don’t think a sitcom is funny, that’s fine,but don’t hold it up to a standard of “family friendly, faith reinforcing entertainment.” That’s not what it’s trying to be.

(I’ve never seen the Mick, so no opinion there.)
 
Tastes vary, obviously, but I think some of the problem is people take these shows too seriously or expect them to be family friendly. They’re not intended for kids and they’re not meant to be taken as a serious model of morality.

If you don’t think a sitcom is funny, that’s fine,but don’t hold it up to a standard of “family friendly, faith reinforcing entertainment.” That’s not what it’s trying to be.

(I’ve never seen the Mick, so no opinion there.)
This is a Catholic forum and Catholics should encourage one another regarding living out their faith.

Ed
 
This is a Catholic forum and Catholics should encourage one another regarding living out their faith.

Ed
Sure, but what threatens someone’s faith may not threaten someone else. A kid who is impressionable might need to be kept away from certain things that an adult can just laugh off and not take too seriously.
 
Sure, but what threatens someone’s faith may not threaten someone else. A kid who is impressionable might need to be kept away from certain things that an adult can just laugh off and not take too seriously.
If a Catholic is taught as a child that certain things are wrong, they are still wrong when they become an adult.

Ed
 
If a Catholic is taught as a child that certain things are wrong, they are still wrong when they become an adult.
Certain things are “wrong” based on the context. Is it “wrong” to show violence in a TV show? Well, it might be wrong to let a kid view it: it might scare them, they might not understand the distinction between TV and reality and start acting violently, etc. It’s not necessarily wrong for an adult to view it: presumably the adult understands that it’s just a TV show and he or she isn’t supposed to emulate it in real life.

Also, let’s bear in mind that just because a show portrays a character acting a certain way, it doesn’t mean it’s actually endorsing that behavior. Like, if a TV character is acting like an obnoxious, boorish jerk for comedic effect, that doesn’t mean the message of the show is “and you should act this way too.” Usually that character is the butt of the joke, anyway.

Part of this is just knowing yourself. Like, take Game of Thrones for example. Lot of sex and violence in that show. If a Catholic knows that he or she can view that and not be tempted into sin, great. Pop some popcorn and enjoy. On the other hand, someone else might know that they have more of a “hair trigger” so to speak, and seeing nudity portrayed in a drama might prompt them to look at pornography. That person should avoid it. It’s not about the show or movie itself being “bad”: it’s about whether it’s appropriate for the individual watching it.
 
That would be relativism. When I was a boy, I watched adults do things. I didn’t realize it then, but these good role models helped to lay a foundation for me as I grew into adulthood. Later, I realized their hospitality, non-use of profanity and general politeness, helped make me who I am today. Kids imitate parents as well. They notice things about their parents’ behavior even though they are not mature enough to see how it helps or hinders their adult life.

Ed
 
That would be relativism.
Ed
It’s not relativism: there’s still an absolute principle: people shouldn’t intentionally expose themselves to things that are going to undermine their faith or character. You just have to recognize that different people have different levels of resiliency or suggestibility. What might corrupt one person, another person can look at as just a silly TV show and enjoy it on that level, not taking it as a model for behavior.

Think of it this way. We’d probably agree with the general principle that people shouldn’t get completely hammered on alcohol. Indulging a bit is fine, but you need to still be in control of your faculties. But, putting that general principle into practice will be different for different people. A petite, short woman who weights 105 lbs probably can’t have more than a single glass of wine. A 6’6, 275 lbs linebacker could probably have five times that before he starts feeling the effects. That’s not relativism: there’s still an overarching principle that says that getting completely sloshed is wrong. It’s just that putting that principle into action is going to look a little bit different depending on the person.
 
I think part of the problem with this show is not only adult content, but underage cast members being actively involved in filming it.
 
Tastes vary, obviously, but I think some of the problem is people take these shows too seriously or expect them to be family friendly. They’re not intended for kids and they’re not meant to be taken as a serious model of morality.

If you don’t think a sitcom is funny, that’s fine,but don’t hold it up to a standard of “family friendly, faith reinforcing entertainment.” That’s not what it’s trying to be.

(I’ve never seen the Mick, so no opinion there.)
The problem is though, people are seeing these shows are some kind of morality model, Modern Family is a good example, the writers are trying to convey that having 2 homosexual men in a marriage as friends or in your family, as well as adopting and raising a child is fine, and not just fine, its great, their love should be celebrated and accepted like anyone elses.

The people who write these shows are not stupid, they are very good at taking hot button issues of the times and making them relate able to the average viewer, in hopes they will take on the same morals and eventually pass them on to their children and that is exactly whats happening.

You can see easy proof of this by watching shows from the past decades and some of the situations portrayed.You can also kind of gauge what kind of morals they are hoping for in the future by watching current tv, you can see some of the issues they are beginning to tackle, this is all methodical conditioning, if done right and done enough, it can sway millions of people.
 
The problem is though, people are seeing these shows are some kind of morality model, Modern Family is a good example, the writers are trying to convey that having 2 homosexual men in a marriage as friends or in your family, as well as adopting and raising a child is fine, and not just fine, its great, their love should be celebrated and accepted like anyone elses.

The people who write these shows are not stupid, they are very good at taking hot button issues of the times and making them relate able to the average viewer, in hopes they will take on the same morals and eventually pass them on to their children and that is exactly whats happening.

You can see easy proof of this by watching shows from the past decades and some of the situations portrayed.You can also kind of gauge what kind of morals they are hoping for in the future by watching current tv, you can see some of the issues they are beginning to tackle, this is all methodical conditioning, if done right and done enough, it can sway millions of people.
I agree with most of that, which is why I think that the proper response to most of these shows is “viewer discretion advised” not “pull them off the air.” People who aren’t particularly well formed in their faith and morals, or impressionable kids, need to exercise a lot more caution.

I think about a show like “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia”, which, incidentally also stars the woman from the Mick. It’s incredibly raunchy. The characters are all, objectively speaking, awful people. They get in horrible situations due to their own drunken stupidity basically every episode. There’s a recurring character who is a debauched ex-priest.

That said, some of the episodes are absolutely hilarious. And I, a 32 year old man, can watch it, laugh at it, and simultaneously be aware that A) it’s just a TV show and B) acting this way in real life would justifiably get you arrested. Would I let my kids watch it? Absolutely not. Do I think it should be available for adults who can bear in mind that it’s just a TV show? Sure.

I mean, virtually everything can corrupt someone’s values, if we’re not discerning in who we show it to. If we just make everything safe for the most impressionable, we’re basically all going to have to watch nothing but Teletubbies.

I think a lot of this is people start with the assumption that if something is on before 10 PM, it must be family friendly. It’s obviously not. We’re a long way from the Waltons. But just because something isn’t appropriate for kids doesn’t mean we need to take it away from adults as well.

As a final aside, you sort of need to have people behaving badly on TV, particularly in comedies. A comedy about a bunch of people acting responsibly and morally would…kinda dull.
 
I agree with most of that, which is why I think that the proper response to most of these shows is “viewer discretion advised” not “pull them off the air.” People who aren’t particularly well formed in their faith and morals, or impressionable kids, need to exercise a lot more caution.

I think about a show like “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia”, which, incidentally also stars the woman from the Mick. It’s incredibly raunchy. The characters are all, objectively speaking, awful people. They get in horrible situations due to their own drunken stupidity basically every episode. There’s a recurring character who is a debauched ex-priest.

That said, some of the episodes are absolutely hilarious. And I, a 32 year old man, can watch it, laugh at it, and simultaneously be aware that A) it’s just a TV show and B) acting this way in real life would justifiably get you arrested. Would I let my kids watch it? Absolutely not. Do I think it should be available for adults who can bear in mind that it’s just a TV show? Sure.

I mean, virtually everything can corrupt someone’s values, if we’re not discerning in who we show it to. If we just make everything safe for the most impressionable, we’re basically all going to have to watch nothing but Teletubbies.

I think a lot of this is people start with the assumption that if something is on before 10 PM, it must be family friendly. It’s obviously not. We’re a long way from the Waltons. But just because something isn’t appropriate for kids doesn’t mean we need to take it away from adults as well.

As a final aside, you sort of need to have people behaving badly on TV, particularly in comedies. A comedy about a bunch of people acting responsibly and morally would…kinda dull.
Yea, I see what you are saying.

Regarding the 10 pm versus primetime tv thing though, to be honest, I do not see a difference, I have watched very late night tv many times, and from what Ive seen they still conform to the same ‘standards’ as something on at 8pm, in that they are not allowed to show any more than they normally would, which is kind of strange imo.

I know this all goes back to the FCC though and I have wondered about them before, its interesting such an agency exists in these times imo, especially when morals and standards are pretty much out the window, but the FCC still insists on censoring certain things from television??? Im surprised there are not calls to do away with this altogether and why no one has questioned the FCCs directive, since they are basically a govt agency tasked with deciding what is moral and what should be censored or bleeped out on tv, whether its 8pm or 3am!
 
I know this all goes back to the FCC though and I have wondered about them before, its interesting such an agency exists in these times imo, especially when morals and standards are pretty much out the window, but the FCC still insists on censoring certain things from television??? Im surprised there are not calls to do away with this altogether and why no one has questioned the FCCs directive, since they are basically a govt agency tasked with deciding what is moral and what should be censored or bleeped out on tv, whether its 8pm or 3am!
Are you familiar with the Parents Television Council? It has a lot of members and a lot of media clout, I believe, and is trying to make TV healthier for kids.
“The mission of the PTC is to protect children and families from graphic sex, violence and profanity in the media, because of their proven long-term harmful effects. Our vision is to provide a safe and sound entertainment media environment for children and families across America.”

They do a lot of interesting research on the effects of TV sex and violence.

.
.
 
I agree with most of that, which is why I think that the proper response to most of these shows is “viewer discretion advised” not “pull them off the air.” People who aren’t particularly well formed in their faith and morals, or impressionable kids, need to exercise a lot more caution…
Those sound like people who have a hard time changing the channel. How would poorly formed adults, or impressionable kids, know to exercise caution?
I like St. Paul’s take on this: “So if what I eat causes another believer to sin, I will never eat meat again as long as I live–for I don’t want to cause another believer to stumble.”
As a final aside, you sort of need to have people behaving badly on TV, particularly in comedies. A comedy about a bunch of people acting responsibly and morally would…kinda dull.
I Love Lucy? All in the Family? You can be silly and extremely funny, or outrageously bigoted, you don’t need to be immoral or irresponsible to be humorous.

,
 
I Love Lucy? All in the Family? You can be silly and extremely funny, or outrageously bigoted, you don’t need to be immoral or irresponsible to be humorous.
You don’t think outrageous bigotry is immoral? Archie Bunker was a great comedic character, precisely because he was often rude and bigoted. Imagine if every episode had featured him having a respectful, polite conversation with his son-in-law. Kind of a snooze fest, no?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top