Friends of a gay family member

  • Thread starter Thread starter SuzyRose45
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, you saying their relationship is wrong, despite whatever authority you believe to be true, is a personal condemnation on your part. YOU are rejecting it. Don;t act like you have no choice in the matter, because you do, so own your free will, and accept that you’re condemning it.
You can love a person without loving what they do. Your problem is that you qualify a human being as if they are “a gay person” and that’s it. No, that’s one part of a person. I don’t label a person a “gay person” or “this person” or “that person”. My son is who he is. I love him. I don’t love his behavior. He doesn’t love the fact that I’m a Christian and have a relationship with God, but he loves me anyway.

I still don’t see the problem.
 
You can love a person without loving what they do. Your problem is that you qualify a human being as if they are “a gay person” and that’s it. No, that’s one part of a person. I don’t label a person a “gay person” or “this person” or “that person”. My son is who he is. I love him. I don’t love his behavior. He doesn’t love the fact that I’m a Christian and have a relationship with God, but he loves me anyway.

I still don’t see the problem.
You’re not condemning a person for being a person, you’re condemning a person because of a part of them, that part being that they’re homosexual. You telling them it’s wrong, that a “part of who they are” is wrong, is condemning it. Also, i don’t “qualify” people as anything more than people, I’m just pointing out that what you’re doing DOES actually count as condemnation, regardless of whether or not you think it is.
 
You’re not condemning a person for being a person, you’re condemning a person because of a part of them, that part being that they’re homosexual. You telling them it’s wrong, that a “part of who they are” is wrong, is condemning it. Also, i don’t “qualify” people as anything more than people, I’m just pointing out that what you’re doing DOES actually count as condemnation, regardless of whether or not you think it is.
You just don’t get it. Even the Church believes homosexual behavior is “disordered”. It doesn’t condemn a chaste person who has SSA. And neither do I condemn my son for being attracted to men. But, I don’t agree with his lifestyle of engaging in that behavior.

Would it be wrong to disapprove and condemn criminal behavior? How about a son who races on the street and endangers other people? What about a son who uses drugs? You love your children, unconditionally. But, you cannot support the things they do sometimes.

You are the only person who has a problem with that. My son doesn’t. And like I said, I’m a Christian and my son doesn’t like that. But, it’s part of who I am. He loves me unconditionally anyway. We accept each other, regardless of who we are. We don’t have a problem with things. Why do you?
 
Is this becoming a ‘what’ a person does is ‘who’ they are… rather then the person is a ‘who’ that does ‘what’ is wrong?
 
Would it be wrong to disapprove and condemn criminal behavior? How about a son who races on the street and endangers other people? What about a son who uses drugs? You love your children, unconditionally. But, you cannot support the things they do sometimes.
Of course it’s not wrong, and congratulations for finally recognizing that you are condemning his lifestyle. That wasn’t hard, was it?
 
Of course it’s not wrong, and congratulations for finally recognizing that you are condemning his lifestyle. That wasn’t hard, was it?
Okay, smart guy.

I’ve never denied condemning his lifestyle. As a matter of fact, I’ve repeated it in every post 🤷 Your contention was that I was condemning HIM, which is not true.

It’s clear that you are pro-homosexual. Fine. But, don’t try to force me to accept your idea of condemnation. My son doesn’t. Why do you feel the need to? And by the way, he is married and I love the man he’s married to. I love him because he loves my son and treats him very well. He makes him very happy. At the end of the day, I love my son - no matter what.

I’ve never asked him to change, while he understands my feelings on the issue. I don’t expect him to tell me to be an atheist either. He’s an adult now and has to choose his own path in life, but whatever he chooses to do, I will still love him.

Wow, sounds like I’m an open-minded loving parent. Imagine that.
 
Okay, smart guy.

I’ve never denied condemning his lifestyle. As a matter of fact, I’ve repeated it in every post 🤷 Your contention was that I was condemning HIM, which is not true.

It’s clear that you are pro-homosexual. Fine. But, don’t try to force me to accept your idea of condemnation. My son doesn’t. Why do you feel the need to? And by the way, he is married and I love the man he’s married to. I love him because he loves my son and treats him very well. He makes him very happy. At the end of the day, I love my son - no matter what.

I’ve never asked him to change, while he understands my feelings on the issue. I don’t expect him to tell me to be an atheist either. He’s an adult now and has to choose his own path in life, but whatever he chooses to do, I will still love him.

Wow, sounds like I’m an open-minded loving parent. Imagine that.
hmmm…
I don’t see it that way. It’s very simple. The relationship is wrong. There is no personal condemnation as far as judging the person, but on the relationship. Difference between behavior and person. Easy.
Your problem is that you qualify a human being as if they are “a gay person” and that’s it. No, that’s one part of a person. I don’t label a person a “gay person” or “this person” or “that person”. My son is who he is.
Your son IS a homosexual, right? And homosexuality is just plain wrong? you condemned him, then said you didnt condemn him, just the act, and then you just deny that you denied condemning him. It’s not “my idea” of condemnation, it’s what condemnation IS. I’m happy that you raised a son who’s willing to overlook the fact that you can’t accept him, but will love you anyway. Not many people can forge that special kind of relationship.
 
Quite profound :rolleyes:
Your son IS a homosexual, right? And homosexuality is just plain wrong? you condemned him, then said you didnt condemn him, just the act, and then you just deny that you denied condemning him. It’s not “my idea” of condemnation, it’s what condemnation IS. I’m happy that you raised a son who’s willing to overlook the fact that you can’t accept him, but will love you anyway. Not many people can forge that special kind of relationship.
If you want to use labels, yes he is. If you want to call him my son who happens to be homosexual, that is more accurate. The difference is that you only see a person as “homosexual” or “heterosexual” or “black” or “white”. That’s how you seem to define a person. I don’t agree with that. It’s useful for identification, but not when you are describing what a person is by nature. That’s why you can’t see the difference in condemning behavior versus condemning people.

I don’t just see a “black” person as defining who they are. There’s far more characteristics to define a person. I only see “people”, who happen to be black, or white or heterosexual or homosexual. God doesn’t look at people that way and neither do I.

I adopted my son. I adopted him regardless of his past and regardless of what he chose to do or how to live. That’s what love is. I chose him, not because he was born to me, but because I accepted him as a boy who needed a father and I chose to love him, no matter what, whether he chose men or women, drugs or not, crime or not. And he adopted me as his father, as a Christian, and a person who chose to love him. You can’t get much more accepting than that. He adopted my wife and I as his parents who are relatively normal people who are heterosexual.

You are out of your league in discussing this with me.
 
I’m a little dense this morning. Can you explain this? 🙂

Thanks.
The ‘who’ one is, is a human being, one of God’s Children… and sometimes, one of our children too.

The ‘what’ one does, since there are so many paths to choose from, some morally right, some not; some socially correct, some not; some religious right, some not; etc… any of these paths does not change the basic ‘who’ one is… only the ‘what’ they do.

Remember the old song, If I were a carpenter… would you marry me anyway?

This adds a dimension to, is one marring the ‘who’ or the ‘what’? And how we look at the gay person in a union… did they become a union of the ‘who’ or the ‘what’?

It is this distinction that causes misconceptions. Is a gay an act, or actually who the person is, rather then what they are?
 
The ‘who’ one is, is a human being, one of God’s Children… and sometimes, one of our children too.

The ‘what’ one does, since there are so many paths to choose from, some morally right, some not; some socially correct, some not; some religious right, some not; etc… any of these paths does not change the basic ‘who’ one is… only the ‘what’ they do.

Remember the old song, If I were a carpenter… would you marry me anyway?

This adds a dimension to, is one marring the ‘who’ or the ‘what’? And how we look at the gay person in a union… did they become a union of the ‘who’ or the ‘what’?

It is this distinction that causes misconceptions. Is a gay an act, or actually who the person is, rather then what they are?
Thanks for the explanation. I’ve always told my children that no matter what they do or how they live their life - criminal, immoral or otherwise - I would always love them and be there for them. If they rob a bank I expect them to have to answer for that decision.

Will I visit them in prison? Yes. Will I still love them? Yes. Will I tell the judge their good people who shouldn’t have to own up to what they do? No. I tell them what I believe is right and wrong, according to the Bible and my own experiences and it’s up to them to follow or not follow.

Does the fact that they robbed a bank make them a robber or does it make them a person who screwed up and made a bad decision by robbing a bank? I’d say it’s the latter. And I believe that’s what the Church teaches (although I’m not Catholic) and I believe that’s how God views them - as his children who do immoral things or criminal things. Nothing can separate us from the love of God.
 
Quite profound :rolleyes:

If you want to use labels, yes he is. If you want to call him my son who happens to be homosexual, that is more accurate. The difference is that you only see a person as “homosexual” or “heterosexual” or “black” or “white”. That’s how you seem to define a person. I don’t agree with that. It’s useful for identification, but not when you are describing what a person is by nature. That’s why you can’t see the difference in condemning behavior versus condemning people.

I don’t just see a “black” person as defining who they are. There’s far more characteristics to define a person. I only see “people”, who happen to be black, or white or heterosexual or homosexual. God doesn’t look at people that way and neither do I.

I adopted my son. I adopted him regardless of his past and regardless of what he chose to do or how to live. That’s what love is. I chose him, not because he was born to me, but because I accepted him as a boy who needed a father and I chose to love him, no matter what, whether he chose men or women, drugs or not, crime or not. And he adopted me as his father, as a Christian, and a person who chose to love him. You can’t get much more accepting than that. He adopted my wife and I as his parents who are relatively normal people who are heterosexual.

You are out of your league in discussing this with me.
As an adopted homosexual myself, I think you’re mistaken.
I’m assuming he must have been well into his teens when you adopted him, right?
 
As an adopted homosexual myself, I think you’re mistaken.
I’m assuming he must have been well into his teens when you adopted him, right?
Yes, he was 16 and? The problem I have and it seems like you do too, is that we assume that all parents and homosexual children have the same situations and are supposed to relate the same way. For me and him it’s rather simple. I guess for others it is not.

And by the way - continuing with the Christian analogy - I was born a Christian and choose to live that way. Whether or not he was born that way or not, he still has a choice - a choice he has struggled with.

Is being homosexual all that you characterize yourself as? My son doesn’t. When asked about his sexuality, he says he’s a homosexual.
 
Mystic, I like your mentality/spirituality (even though you are not Catholic). Come to think about it, I have a lot of non-Catholic friends… Ah, is one’s religion a ‘who’ or a ‘what’?
 
Mystic: With your further explanation I see where you are coming from, and I now see that you have great understanding and compassion. Forgive me for interpreting your words in a way they were not intended. You just seemed to come off a little harsh at first, that’s all. :]
 
Yes, he was 16 and? The problem I have and it seems like you do too, is that we assume that all parents and homosexual children have the same situations and are supposed to relate the same way. For me and him it’s rather simple. I guess for others it is not.
No, I don’t have that problem, really. I know some friends whose parents would beat them for being gay, myself, I’m fortunate that my father would accept anything i throw at him, so long as it didn’t hurt anyone. That said, I’m aware that the gay thing is foreign to him, so i don’t (and I’m not a flamer, or super active in the lifestyle) throw it in his face, but in the times that i need to talk to him about it, he’s there for me, no questions asked. The only reason i assumed your kid was older when you adopted him, was because you said you did it regardless of his past. I was adopted from birth, you learn to pick up on things like that, no “and” about it.
 
Mystic: With your further explanation I see where you are coming from, and I now see that you have great understanding and compassion. Forgive me for interpreting your words in a way they were not intended. You just seemed to come off a little harsh at first, that’s all. :]
I’m sorry if it seemed harsh. Sometimes I can word things differently. I was trying to sum it up in short, concise statements and it probably did seem harsh.

Well, I don’t know I have great understanding. My understanding has grown over time. My Heavenly Father loves me despite my faults or behavior and I try to love my children the same way. God gave me principles to live by that I use to define my faith. I can’t deny what I believe Scripture says about homosexual behavior. But, Scripture also tells me that I need to love people no matter what.
 
Is being homosexual all that you characterize yourself as? My son doesn’t. When asked about his sexuality, he says he’s a homosexual.
must have edited after i quoted you. In regards to your question, I have one for you.
Are you eye, or tooth, or nail?
I’m not, but I carry them all within me, and they do indeed make up who I am. Cut off my finger and it changes what I am. Same for the “labels” as you call them.
 
No, I don’t have that problem, really. I know some friends whose parents would beat them for being gay, myself, I’m fortunate that my father would accept anything i throw at him, so long as it didn’t hurt anyone. That said, I’m aware that the gay thing is foreign to him, so i don’t (and I’m not a flamer, or super active in the lifestyle) throw it in his face, but in the times that i need to talk to him about it, he’s there for me, no questions asked. The only reason i assumed your kid was older when you adopted him, was because you said you did it regardless of his past. I was adopted from birth, you learn to pick up on things like that, no “and” about it.
Well, obviously I wouldn’t beat my son. Yes, being gay is a bit foreign to me. But, like you, he doesn’t throw it in my face either. My son shares with me his feelings, more than even some of my other children.

He’s been beaten, stabbed and a host of other things because he’s a person who is gay. We talk about that. And he’ll tell me he doesn’t want to be gay if that’s what happens. You know what I tell him? Those people are wrong and he doesn’t need to let those kind of people label him. I hate, absolutely hate labels.

I didn’t tell him to turn straight. I didn’t tell him he deserved it. He even tried to change but just found that it wasn’t for him. I want him to choose how he is going to live, not let me or someone else tell him how to live. I don’t tell him how to live. And I don’t expect him to tell me. He knows me well enough and I know him well enough to know where we stand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top