Freemasonry Conspiracies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Bible states that people are not to have rituals. Freemasonry rituals constitute idol-worship.
Is there really a total forbidding of ritual? I know that there are prohibitions against pagan rituals, but it seems bizarre that there would be a total prohibition of any ritual despite the fact that rituals have played a major role among God’s people since the time of Israel. Today, things like the Mass, processions, and sacraments all have a ritualistic element to them.
 
Hi. The rituals of Israel find their fulfilment in the celebration of the Mass that we attend as Catholics.
 
I believe (I could be wrong) that historically the American Masons were more Christian than their European counterparts. George Washington expressed concern over European influence on American Lodges.

Regardless of how it appears or how the local group presents itself, Masonry is luciferian.
 
Yes, but they’re still rituals given by the same God who you claimed forbid rituals, so I’m still not sure why you claimed that the Bible forbids them.
 
The rituals carried out in worship to God were before the Scriptures were fulfilled; afterwards, no more rituals needed - we have the Mass.
 
Last edited:
You said:
The Bible states that people are not to have rituals.
I’m saying that that doesn’t seem consistent with the fact that God established rituals or the fact that His Church has continued the practice. The Mass is itself quite ritualistic when you consider all the goes on in it for a weekly Mass and even more for special ones like those of the Easter Triduum.
 
God didn’t care for rituals that were of pagan ‘gods’. Rituals to God, on the part of Israel, were acceptable because Israel was worshipping the true God, or more specifically, God. St. Paul, in the NT, said that the so-called gods of pagan religions were fallen angels. In Salvation History, any formal ritual outside that of the Catholic Mass, is tantamount to idol-worship.
 
Last edited:
You said:
40.png
friardchips:
The Bible states that people are not to have rituals.
I’m saying that that doesn’t seem consistent with the fact that God established rituals or the fact that His Church has continued the practice. The Mass is itself quite ritualistic when you consider all the goes on in it for a weekly Mass and even more for special ones like those of the Easter Triduum.
You raise a very pertinent point. I understand that the CC teaches that the first Mass was the Last Supper. I have been privy to observe Mass many times and am convinced there is much more ritual in a modern Mass than what is present in the Biblical account of the Last Supper.
 
The Mason I know called a Buddhist Temple a “church”. 😂 I was like no…that doesn’t fall under “church”
 
In Salvation History, any formal ritual outside that of the Catholic Mass, is tantamount to idol-worship.
OK, I thought you were speaking much more broadly. Thanks for clarifying.
You raise a very pertinent point. I understand that the CC teaches that the first Mass was the Last Supper. I have been privy to observe Mass many times and am convinced there is much more ritual in a modern Mass than what is present in the Biblical account of the Last Supper.
Technically, it was the first Mass, since the requirements of Mass, that the Eucharist was validly celebrated, did happen.

However, there are no laws against the Church changing the celebration surrounding the Eucharist, and the actual liturgy has changed at times throughout history. Even today one of the major debates internally among members of the Church is fueled by many traditionalists’ insistence that the current way of celebrating isn’t as good as the “old” way.

Generally, the actual rituals are designed to turn our attention to what is about to happen and what is going on. Some of it even makes perfect sense within the framework of the first Mass. For instance, the reading of the Word of God mirrors how the disciples talked with Jesus, the Word Incarnate. Some make sense in light of the life of the Christian, such as how crossing ourselves with holy water as we enter reminds us the baptism that we had to enter the Church. Others, frankly, were just unrelated stuff that someone found spiritual significance in, such as the washing of hands after the collection.

Still, what makes the Mass valid is the valid celebration of the Eucharist. But if you’re going to be eating the body of and drinking the blood of God, you should be doing so with proper reverence, and everything else helps prepare us for that.
 
In Europe, masonry is slightly different, they will accept anyone who professes a belief in a supreme being
 
I see no issue in the fraternal secrecy, even the Knights of Columbus have secrecy.
 
Where does it state not to have rituals? The Knights of Columbus have rituals
 
That is correct. On America one has to be Christian (afaik). The masons (at least in Mississippi) have no issue with the Catholic Church. Ironically, my time in the masons lead me back to the Church. I was agnostic (lied to get in) when I joined. The rituals and brotherhood got me back to Christ
 
That is correct. On America one has to be Christian (afaik). The masons (at least in Mississippi) have no issue with the Catholic Church. Ironically, my time in the masons lead me back to the Church. I was agnostic (lied to get in) when I joined. The rituals and brotherhood got me back to Christ
Freemasonry is evil and is looking for the downfall of the Catholic Church. It is completely incorrect that they have no issue with the Church.
The bottom line is that any Catholic who is a Mason, becomes a Mason or supports actively or passively the Masons puts themselves into a state of Mortal sin.
Freemasonry is INCOMPATIBLE with Catholicism.
 
Last edited:
It’s hardly as powerful as people think it is. It’s also dying off. In a few generations, it’s won’t exist.
Freemasonry as a visible organization may or may not die out, but that’s not what’s important. What’s important is that freemasonry is first and foremost a principle, i.e. that man is here to fashion the world after his own liking, regardless of what God’s intentions for the world and man were and are. And this, the freemasonic principle, is utterly rampant in the modern world. In fact, it’s no exaggeration to say that the modern world is based on this principle entirely. Modern education and upbringing are lengthy training courses in how to partipate in such a freemasonic system. In this sense – which is the important sense – freemasonry is not dying out. It is stronger than ever, and has more (unwitting) adherents than ever.
 
40.png
OKComputer:
It’s hardly as powerful as people think it is. It’s also dying off. In a few generations, it’s won’t exist.
Freemasonry as a visible organization may or may not die out, but that’s not what’s important. What’s important is that freemasonry is first and foremost a principle, i.e. that man is here to fashion the world after his own liking, regardless of what God’s intentions for the world and man were and are. And this, the freemasonic principle, is utterly rampant in the modern world. In fact, it’s no exaggeration to say that the modern world is based on this principle entirely. Modern education and upbringing are lengthy training courses in how to partipate in such a freemasonic system. In this sense – which is the important sense – freemasonry is not dying out. It is stronger than ever, and has more (unwitting) adherents than ever.
If I could give this post a hundred likes I would. It is the ultimate truth of the insidious influence of Freemasonry on Western civilisation.
 
A new code of canon law does make the previous canon law irrelevant, as far as what is licit, though it does nothing to change the moral issues addressed. In
The 1983 Code of Canon Law was promulgated in January 1983. In November 1983, with the approval of Pope John Paul II, Cardinal Ratzinger (as prefect of the CDF) stated, "The Church’s negative position on Masonic association… remains unaltered, since their principles have always been regarded as irreconcilable with the Church’s doctrine. Hence, joining them remains prohibited by the Church. Catholics enrolled in Masonic associations are involved in serious sin and may not approach Holy Communion.”

That seems pretty clear cut.

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top