"Gay 'marriage' doesnt hurt society"

[edwest2]

if it is such an “abuse” and you want to prohibit gay couples of both gender to raise children what are your plans on biological children of gay couples?

You do understand that homosexuality doesnt mean infertile. You do understand that there are many same-sex families raising their children.

Lesbian couples are actually two times more productive in terms of child bearing than MF couple.

metro.co.uk/2011/03/08/quintuplets-born-to-lesbian-couple-melissa-keevers-and-rosemary-nolan-643239/

So, are you going to take these children away?Perhaps put them into some god fearing families? Are you going to deny the children of gay atheists social protection given by
marital status just because YOU dont like the idea(as it has anything to do with you) hiding behind the talk “protect children, protect family” whereas in reality its you lot who instill hate, stigmatize, demonize, these families, that extremely negatively affect children who see how their parents are treated?

that’s entirely your problem. what does it have to do with people who do not share believes of your cult?

There were numerous studies that proved there is nothing wrong with same sex parenting. All professional psychological organization are in favor. And the latest disgrace of a study done by right wing christian Ferguson or whatever his name was as it turned out had nothing at all to do wih same-sex stable families.nothing.

No, im really curious on the subject of prohibiting adoption and all that “abuse” talk. because following that logic we would have to prohibit gay couple to have kids at all. And if they are allowed to have kids then there is no logical basis for adoption prohibition.

As for me i consider religion is a grave abuse of children and propaganda of religion must be prohibited to all children until the age of 18.
How do you like that notion?

Your post is rude, and amounts to a series of accusations. If you don’t like religious people, why post here? Your post has been reported as rude and it is abusive.

Ed

 

[Faithdancer]

To kelvinf,

You are quite right. Men who have sex with boys are being repackaged as “minor-attracted persons” here.

Warning: The following material is not suitable for children.

americansfortruth.com/2011/08/25/firsthand-report-on-b4u-act-conference-for-minor-attracted-persons-aims-at-normalizing-pedophilia/

Peace,
Ed

I glanced through the site, Ed, and it is pretty shocking. I notice that these “minor-attracted persons” use similar arguments to those we hear from other militants, whom the leaders and presenters at this “conference” apparently hope to emulate. I hope they continue to link themselves with the other militants so that sooner or later the majority of the American public will wake up and see what a small minority is foisting upon us in the name of “civil rights.”

 

[InSearchofGrace]

Your post is rude, and amounts to a series of accusations. If you don’t like religious people, why post here? Your post has been reported as rude and it is abusive.

Ed

Indeed. I was about to post in reply and just finished it, so here it is.

…

Hereby noted the first posting of a new member upthread defending lesbian couple parenting.

There is this book “My Daddy’s Name is Donor: A New Study of Young Adults Conceived Through Sperm Donation,” by Elizabeth Marquardt, Norval Glenn and Karen Clark, 2010. It discusses a study of young people from lesbian couple families that has a recurring theme of “looking for my father everywhere.” Over one third of the young people surveyed agreed “it is wrong to conceive a fatherless child,” and said that when they see friends with biological moms and dads they feel sad. Nearly half said, “My sperm donor is half of who I am.”

What can we take away from what goes on in the minds of these young people? Children, no matter how they are conceived or into what type of family environment they are born or adopted — desire to know where they came from, who they look like, where they get certain characteristics, and most importantly, to know and be known by their own mother and father.

In fact, as anyone can check, there have been services advertised on the internet to help clients most of whom are lesbian pairs looking for a sperm donor, to meet certain criteria, of course. More recently another or related industry became necessary, a business opportunity to meet a need, fee for service, on the result side. There is at least one company with a site name, SearchingForMySpermDonor.org. This is consistent with a generation of young people who were subjects of the research of Marquardt et al with a longing for connection to their paternal progenitor, a longing for a sense of normalcy. Sad, no? Was this predictable? You betcha. One could question if people who subscribe to nothing beyond materialism or physical naturalism, which seem to attract atheists and agnostics, reflect on dilemmas arising from cavalier pursuits, e.g., SS’M’ and same sex parenting. Another poster strongly asserted the mutual exclusiveness of the concepts of marriage with sex / parenting, as if keeping them separate is the ideal.

Adult interests over the right of a child to a mother and a father.

Manifestation of abuse is not necessarily physical or immediate, not readily observable in just a few years.

 

[Faithdancer]

Your post is rude, and amounts to a series of accusations. If you don’t like religious people, why post here? Your post has been reported as rude and it is abusive.

Ed

Ed, I’m also going to report all posts that mock Christianity and Sacred Scripture.