M
1989: Denmark becomes the first country to grant same-sex partners the same rights as married couples. Church weddings are not allowed.
1999: France introduces a civil contract that gives some rights to cohabiting couples, regardless of sex. These do not include the full rights of marriage, notably over taxes, inheritance and adoption.
2003: Belgium legalizes gay marriages.
June 2005: Spain allows gay couples to marry and adopt children.
Read more2004: Massachusetts becomes the first state to issue marriage licenses for gay couples. In Oregon, officials in the Portland area begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples before an amendment to the state constitution banning such weddings is approved by voters.
April 2005: Connecticut becomes the second U.S. state to allow same-sex civil unions and the first to do so without orders from a court. But it specifically defines marriage as being the union of a man and a woman.
June 2005: Canada legalizes same-sex marriages.
2004: New Zealand‘s parliament approves civil unions between gay couples.
read moreThat means big business for wedding planners. Richard Jones is one of the planners who is cashing in on the new British law that will take effect in two weeks. His company, “Modern Commitments,” already has signed up more than 100 clients.
Yes it all is very disgusting.it’s not actually marriage you know just a civil union. and i agreee its disgusting
Pope Benedict XVI warned against false imitations of marriage at the Latin American Episcopal Commissions for the Family and Life. And he also when decrying the use of embryonic subjects, he also decried the wide acceptance of homosexual unions.Yes it all is very disgusting.
And yes these ‘unions’ are called marriages sometimes but they aren’t marriages in the way Catholics believe. The term ‘marriage’ does get thrown around and many get confused.
Right now G&L rights groups spokepersons(here in the US) are claiming that no one church will be forced to perform those ceremonies if they don’t want to- should gay marriage become legal here- but I believe that once they’ve been legal for awhile churches will be forced to do it-or lose their tax exempt status.You bet that will happen.I am just wondering how long it will take for these countries to try to force the Church to perform ceremonies those so-called marrages.
PF
:nope: How awful. That can’t really happen, can it? It seems like it would go against religious rights and beliefs, etc…can they really force you to do that in the US?Right now G&L rights groups spokepersons(here in the US) are claiming that no one church will be forced to perform those ceremonies if they don’t want to- should gay marriage become legal here- but I believe that once they’ve been legal for awhile churches will be forced to do it-or lose their tax exempt status.You bet that will happen.
But what makes you think that gay and lesbian couples would even want to be married in a church that hates them?Right now G&L rights groups spokepersons(here in the US) are claiming that no one church will be forced to perform those ceremonies if they don’t want to- should gay marriage become legal here- but I believe that once they’ve been legal for awhile churches will be forced to do it-or lose their tax exempt status.You bet that will happen.
No it isn’t, it is one of the purposes. Is it an invalid marriage if one cannot create?Better not they are pseudo marriages. The purpose of marriage is to pro-create. Homosexual unions can’t do this.
People here should really calm doen, I mean there have been some completely over the top reactions.
“The most disgusting thing I’ve ever read”
Well either you dont read much, or that is hyperbole.
Some agression about the topic is beyond being Catholic, if you disagree with homosexual UNIONS because you are catholic, then you are dissapointed, not angry and disgusted.
These are unions, and thus we should not complain, we should be annoyed if they are marriages, however they are not, something that many homosexual couples that I have seen interviewed are quick to highlight.
It does penance for the sins of others, but it is not broadminded about sin.Christian love bears evil, but it does not tolerate it.
How can you not see that they are not analogous?No it isn’t, it is one of the purposes. Is it an invalid marriage if one cannot create?
Yes indeed, no marriage to a post menopausal marriage is valid. Surely you know that?No it isn’t, it is one of the purposes. Is it an invalid marriage if one cannot create?
Wow. What a shame.of course they can! this isn’t exactly the same, but back in the 1800’s and earlier, it was ilegal for people of different races to marry. it became legal, but there are some churches that teach that it’s wrong for people to marry outside of their race. they can get in big trouble if someone complains about it. It’s happend at some churches in the south, I know. I don’t want this to turn into a racial disguession, but I’m just pointing that out. Gay marrage is disgusting and can’t even be put in the same boat as people marrying outside of their race. but, if a church says they won’t marry people of different races, isn’t that their religious right? the government took that away after time. You better believe that they will force this on churches. remember, the devil is behind this rediculus law and he wants to bring down churches, esp the Catholic church!
The Church does not hate them. The Church hopes they will repent of their sin and return to God.But what makes you think that gay and lesbian couples would even want to be married in a church that hates them?