Got this inquiry from my son who is a senior in high school.
Two men, who are identical twins, are separated at birth. Years later they are re-united and are surprised to learn that they married women who look similar, have the same number of kids, live in similar neighborhoods, both have circular benches around a tree in their front yards, etc.
Were their decisions genetically encoded? If so where does free will come into play?
Well, outside of a specific anecdote there is considerable evidence that points to genetic influence on personality traits. I’m not sure what you are asking, are you asking about the viability of twin studies, or the implications to the theological concept of free will?
As for the viability, twin studies are pretty fascinating. They take survey data from adoption cases and separate into three classes: Identical twins split at birth, fraternal twins split at birth, non-twins going to non-related households. Then they adjust for socio-economic factors and compare results.
The fascinating thing they find is that identical twins have a high correlation for sharing personality traits even when raises separately. Fraternal twins have higher rates of correlation than non-related adopted siblings. And in all cases (identical, fraternal, non-twin adoptee) the adopted children share more personality traits with their biological parents than they do with their adopted parents or siblings.
Now that is
personality traits, not beliefs. Research seems to show that
beliefs are mostly caused by your social groups (family, friends, community), but general attitudes and personality traits are heavily influenced by genetics.
So, for example, the adopted kids aren’t any more likely to follow the religion/political ideology of their biological parents than a random sample, but they are more likely to be alcoholics (or not), be calm (or angry) people in general, be obese (or skinny), have problems like schizophrenia (schizophrenia specifically is
very much shared between identical twins, but only when the placenta is shared), depression, levels of libido, etc.
So for the specific example your son brought up, well, I don’t think it means much. Genetics likely don’t influence whether or not a circular bench is aesthetically pleasing, and most identical twins separated at birth do not share identical life-styles. However, due to the genetic influence on attitudes and personalities they are more likely to end up in similar life-styles than a random control group.
As far as the theological implications, well, I don’t know. That depends on your view of choice. If you can divorce choice and emotions from attitudes in your conceptual model of behavior then free will is fine. If you think choice is influenced by attitudes, I’m not sure how you reconcile that. I’m sure someone who shares your religion can help you out.
No matter what you think about the theology though, Google, “twin studies” for some fascinating reading. Twin studies are some of the best information we have when we’re trying to sort through the nature vs. nurture discussion!