Your reasoning at this point is very weak.I said you sound like the Westboro church because you call people enablers, which is the same word they use. And you are not much better than they are. At least they’re honest about their hatred toward homosexuality.
You decided to answer my question with one of your own.Do you celebrate at our service men and womens
military funerals? Do you blame there
sacrifices and deaths on the gay community?
Again I don’t advocate the life style, but I don’t
hate them . There still gods children , so stop
with the nonsense .
I absolutely agree with this. I have seen this when I was a kid myself, how school kids used to bully boys who were weak or effeminate. It may just happen that the weak or effeminate boy turned out to be homosexual, but he was not bullied for being a homosexual. Not that I am justifying bulling in any way, but I see it as something that should be addressed at its root cause.However, hard data did not support this claim, and in fact, legitimate studies show that the #1 cause of bullying in schools is body size/shape
What is really surprising is that you completely ignored the point in the OP’s post and went on a tangent. That’s really surprising.It doesn’t surprise me at all that a teen is less likely to get bullied for being gay in Canada than in the United States.
Your reasoning at this point is very weak.
So anyone who uses the word “enabler” is from the WBC? There are others (like myself) who use that word and yet reject the WBC.
I never said you are from the WBC, I said your wording was the same as theirs so it worried me. I’m sorry, but I see a bit of hatred inside of people who have some ridiculous idea that homosexuality is for some reason a special kind of “super sin.”Hatred? You want to know what is hatred? It’s not caring for where their souls ultimately end up in! That is something that homosexualists and their enabler allies tend to do!
AIDS was not “invented” by homosexuals. It’s a virus and has probably been around a long time, though likely in a form not so virulent and deadly. This is a virus that mutates quickly - one of the reasons a vaccine has not been created yet. HIV / AIDS was probably active in its present form since at least mid 20th century, just not identified. There were unidentified illnesses in those days that were referred to as “wasting” diseases - very possibly HIV. Nor was the disease portion of it (AIDS) prevalent because sexual mores were different during those times and that seems to be the speediest way for this virus to travel. But to say homosexuals invented it is, for lack of a better word, preposterous.because of contraception. Aids was invented by active homosexual male couples in america. Those were the earliest cases known to science, before aids was even “aids”. It’s everybody’s problem now, I agree. But trying to pass the blame away from homosexuality when it is 100% responsible for the creation of this monstrosity, is wrong.
Then I’m telling you this.I never said you are from the WBC, I said your wording was the same as theirs so it worried me. I’m sorry, but I see a bit of hatred inside of people who have some ridiculous idea that homosexuality is for some reason a special kind of “super sin.”
I know you aren’t, I believe that you’re Catholic. You may not hate homosexuals, but the attitude you seem to have regarding this issue does not show any love toward them.Then I’m telling you this.
Do not worry, I am not from the WBC. I know that you’re insinuating that I think or am from the WBC.
To claim that I hate them is really faulty reasoning.
I’m not even angry. I just answer these questions of yours in a very direct and decisive manner.Your seem to be angry, is that what religion
does for you? I value human life , all walks
of it , and as far as the post is concerned on
gay teens die , who’s to blame. It should not
even merit attention.
If by love you mean enabling, then I do not have enabling.I know you aren’t, I believe that you’re Catholic. You may not hate homosexuals, but the attitude you seem to have regarding this issue does not show any love toward them.
Your attitude towards homosexuals, as though they are all Hell bound makes you come across as being hateful towards them. You seem to be forgetting that homosexuality is a sin, and all sin can be forgiven.If by love you mean enabling, then I do not have enabling.
I do love them, enough to care where their souls ultimately end up in. Hence, me condemning homosexism and enabling.
You’re insinuating something which is dead false.Your attitude towards homosexuals, as though they are all Hell bound makes you come across as being hateful towards them. You seem to be forgetting that homosexuality is a sin, and all sin can be forgiven.
BINGO. This is what tolerance ignores. All of you who would rather wash your hands of this issue and pretend that it is a legitimate option to let people do what they want without you interfering, keep this in mind, that if you loved a man even in the slightest you would want for him to obtain salvation.If by love you mean enabling, then I do not have enabling.
I do love them, enough to care where their souls ultimately end up in. Hence, me condemning homosexism and enabling.
I agree with you here. They should not be driven away. However, that is not an excuse for enabling behavior because then, we are not doing it out of love. You could end up with a dilemma there with your suggestion, friend.Brother, if you are truly concerned with there souls , you
don’t drive them away from our religion and faith
I don’t know you , but you come across as
harsh, and by doing so even if you mean well
your not helping your cause