Free will stems from unconsciousness

  • Thread starter Thread starter glowingembers
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Free will stems from the divinely-granted grace of “knowing” which: is immanent and transcendent; and which is within and inside space-time and without space-time in the eternal “now.” One accident of this gracious gift is knowledge, the ability to construe and convey information. Even a baby can manifest this gift of knowing, and it is why the fallen nature of man induces an unbaptized baby to squall during the consecration, as any priest will tell you. United to God as His creation, this baby has the faculty of knowing, and conveys the knowledge by crying. Baptism will refine this unity with the Creator, as do all the sacraments.

Free will is manifest in God’s creation where there is choice. Adam and the Woman were debarred from the Paradise of Pleasure for violating the sacred formula for choice: Everything but this one thing. Where there is no option, where all has been chosen and there are no taboos, there is no choice, and no personhood as defined by free will.

We know what we experience and sense by divine revelation as immanent; and know more than what we experience and sense by divine inspiration as transcendent. Hence, Adam and the Woman could receive the information from Lucifer and react in sin; but knowing God, they further chose to reject Satan and embrace, in their knowledge, reconciliation with the Divine. Having the gift of knowing, there were consequences to the free-will choice. For Adam, having authority and power from God as steward of life and blessing, sin and death came into the world as corporate leader. On the level of personal responsibility, the ground would bring forth weeds as a consequence of this personal choice. The Woman would as a consequence of her personal choice bear the responsibility of giving birth in pain.

Satan is a Gnostic Materialist, the Father of Lies and Murder, first profanes knowing with profane knowledge as the will is weakened by doubt; and urges deadly choice. This assault on reason can be fed by peer pressure of the world, and urges of the flesh. Yet the transcendent touchstone within all, that faculty by which we know the voice of our Shepherd, grants discernment of the truth as a basis for choice. The corporate head of the household said rightly, speaking for his charges in saying, “As for me and my house, we chose life.” In transcendent wisdom (personified as female–one wonders if the Woman nudged him) Corporate Adam heard the voice of God and responded for all mankind and in humble love to bring reconciliation with God.

Going by the space-time continuum, Adam failed, and mankind should have been damned. The Lamb of God, slain before time began, who incarnated in the fullness of time, gave us new choice in conquering sin and death. Christus vincit. Christus regnat. Christus imperat.
 
Why do you subsume the “preference” under the headline of “reason” and not under the headline of “individual mind/soul - freedom”?

This would entirely resolve your difficulty.
Why should I subsume preference under freedom? If the agent has a preference for the weak impulse it means he is influenced to move toward the weak impulse. I thought that freedom would not influence the agent in any particular direction.
 
Once on jury duty a character was trying to get off of a horrible crime he had committed by claiming the ole …unbalanced nut case bit…as we chatted about it later in the jury room I asked a simple question to the rest…'Does this guy ,when he stops at a busy intersection,just does not stop but keeps a going across the street regardless of the traffic…or…or does he stop…look at the light…looks left and then right ,then makes a choice?..for if he does he knows what is right and wrong…ie Free Will. I recently gave a talk during Black history month and at the conclusion of my presentation I played two songs…‘In the Ghetto’ and ‘Patches’ both concern a black kid,who’s daddy died…the first one becomes a street punk and ends up shot and killed in the gutter…the second one listens to his momma and stays ,does his chores before and after school and at the end of the song reports on how he got a good job and purchased a nice house for her etc etc…The Ghetto that druggy Elvis pushed is a horrible song…of a loser who chose to not work and steal instead from honest folks.while the other “Patches” was a song that is for the ages.thus was quickly suppressed by the ruling class…weak pliable people can be easily put into chains.ahh yes…with a play on words of the last campaign…and the word ‘change’ now we see its spelled: Chains…we can believe in…
 
'Does this guy ,when he stops at a busy intersection,just does not stop but keeps a going across the street regardless of the traffic…or…or does he stop…look at the light…looks left and then right ,then makes a choice?..for if he does he knows what is right and wrong…
I don’t think that such a general conclusion follows from this example. What we can conclude though is that the guy knows that he might get run over by a car if he walks across when the light is red or when a car is approaching, and he doesn’t want to get run over. That’s all. What this has to do with free will is not clear to me because also a robot can be programmed to behave this way.
The Ghetto that druggy Elvis pushed is a horrible song…of a loser who chose to not work and steal instead from honest folks
Why would he choose it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top