C
Cari
Guest
Since the issue of nudity always being considered pornography is something entirely different from this thread, I will say this one last thing about it before I derail the OP.
Christy Beth, you originally wrote (before you started talking about Playboy and internet porn):
The OP never mentioned any facts about the pictures of his stepfather other than that they were nude. There was no context, no description, nothing (nor did there need to be). To not only assume that the pictures were pornographic, but to also extend this assumption to the stepfather’s fidelity in his marriage is slander.
Christy Beth, you originally wrote (before you started talking about Playboy and internet porn):
this is wrong. If nudity in general, and nudes in art/pictures in particular, are to be considered pornography in each and every instance, than I would imagine that anyone with even a sketchy knowledge of Catholic art would cry foul. I’ll mention the fact that the Sistine Chapel has at least one very famous nude and leave it at that.Nudity pictures should be considered pornography, and that has no place in the home. Especially when there are kids in the house.
The OP never mentioned any facts about the pictures of his stepfather other than that they were nude. There was no context, no description, nothing (nor did there need to be). To not only assume that the pictures were pornographic, but to also extend this assumption to the stepfather’s fidelity in his marriage is slander.