FSSP and SSPX

  • Thread starter Thread starter paul11b
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Monica4316 said:
Maybe the SSPX don’t feel comfortable being with the Vatican as long as the Novus Ordo (etc) is in the Church… and the FSSP want to be in communion with the Pope
Click to expand...
Where have you guys been? You know about the Sept. 14 document, the meetings? Fellay’s defiant statement? This has been all over the Catholic blogosphere for a week.

You are all ridiculing me (unjustly I might add since YOU started the attacks) for being “wrong” and I have already given you the answer to this very question.

It is the same “Vatican II” issues that have dragged this down before. Do you want me to spell them out? I thought I was conversing with folks up on the issue, but now I see maybe when I mentioned about the **Prelature **and the famous Vatican 2 clause on ecumenism, and the unification with the Jews, it just went over your heads?

I give up. Google the above words if CAF doesn’t have enough well-informed people for you. Look at the GOOD articles from the past week.

Sorry you have found my contribution, although accurate, not to your liking. So I will shut up and let you, the experts, explain where I am off base in my interpretation? Go ahead, tell me, I am quite well-informed and I’m dying to know why I’m wrong.

There is no aspect of this situation I cannot discuss in depth, but I was trying to keep it light and hit key points here, due to obvious wide degrees of knowledge on this topic.
 
Margie9 said:
Sorry you have found my contribution, although accurate, not to your liking. So I will shut up and let you, the experts, explain where I am off base in my interpretation? Go ahead, tell me, I am quite well-informed and I’m dying to know why I’m wrong.
.
Click to expand...
Let’s start with the New Covenant. How do you propose we are unified with anyone who rejects it and Jesus Christ as the Son of God the Father ?
 
Margie9 said:
Where have you guys been? You know about the Sept. 14 document, the meetings? Fellay’s defiant statement? This has been all over the Catholic blogosphere for a week.

It is the same “Vatican II” issues that have dragged this down before. Do you want me to spell them out? I thought I was conversing with folks up on the issue, but now I see maybe when I mentioned about the **Prelature **and the famous Vatican 2 clause on ecumenism, and the unification with the Jews, it just went over your heads?
Click to expand...
If you do a search, you will find there are current threads on this topic, so we have been reading as much as you have.
I give up. Google the above words if CAF doesn’t have enough well-informed people for you. Look at the GOOD articles from the past week.
Click to expand...
Sorry you have found my contribution, although accurate, not to your liking. So I will shut up and let you, the experts, explain where I am off base in my interpretation? Go ahead, tell me, I am quite well-informed and I’m dying to know why I’m wrong.
Click to expand...
There is no aspect of this situation I cannot discuss in depth, but I was trying to keep it light and hit key points here, due to obvious wide degrees of knowledge on this topic.
Click to expand...
Frankly all of these SSPX threads get quite tiresome, although I must admit that your brash and patronizing manner is decent bait. However, it doesn’t look like many are falling for it. We’re just tired.
 
TrueLight said:
If you do a search, you will find there are current threads on this topic, so we have been reading as much as you have.

Frankly all of these SSPX threads get quite tiresome, although I must admit that your brash and patronizing manner is decent bait. However, it doesn’t look like many are falling for it. We’re just tired.
Click to expand...
All I’ll say is… God bless the Society of Saint Pius X.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top