D
DanielJT
Guest
It’s a problem that occurs because of the legal precedent set by redefining what marriage is. When it becomes merely a “civil contract” than any consenting parties willing to enter into it may do so.I was in a good debate on homosexuality the past week on facebook in which I asked a question. If homosexuals were allowed to marry than would it not also be discrimination if we do not allow three people to marry or four? Couldnt they file discrimination as well? What would stop them?
One gay friend said that three and four are not marriage by definition and therefore would not be discrimmination
Another poster said something I wasn’t sure how to respond to. Here is is response…
How would you have responded? If no one is required to solve anything than to me that is an answer to my point. If no one solves anything than the snow ball will keep rolling with no one to stop it.
thoughts??
These ramifications will come about because of the basic legal argument presented by same-sex marriage defenders. If you are pushing for this legal basis, you are by default pushing for all of its legal fallout.