Fundraising in Homily

  • Thread starter Thread starter MB065
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you read the homilies of St. John Chrysostom, he exhorts the people to give alms a lot. He wished he didn’t have to either though. Of course, he was also quite compelling when he did it. I don’t think anyone minded hearing it. Perhaps our contemprary priests should just read his homilies.
 
Like I said, I’m fine with fundraising and understand the need, but in homily time seems inappropriate and potentially damaging
First, I’m truly sorry for your situation and what your father is going though. God willing, he will be able to attend mass at least one more time. Praying for your intentions now.

Just curious… when would be a proper time, if not the homily/sermon? The clergy know you can’t do it after / before / outside of mass because most people will be gone / not attend.
 
Last edited:
It would never occur to me to sit in judgment on what my bishop has approved for me to hear at Mass, nor to bring a Kindle as some kind of alternate reality.
That’s fine, you do you. I’m not sitting in judgment. And if you want to call St. Athanasius or one of the other Fathers an “alternate reality,” that’s up to you.

D
 
There are several things at play here. Having been very involved in parish finances in the past, I can tell you there is simply no other time to make financial appeals except during the homily. That is unfortunate, but it is a fact. After communion, during announcements, people do not want to sit through more than a few sentences. We tried before mass, and the simple fact is half the church fills up the last couple of minutes before Church starts, so you miss a lot of people.
I can further tell you that every priest I have ever met, hates to do it, does it reluctantly, and as rarely as possible. In this particular case, if it was a visiting priest, I assume he was travelling to various parishes to specifically raise funds for his apostolate, and the pastor allowed him to do so.
Fair enough.
Now, a few words about the Gospel and readings should be given, a short homoly if you will, prior to the fundraising appeal, IMO.
Okay.

But, I have also seen homilies where the priest did not even comment on any of the readings, but just said, “And now we’re going to hear from Sister Mary of the XYZ Mission” and then the person from the mission spoke.
OTOH, I can certainly make the argument there is nothing wrong with financial appeals during the homily. Material support of the Church, based on each of our ability, is precept of the Church. Not following a precept of the Church is a objectively a mortal sin. So it does not hurt any of us to be occasionally reminded that what we are obligated to do. On top of that, every good Catholic should realize that the homily is by no means the focal point of the mass, indeed it is quite low on the priority list. So low, it can be omitted. So lets keep things in perspective, we need to be reminded of our obligations. And we don’t go to mass to hear a great homily.
See, I think the homily is important.

Not the most important part of the Mass, but important nevertheless.

Just as, as you say, we may need someone to remind us of our obligation to give to our Church and the missions, we may also need someone to remind us how the lessons in today’s readings (e.g., “help the poor,” “don’t get caught up in material things,” “love your enemies”) might apply to Christians in our culture today.
 
Okay.

But, I have also seen homilies where the priest did not even comment on any of the readings, but just said, “And now we’re going to hear from Sister Mary of the XYZ Mission” and then the person from the mission spoke.
Yes, I don’t really like that also. That is just omitting the homily. But, to my knowledge, it is a legitimate option for the priest to do this. I have seen it also, but it really doesn’t happen very often at all.
See, I think the homily is important.

Not the most important part of the Mass, but important nevertheless.

Just as, as you say, we may need someone to remind us of our obligation to give to our Church and the missions, we may also need someone to remind us how the lessons in today’s readings (e.g., “help the poor,” “don’t get caught up in material things,” “love your enemies”) might apply to Christians in our culture today.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying the homily is not important. All parts of the mass are important. But there is still levels of importance, and I can easily think of hald a dozen things in the mass more important than the homily.
 
Last edited:
Our pastor has a slightly awkward way about him, and he harangues us quite often about giving more. I suspect it has the opposite effect of what he is trying to achieve. The EF parish I occasionally attend makes it a point in most every bulletin to say that the parish budget is available for anyone to see at anytime, and I’ve never heard the EF pastor harangue us for money. Of course the EF parish doesn’t have a school to run.
 
Last edited:
I am very sorry that this happened to your father.

We have a few pastors in our area who think that the homily is the correct time to harangue the congregation about financial support. One is infamous for their “money masses”. I’ve been to them and absolutely despised every minute. I felt so uncomfortable, like I was nothing but a chequebook (I was also struggling financially at the time, and being lectured about how I should give when I had next to nothing was hard on the head).

By contrast, we have a lovely, subtle, charming pastor who inspires support from the parish for large projects without the need to monopolize the homily talking about money. There might be a word or two about the most recent initiative at the beginning or end of a homily, or during the announcements, but the homily is about the readings. The parish responds well and we can usually complete projects quickly without any concerns of funding.

So, I don’t agree that this is necessary and I am sorry it spoiled your father’s experience. Perhaps you could look around for a daily Mass he could attend and even contact the priest ahead of time to let the priest now that it will be a special experience for your father.
 
This is not a reply to any specific post here.

First, I am sorry for your dad’s experience. It is a shame that the church places less emphasis on the spiritual needs of the faithful.
Secondly, the debate here so far is about the institutional church and not the faithful. Nearly every one posting explains how we need to support the church, how the church is not perfect and the services are bad, how we need to put up with things, etc. Not one person mentioned the spiritual needs of the father, or indeed all the faithful.
Thirdly and perhaps the best/worst story depending on viewpoint. An example of how the church keeps asking for more and more money: A church here began a building campaing asking parishoners to pony up $7,000,000 to expand the meeting spaces, teaching facilities and offices. Not the sanctuary, which is small for the size of the congregation and dated. To “encourage” the faithful, the pastor wrote (or someone wrote for him) a special prayer where the faithful were pleading with God to persuade them to give money. (no, this is not a joke) This was truly outragous and someone put a stop to it after two or three weeks.

Maybe if the priests concentrated more on the mission they were assigned and not the business of raising more and more funds, the parishoners would be more likely to give?
 
I believe I’ve seen at least one study that shows the parishioners at EF parishes are statistically more likely to donate more per capita… as well as have 6 kids rather than just over 2, attend every sunday, etc.
 
I am in a parish that has a big church bldg. and it costs
money to keep up!! So taking up a special collection for
the oil and needs of the bldg. are taken every Sunday.
I see NO problem for that, but to harp on it by the Bishop
seems a bit much… It might be that I don’t know the parish
nor the financial difficulties that the Diocese is undergoing.
 
Secondly, the debate here so far is about the institutional church and not the faithful. Nearly every one posting explains how we need to support the church, how the church is not perfect and the services are bad, how we need to put up with things, etc. Not one person mentioned the spiritual needs of the father, or indeed all the faithful.
The pastor and priest had no means of knowing the situation, however tragic, of one particular attendee. As bad as I feel for the OP and his dad, they attended mass, you do that primarily for one spiritual need. To take part in the sacrifice of the mass and to receive our Lord. By all indications, this spiritual need was met.
To “encourage” the faithful, the pastor wrote (or someone wrote for him) a special prayer where the faithful were pleading with God to persuade them to give money
Nothing wrong with this at all. We have a beautiful special prayer for our parish which includes sentence such as this. We said it all through our capital campaign and we continue to say it after every mass. I think most people would be upset if it was stopped.
 
Surely you and I have a very different idea of the role of the church. I don’t recall anyone in the bible telling Peter that he is being put in charge of the fund raising campaign.
 
??? The fact that I understand the Church requires financial and material resources means I lack an understanding of the Church’s role? Likely the opposite.

As to Peter, read Act chapter 5. It does seem like he was involved in fundraising to me.
 
If the church doesn’t have enough funding, what happens?
 
The Apostles did provide instructions to the early Christians about offerings:

I Corinthians chapter 16:

The Collection.*

Now in regard to the collection for the holy ones, you also should do as I ordered the churches of Galatia.

On the first day of the week each of you should set aside and save whatever one can afford, so that collections will not be going on when I come.
 
Our lives have become so commercialized that even when it comes to religion and the church, we can only understand it in terms of money.
 
I’m sure if people would give/donate to the church without the pastor having to ask, the pastor would be thrilled.

But, it doesn’t happen. Many people simply won’t give unless they are asked.
Still I have to agree that asking for money in the homily is of poor taste. Our archdiocese does it and I have to agree that they’re not being considerate of the potential for it to be someone’s last mass, thus it’s only appropriate in the announcements or when there’s a reading on generosity.

We need to teach people to be generous because it’s wise to be generous. Churches do need money, but decorum is very important. I think it’s so important to have a homily that matches the readings because there’s a purpose for those readings. It’s more important that three people hear a proper homily (even a poorly constructed one) for their last mass than it is for 10,000 people to be more generous because they heard the message.
 
Last edited:
“What could be MORE important than supporting one’s Church and Diocese.”

Maybe providing spiritual guidance to your flock, the people in the pew, right in front of you? Maybe being aware that there is man in the pew who is dying soon?
“The Church” are the faithful. Who is taking care of the flock?
 
Giving is a spiritual thing. Giving is one of the very basic precepts of the Church, it is that important.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top