T
Texas_Roofer
Guest
Let me start by saying I once held a similar position
hope that helps
This is the problem, this contradicts Natural [Moral] Law. Marriage is not a contract, not a contract at all. Men and Women marry all times and all places, with and without [legal] authority. Others cannot, they do alternate things and then attempt to achieve approval by calling what they do “marriage” however it is not marriage it cannot be marriage. Marriage is guy and girl thing when those two accept and need each other, the guy/girl pair is made to fit, while others simply are not made to fitI am a Catholic. And I believe that Gay Marriage, as a civil institution, should be legal in the United States of America.
It is abundantly clear that secular society has a view of marriage that is vastly different than the Church. God is not brought into many marriages. People marry and divorce at will. People carry infidelity in their minds and bodies.
Marriage, as a civil institution, is a contract. It is no different than a contract between a labor union and employer. In other words, it often holds absolutely no spiritual value. God is rarely present. God is not required to be present.
This is an interesting subject “judge verses nature” nature will win though the judge will claim victoryIn this context, it is discriminatory to not allow homosexuals to take part in this institution.
I support the Churches teaching on homosexuality. Even more so, I support the Churches teaching on marriage.
“right” I am not following you here what “right” is the church trying to deny?However, if same sex couples want to have a civil marriage that is their right. The Church should not concern itself.
Which is to say these are not mariages at all, marriages are not “broken at any time for any reason” and the children know the difference. Please read some statistics on the link between single parenting and crime, also read the statistics of monogamy with in same sex relationshipsI definitely see some of the arguments that were made in this thread against same sex marriage.
However, none of them relate to or should be binding in a civil marriage. One poster had questioned why I brought up divorce in the argument. It was not to posit the idea that divorce was in any way acceptable. Rather, this is the nature of civil marriage. It is a contract between two mutually consenting adults. It can be broken at any time and for. any reason. I can see know reason why civil society should not grant this contract to same sex couples the same as opposite sex couples.
I think the priest told you correctly, however you misunderstood. The church will only marry you if it is likely you are attempting a real marriage, while the civil authority requires $2Christian marriage and civil marriage are two vastly different things. I remember when my wife and I were sitting down and discussing getting married with our priest he told us just that. He told us that the civil part of marriage can be broken at will. But in the Church it is a blessed sacrament that can not be broken. Very different.
hope that helps