S
StubbleSpark
Guest
Implicit in your friend’s argument is that the human being is a sexual animal that needs to be “fed” sex (like an angry beast) to keep it passive.
Implicit in the Church’s rule of celibacy is that man has an intellect that can keep his base desires in check. That our passion for God MORE than satiates any physical craving.
Protestants (and others) like to point and laugh at celibacy. There is nothing laughable about it – it is noble to offer oneself up wholly as a holocaust to Christ. So we can only suspect that the reason they are laughing is because they are in awe.
Maybe if we were as defensive of our priests’ vows as we are of the daily sacrifices made by service members, people would be less likely to point and laugh.
Implicit in the Church’s rule of celibacy is that man has an intellect that can keep his base desires in check. That our passion for God MORE than satiates any physical craving.
Protestants (and others) like to point and laugh at celibacy. There is nothing laughable about it – it is noble to offer oneself up wholly as a holocaust to Christ. So we can only suspect that the reason they are laughing is because they are in awe.
Maybe if we were as defensive of our priests’ vows as we are of the daily sacrifices made by service members, people would be less likely to point and laugh.