1
1959
Guest
What are your thoughts? I personally think that it shows how far down our liberal society has fallen. 20 or 30 years ago it would have been unthinkable, but, now anything goes. What’s next?
That and criminalizing signals of disapproval. Punishing those who openly disbelieve that the best and required treatment of gender dysphoria is accomodation of a false persona as the absolute truth about the patient. I expect that raising questions about that will come to be considered a violation of civil rights.Polygamy is next. Honestly, I am surprised that it has not already been codified in law.
Seeing that now…it will likely get worse…That and criminalizing signals of disapproval.
It’s called consent by a legal adult.I’d also like to add that the whole “you can’t help how you feel, so therefore your feelings are good” idea can cause lots of problems. I’m not comparing people with homosexual tendencies to pedophiles or anything like that, but the only way that idea can be acceptable in society is by using double standards. What about people with pedophilic tendencies, or people with psychopathic tendencies?
Morality and legality should not be mixed. Legality should be based on harm of innocent or unwilling participants.You missed the point entirely. The point was, just because someone can’t help their feelings doesn’t automatically make those feelings good. That’s a bad criterion for deeming something morally acceptable. I know the difference between homosexuality and pedophilia. That’s why I didn’t compare them.
Legality is based on potential harm to others, such as driving impaired, etc.Consenting adults can abuse alcohol and prescription medication. Consent doesn’t nullify harm.