Thanks for the (name removed by moderator)ut, everyone.
A few further details in reply to the comments:
The woman (let’s call her Sarah) does not live in the priest’s parish. She is asking advice from others rather than the priest himself because she feels that to discuss it with him would be to open the door to the kind of conversation that she thinks it would be better not to have. Once that topic has been put “on the table” it can’t be unsaid. Sarah thinks (and those of us with whom she has discussed it agree) that it would be much wiser to stick to safer topics of conversation.
She is a protestant (as am I) without any RC friends that she can ask. She understands that secrecy of any kind would be unwise, and is accountable to a few other women within our church, but wanted further clarification about what exactly the boundaries are. The first time we discussed it together, we agreed that a good way for her to think about it would be to treat him as she treats friends who are married men.
However, in practice Sarah has found that it is not quite the same. In our group of friends it is generally considered that the best way to make certain that things stay “on the right side of the line” with a married male friend is to involve the wife in the friendship - either in person, if this is applicable, or by referring to her positively in the course of conversations with him if she’s not going to be present (for example, if it is a work friendship and the wife doesn’t work at the same place). However, it is difficult to see how this can be applied in the case of the priest.
Furthermore, the story of the friendship between Pope John Paul II and Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, and in particular the things that he wrote to her about his feelings concerning the devotional scapular, have further confused us. None of us would allow a married man to write to us in the kind of terms he used when writing to her about it. So while we all continue to feel that it is important that “the line” should not be crossed, we none of us feel we understand exactly where “the line” is by RC standards. (I have particularly sensitive “radar” for nuances that might indicate the beginning of an improper direction for a friendship, having experienced the double betrayal of my husband’s affair with my then best friend.)
A few years ago when I was at a bit of a loss for how to “be there” for a divorced friend of mine who is RC, I posted a question about it on this website (referring to her as Jane and changing some details for extra anonymity), and received a great deal of (name removed by moderator)ut that meant I could support her from a position of insight rather than ignorance, for which was I very grateful, so I thought I would ask all you helpful people for (name removed by moderator)ut again.
I did also ask Jane what she thought of the “friendship with a priest” situation - she’s the only RC friend I have to ask. Her advice was for Sarah not to risk hurting the priest by offering him a closer connection in the present than she would feel able to continue in the future were she to cease to be single. This advice was well received, and is now part of what Sarah is guarding against.
Thank you again for all your (name removed by moderator)ut.