Z
zaida
Guest
Im trying to find some information about what stance (if any) the Franciscans took during the whole Jesuit/Dominican argument over free will and grace (15-1600s)…Any thoughts?
Blessings!
Blessings!
I think the question was more directed to what their stance was before the Pope intervened. Not that I have an answer…The Pope ordered them all to stop arguing about it and said that if he caught anyone arguing about it again they would be excommunicated.
For the religious, the debate ended right there. There is no stance, one way or another, as far as they are concerned. Its over.
-Tim-
They themselves don’t care what their stance was so why should we? That’s my point.I think the question was more directed to what their stance was before the Pope intervened. Not that I have an answer…
All stuff I should have read and still have not found the time for.If you have suggestions for reading, I would be open to them.Thanks for your (name removed by moderator)ut, both of you!
I found a one piece of writing that indicated that the Franciscans didn’t take an official “side” - that some were more Jesuit in their understanding, some more Dominican, and some didn’t express a point of view. Also, interestingly, during the whole fiasco, at one point a few Franciscans were called in to help mediate.
While the Pope said no more arguing - which was a good call IMHO - there are certainly still people who write on these issues. Maritain, Father William Most, Father John Hardon…all interesting stuff…(well - all those great men are gone, may they rest in peace - but well into the 20th century they were exploring these issues)…
There is an exploding interest in Molinism in the Evangelical Christian community at the moment. And Thomas Flint is a Catholic Molinist who writes a lot on the issue.
Blessings!