Notre Dame does have a lot going for it. It’s not as secular as Harvard and it’s a fine acedemic institution. I simply question its orthodoxy. Bad PR did not bring President Obama there. And how about this little coterie?
ucc.nd.edu/self-help/gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender-questioning-issues/
You are right, it was bad choices, not PR that brought Obama there.
The thing about Notre Dame is that it is a huge institution. There is good and bad in it. And, make no mistake, it is a battleground. But in this sense it is not unlike the Church as a whole (without, of course, the promise of Divine protection).
I don’t know anything about the “gender issues” thing you mentioned. I do see that it is in a long list of other difficulties a student might face. I imagine some students at other Catholic colleges might face similar difficulties, and are counseled by the school.
As far as I can tell, Notre Dame has a top notch theology program, and good teachers in it, and committed and orthodox students in theology for the large part.
That is a funny thing . . . I think the theology department is attracting devout Catholics. And it is somewhat self-filtering because you
really want to study theology if you go into it at Notre Dame because a) you got into a great academic school and b) it costs a lot of money and c) there are many other excellent academic programs to choose from. Those people who
really want to study theology often turn out, I’m guessing here, to be quite devout.
And what I mean about bad PR is that . . . usually I only see faithful Catholics talking about the bad parts of Notre Dame, not the good (like the Theology Dept). Other schools are the reverse of this: Good PR, where faithful Catholics talk about only the good parts of a school (say, Franciscan University or Ave Maria University) and ignore the bad parts.
I also try to remember that Notre Dame is a pretty hefty weight class, and that might need to be factored into our evaluation.
VC